Upcoming changes to the point system

97 515

Note: These changes are live now.

TLDR:

  • The point system is renamed to the random rewarder;

  • Points for articles and short posts are given only in featured communities;

  • Each submission gets at most 50% chance to get points and only in one community;

  • Chance is to get 20 points for article or 5 points for short posts, still has to pass the exclusivity check;

  • About 30% of daily points go towards random upvotes by power users, each upvote might give anywhere from zero to a few hundred points, but no more than 2% of daily points;

  • A single featured community cannot give more than 5% of total daily points;

  • No points for comments anywhere;

  • No points for any other action too (100/1000 views, 10/100 thumbs up, signing up, logging in, etc...);

  • When you delete an article or short post that got you points we still deduct the exact amount we gave you;

  • Personalized point rate stays;

  • Moderators in featured communities still get 20%, affiliates still get 10%;

  • You are better off not thinking about how the random rewarder works at all :) after all it's quite random;

  • Next big upcoming change - you will only be able to submit article to one community (and re-submit to different one if it wasn't accepted) or not submit at all.


Longer version

A lot of people now think about the point system as of their job, so much so that we constantly get angry letters that somebody's point rate is low, like we had a contract with them or something.

I guess when you have a "system" people kind of expect to get "paid" (and on time!)

What's even worse, they think that we're buying characters, so they are producing them at break-neck speed. Some of them producing 1000 points per day of ultra-low quality content. That's like 50 articles per day! Assuming he/she sleeps 8 hours and types all other time - that's an article every 19 minutes round the clock without even a bathroom visit. Yet they still bug us that their point rate is too low ("I'm not spamming or anything!")

In reality the fund, despite being $13,000 is far too small to give "work" for 6,500 users (yikes!), even if we gave away everything right now.

It would be only $2 per user.

One-time payment of $2... and that's it, the fund is gone!

Having established that the fund is totally not suited to "hire" people, we understood that we need a new role for the fund.

We are much better off using the fund as a random reward mechanism, so that some people are rewarded sometimes for some of the good things they do.

That's why we're renaming the points system to the random rewarder. Don't let the name confuse you - it doesn't give points to the random people for random letters, it's still pretty strict.

We can't reward everybody all the time, we can't even reward some people all the time. The only thing left is to reward some people sometimes. That's the best we can do for now. Otherwise it's always a race to the bottom. Who can produce more of articles exactly 500-letters in length.

That's not what the fund was supposed to stimulate at all.

Ok, enough of chit-chat, let's get to the details and why's.

Details

As previously noted 70% of the daily fund spending will go towards actions approved by moderators in featured communities.

However, there are two situations we want to avoid: having too active/powerful communities and moderator corruption.

Too active/powerful communities

Today we have approved one of the first non-English communities to be featured πŸŽ‰ - that is "Bengali Recipe (ea62)" - at least we didn't find any big problems with it (it's a single topic, single language, no plagiarism - our OC checker seems to be giving us a green light on "no plagiarism" in the community and it's pretty hard with recipes, most of them usually are copy-pasted from the Internet), but the problem is that this community produces two times more content in a day than every other featured community combined.

Do we really want to give away 66% of all daily fund spending to motivate a single community, leaving just 33% for all of other communities?

No, no and no.

That's why we're putting a limit of 5% of daily points on a community. For now. We might decrease it later.

No community will be able to give away more than 5% of all daily points combined given out by the random rewarder.

For example, if the random rewarder gave 10,000 points in a day, that means that one community will only be able to give away 500 points that day.

...but that leads us to another problem:

Moderator corruption

In theory moderation teams don't care about who they approve as long as content isn't going to lose them their featured status.

However, when you have a limited amount of points to give away (5% of daily spending) you might be tempted to approve your friends first (or people who give you a kickback) while the points last, and everyone else - later, not giving them any points.

To avoid this we're lowering the chance to get 20 points for the approved article or 5 points for the approved short post to 50%. In that case the moderator doesn't know whether his friend will or will not get any points, so there is a significantly higher chance that moderators won't be corrupted.

There is an indicator that shows that the community is no longer giving points for now (until enough time passes so that total is less than 5%):

The chance to get points for your article/post in this community now is 24%

No points for 100/1000 views, 10/100 thumbs up, signing up, logging in

All these have been subject to huge abuse (upvoting rings, buying traffic, registering hundreds of accounts), so we're putting a stop to this too.

No points for comments

Comments currently are responsible for nearly 50% of points given out daily. Yet 99% of them are useless. We will stop motivating people to create this kind of useless content, so that the only motivation there will be left would be to communicate with author. However, you can still get points for comments via "Random upvotes by power users"

Random upvotes by power users

How do we motivate people that don't yet have any good content to post to featured communities?

We're trying an experiment that we wrote about a bit earlier - we're dedicating up to 30% of daily points given by the random rewarder towards upvotes by power users, so that somebody upvoting (thumbs up) your article/post or even comment outside of featured communities might get you anywhere from zero to a few hundred points (but no more than 2% of daily points).

Yes, that means that your older content might get you points too. It also means that you should be upvoting good content and downvoting bad content, who know - maybe you will give somebody nice a few hundred points doing that.

Live now

We expect the number of daily points generated to drop from 50000 points to probably a few thousand points.

We still hope that this will motivate people to write and communicate, which is what the fund is there to do, but it won't seem like we're giving you a job, because frankly at $70 per day for 6,500 people it's simply impossible.

However, by producing interesting articles, by communicating, you are creating a better version of read.cash that will get more money to the fund and will be paying more to the people.

Next big upcoming change - you will only be able to submit article to one community...

...and re-submit to different one if it wasn't accepted) or not submit at all.

The reason for this is this:

25 communities! 25 discussions, 25 versions of one article. But it also makes communities useless. Can you even guess what this article is about, judging from the communities it has been submitted to? Team Readcash? Be yourself? Earn money for free? Share your apps? In reality, the post is about cartoon characters... It's a nice post, but this kind of thing makes community participation worthless and very confusing.

We will limit it now so that you either submit your article to a community or not. That way we'll have only one discussion and person will have to really choose a good community. Just like it works now with short posts - one community - one submission. That will make everyone's life easier - one discussion page and no more confusion with which version of the article you're looking at.

We will give you the optional ability to choose one community to select for your older articles (rest will redirect to the new one).

Why did we even make it? Well, when we launched communities back about 6 months ago, we barely had any idea how they should work. It seemed like a good idea to be able to put your article to multiple communities. However, now we understand that it diminishes the value of each community. The author doesn't even think about where this article should belong.

What to do if you want people in other communities to know about your article? Write a relevant short post with a link to your article. BTW after we're finally done with the random rewarder - we might finally get to improving the short posts (to add images and better way to add links) and comments editor.

This cat-and-mouse game with people thinking read.cash hired them to type is really tiring. We want to return to doing something else to improve the site, not teaching our exclusive content detector how to convert Greek letters to English or whatever this crap is. Note though how many communities accepted this kind of crap. That's a big reason why we need to limit the submissions to one.

If you need money - there are plenty of better ways to earn money (for ex. learn programming - there are tons of free courses on YouTube; within a few years you'll be earning really well).

Please stay on read.cash only if you like to write.

34
$ 0.01
$ 0.01 from @tsakf
Sponsors of Read.Cash
empty
empty

Comments

Thank you for the info read.cash, I will try to stay on read.cash even if my tips stop, I like to write about crypto and my life in the hope that my writing hobby can ease the burden on my mind because it has come out in written form, but my message is read .cash is not a stepchild of new users, if they are wrong it's normal, because they are just learning, thank you.

$ 0.00
2 years ago

The amount should depend on quality of the post....if there are good posts in the community... the matter will be solved and make report system so that anybody can't post or comment appropiate things..... but looking at the system.........the money is too low... if the posts are filtered out.... there will be less post good posts will get the desired amount.... but it will be unfair if a good post doesn't get the appropiate value... and how do you judge a post? by like and comments and if there is no pointa for like and comment... people won't do it.... then good posts will get less like comment and will be underrated..... problem was with the moderators they approved inappropiate things..... and start report and ban system... the inappropiate post and comments will be gone.... but in this system....some dedicated people will lose their interest if they don't get proper value....

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Why you guys making tough ,, it's getting harder,, please leave the comments ,, it's make our points

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I don't just understand the rules .. It is not your fault though .. It is the situation the people kept in that is what is bringing in so much rules . All the same kudos for your great work

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I m new here please tell me how can we work here or

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thanks admin for this new changes.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I think these are good steps, specially comments, moderator's corruption. It's a big move towards building spam free community !!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thank you read.cash. this really help me understand how pointing system works. Btw I'm here. This update will help giving points to spam comments

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Nice! Although i didnt know whats the meaning of upvotes?hehe but i like the random rewards. Ill try to make one article later. I just need to read more articles to learn more about this article.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I don't if it's just me but the words seem like there's a bit of sassy in there. it's so entertaining to read. But anyways, thank God I found this article. I have been wondering why my points were not that high. i thought I did something illegal. But it's cool tho. Thank you for making us aware of the changes!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thanks a lot for the changes..

$ 0.00
3 years ago

So does it mean the more you write articles the more your points increase?

$ 0.00
3 years ago

The amount should depend on quality of the post....if there are good posts in the community... the matter will be solved and make report system so that anybody can't post or comment appropiate things..... but looking at the system.........the money is too low... if the posts are filtered out.... there will be less post good posts will get the desired amount.... but it will be unfair if a good post doesn't get the appropiate value... and how do you judge a post? by like and comments and if there is no pointa for like and comment... people won't do it.... then good posts will get less like comment and will be underrated..... problem was with the moderators they approved inappropiate things..... and start report and ban system... the inappropiate post and comments will be gone.... but in this system....some dedicated people will lose their interest if they don't get proper value....

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I absolutely agree with posting an article in one community. I cannot sense posting a single topic but posting it to different communities with different rules, language, specific features. Like you are publishing your lovelife to a community that caters only to the beauty of nature. Nonsense.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I manage my communities multiple times each day (not always easy to tell if OC or not, despite best attempts) but not make it into featured communities. Maybe make them random too! ;)

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I like the idea that you rather not read all the rules. The rules have to be complex so that gaming it should be taxing! I LOVE what you guys are doing. People like me will just go about their business and not worry about whats changing with the rules!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thank you for the update readcash. I agree on removing the points in thumbs up. Because some readers, read your article and they say a "flattered word" but not thumbs up your work, so i am okay with that changes

And hoping for your notice in my article :)

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I admit that I'm just one of some people posting in different communities. I'm so sorry about that. I'll take this as a lesson and will surely follow the rules.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

It was a nice article

$ 0.00
3 years ago

If people have an article in more than one community, you indicate that they may choose where to keep it. How, as it is now, should they even now in which communities it is? They cannot see where it has been submitted by someone else.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

We will give you some way to say "Ok, this article should stay in this community only, other versions should just redirect to that submission". No need to submit again, it will be a separate screen to select among communities that you have submitted your article to.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Ok, I see.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thank you for this update and information. And now I realized that it is useless to submit many communities that not related to our articles . I'm excited about your next big changes in this site in order for the user not to abuse or cheat on this site. When I'm writing in this site I always keep in mind that I should abide by the rules of your site and always keep in writing. Thank you @readcah, keep updating us always.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I'm sure @readcah whoever he is, is happy to hear that.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thank you I hope that you will notice my articles and give advise if I improve my writing skills .

$ 0.00
3 years ago

πŸ˜… @read.cash

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Oh my God 🀣🀣🀣

$ 0.00
3 years ago

All this writer needs to understand that read.cash can't pay them entirely. They need to have a business model that can go along with their writing. I write so that I can promote the hobby so that in future there will be new collectors will be interested in it by buying it. I write so that I can build my reputation to make it easier for me to make a sale. You need to ask yourself what you want in the long run.

$ 0.01
3 years ago

That's like 50 articles per day! Assuming he/she sleeps 8 hours and types all other time - that's an article every 19 minutes round the clock without even a bathroom visit. Yet they still bug us that their point rate is too low ("I'm not spamming or anything!")

This one annoyed me too. Sound impossible to do especially if you have another job to do.

Today we have approved one of the first non-English communities to be featured...

There are still chances for other communities to be approved?

our OC checker If the articles are written with weird fonts, I will retype it again and search it on googles. I found plagiarism twice even after the OC tools approved it.

We will stop motivating people to create this kind of useless content so that the only motivation there will be left would be to communicate with the author.

Looking forward to this.

downvoting bad content,

What are the bad contents in your opinions?

However, by producing interesting articles, by communicating, you are creating a better version of read.cash that will get more money to the fund and will be paying more to the people.

This is the future that I want to be in with.

That will make everyone's life easier - one discussion page and no more confusion with which version of the article you're looking at.

@Wakeupkitty will be happy with this update.

We will give you the optional ability to choose one community to select for your older articles

Should we need to submit again? Or we just let it to be done automatically? And what do you mean by new one?

Please stay on read. cash only if you like to write.

I want to stay and I hope my way of writing can help to improve your site.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

There are still chances for other communities to be approved?

Absolutely! We expect the number of featured communities to grow. There are too few right now.

What are the bad contents in your opinions?

https://i.imgur.com/OnoqzSA.png for example

But frankly, anything that isn't genuine. Anything that's obviously copied from somewhere.

Should we need to submit again? Or we just let it to be done automatically? And what do you mean by new one?

We will give you some way to say "Ok, this article should stay in this community only, other versions should just redirect to that submission". No need to submit again, it will be a separate screen.

I want to stay and I hope my way of writing can help to improve your site.

πŸ‘

$ 0.01
3 years ago

Thank you. The example you just gave, that is more than bad. Mkmk? I lost my replies πŸ˜…

$ 0.00
3 years ago

That's a nice idea set up. The system must be properly programmed and organised. Kudos to the read.cash tr for thinking of such. Long live read.cash!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I wil stay, read.cash. I love writing, I don't care how much money I will earn here.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Nice big change Readcash, I totally agree with these changes. I'm sure real and honest writers will understand. I'm not saying I'm a good one.. But it would be fair enough for those who are being honest with their activities with the site. Keep it up! Thanks for sharing!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

so basically, if you're not lucky then you will not get points even when you post quality articles to featured community? And it's sad that you can no longer get points in comments anywhere. But it's true that you can't pay everyone especially when they're posting articles that are not quality. Now, it gets very serious. You need to be a writer to earn. You need to have good writing skills and be more creative to earn. Push ourselves so we can still be worthy of the points and what they're paying us for, if we're lucky.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Among other things, there is only one that brother's me in this new changes. The fact that no more points for comments, wouldn't that makes the system uninteresting? Because i found it very appealing replying to comments on my articles, and now that there will be no points from it I think it will be so uninteresting. You talk about communicating with author, will this also be without points?

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Well, if you want to communicate with the author - you don't need points for that. At least now you'll know that people really wanted to tell you something instead of just doing it to get points (which is pretty low anyway - you'll spend time replying to them, but they weren't even interested).

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I agree with the update, that many things have been removed from the platform, since one sends articles, to a certain community, and now it is difficult to give a vote in favor of the person, with this changes the thing .

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Change is inevitable. But I like change and I am used in adjusting with these changes. I just hope that good writers will not lose heart with this changes. I believe that if we really love writing articles, then we should stay. I will observe for 48 hours on how the new point system works. I must admit that reading an article and commenting on it too is a fast way to earn points and since commenting on articles does not reward you anymore, I hope that people will still read articles and not just write and write and write. Removing the points for thumbs up, I guess the like button is not being noticed most of the time. I observed that there are people commenting on the article saying they liked it but did not hit the like button. So I guess it's okay to remove it.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

on how the new point system random rewarder works ;) FTFY

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I learned two new internet acronym today thanks to you. TLDR and FTFY. I might use it when I comment to other articles I read.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

The one I like the most is "IANAL" :) Despite the looks, it's a really useful acronym.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Read.cash is now improving day by day. But the updates are coming very rapidly. That's why users are sometime confused .

$ 0.00
3 years ago

OMG, 50% of the point are giving to comment. I don't know how they had the time to bloody do it. In fact got one time, someone comment 200+ time at one of my article with nonsense. While i may be glad about the point, but it really hurt my pride as a writer. I prefer someone commenting about how well I write than filling it with garbage. I ban that idiot from my page.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I think it makes more sense if the article could be submitted to two communities (or three).
If I write about orange trees and their origin, and there's only a 'history' community and a 'fruits' community, it's good that I can submit to both.

Yes, submitting to 35 communities does not make sense, only one I'm also not sure is the right approach.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

It's not only about the number. Having an article in two communities is very confusing to majority of the people who really try to interact with it - two sets of comments, repeats of the article in the feed (we de-duplicate the feed, but it leads to other situations where you see one version of the article, but not the second one, yet you're sure that second one was there).

$ 0.00
3 years ago

It's not only about the number. Having an article in two communities is very confusing to majority

Ok

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I just wrote an article in native language that how Read.cash works in order to bring 1000 new users from my country . Now I need to change it again :) . this seems pretty nice . There should be points for non communities articles and there should be place for it on read.cash main page. just a suggestion

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Sorry, we're just a startup in search of how it should work. :) Frankly I would prefer to have much more stable rules too. The point for non-communities articles are there in form of upvotes from power users. Yes, they have a smaller chance, but even featured communities have only 50% chance or less to get points.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

No need to apologetic I am here from 5 months and I am a daily user just missed last 3 weeks because of Covid . This platforms already made a difference to thousand of life . I helped 1000 of people because of this platform . ITs great to see its evolving and evolution don't come easy way . best of luck with that and with this conversation I got the idea of my other article :)

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This update of yours is really good, violators and abusers will be no longer tolerated. But there's also a negative side, one of them are the possibility that the number of users might decrease. Let's be honest, some of the users came here and put some effort and time in publishing their quality content articles just to earn. Well, that's the main goal of some users. Anw, good update tho @Read.Cash

$ 0.00
3 years ago

You are right to adjust some issues because there are people manipulating the ongoing system

$ 0.00
3 years ago

These are awesome changes and are highly welcomed by me. I support it as it will make read.cash more competitive among other blogging sites.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Hayts!sa comment na lang nga ako bumabawi dahil wala na akoung maisip na article. Ok by the way GOODBYE READCASH We miss you.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Bye-bye!

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Bye! Se you soon my favorite websiteπŸ˜˜πŸ˜–

$ 0.00
3 years ago

More strict rules. I was inspired to write at firs, but still encouraging myself to write more.. By the way, what about points for referrals? It's just so sad, that because of a single mistake, everyone will be affected πŸ˜₯ but still putting hope in here. Keep writing aspiring writers πŸ˜‰

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Referrals=affiliates - still 10%.

a single mistake

I wish I could show you the internal stats. It's probably about maybe 50% of points that go to cheaters, probably 40% goes to useless comments ("Thank you information, very good, rid.cosh") and useless articles.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I agree with that, just so sad for others who are honest (include myself) and really serious in making articles. Though I admit some articles here are useless. Maybe some just do this writing for the sake of earning more points.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

What if πŸ€” ahm, I just want to suggest to make this fair and square. Because not all are members of featured communities. To give chance to everyone to be able to read their articles, Why not erase all those current communities, then create at least 5 communities with categories, like, 1. Health and Sciences, 2. Creative Writings, 3. Politics and Current Events, 4. People and the World, 5. Travel and Leisure... something like that πŸ˜… just few features communities so readers will be able to visit all those communities and read whichever article they wanted to read. Just saying, ignore if this is non sense πŸ˜…πŸ˜…

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thank you so much for this info in the next update. I am excited and the same time worried about the upcoming changes in this site in order for the user not to abuse, spam or cheat on this site. I always keep in mind that I should abide by the rules of your site and always keep in writing. Thanks @readcash and love youu

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Those are some big changes right there. I hope if filters most of the unwanted and useless content.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

All this writer needs to understand that read.cash can't pay them entirely. They need to have a business model that can go along with their writing. I write so that I can promote the hobby so that in future there will be new collectors will be interested in it by buying it. I write so that I can build my reputation to make it easier for me to make a sale. You need to ask yourself what you want in the long run.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Wow. I thought read.cash was an answer to my prayers. I've never complained about not enough points. Even though my articles have done extremely well here, I've only made a few dollars from the fund in over a week. Now I'll get less? So far I've given more via boost than I have received. By A LOT. Wow.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Note that even though there will be less points given, the daily amount given is the same, so each point will get much ore points. But again, the important thing here is with $70/day at hand we can't pay all 6500 users fairly. That's the problem, not how we distribute it.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I have terrible 'luck' when it comes to random things. I'm screwed

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I was in the middle of working on very good article too. Had to do A LOT of research for it all week long too. My luck is bad with random things. So now I'll be working really hard and even if my articles do well because they're high quality- I MIGHT get something for it?

$ 0.00
3 years ago

That is exactly the problem why we're doing this. I don't mean it as an offense to you, but lot of people thought we're hiring every user without any screening. If you are good with words - there are tons of publications that will pay you top dollars for that. Like, really, look for jobs sections at any top blog - send them your samples - you'll get work paying maybe $50 to $1000 per article, because they are established businesses with good budgets. read.cash can't afford that. People are publishing 1000+ articles per day and we have a budget of $70/day (even less if sponsors leave), so each article at best can get $0.07 and there's a neverending race to the bottom - people are publishing more and more and more, so the pay will be less and less and less anyway.

Don't write on read.cash because you might get paid - write because you like writing. Any rewards given at random are just that - random rewards.

If you want a job - I seriously advice you to look through the jobs sections at top blogs.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

The new point system is too strict to be honest. I joined just 3 days ago and I didn't meet a good paying system but I still maintained my composure and continued writing. Now it not better, but my love for writing and read.cash, I can't just give up suddenly

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Totally agree with the new rule but at the same time sad because of some people over used it πŸ˜”.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I have been one of your biggest supporters and i STILL think this platform is promising...But this is the worst update you have ever done. I've earned from this platform varied amounts from 2 dollars a day to just few cents. Ive never complained about that and actually i even told people to be patient because it's still just the beginning and, like you said, this can't be considered as real job for now. But why you went from fighting spamming and rule abusers to fighting every user including content makers? spending hours in searching and typing to just get rewarded based on pure luck isn't fair at all! and why not just reduce the points you get from comments instead of getting no points? I know the fund is vey small...So why dont you start an advertising plan to earn more money? this will be a good idea! In the end i just hope that the update won't be the reason why read.cash dies...

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Jeez, people are actually repeating others' words here letter by letter. I guess no more comment spam.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This looks like the right way forward. I had stopped reading the front page due to the number of low quality articles put out, if the quality improves again as a reaction to this then I'm going to be reading a lot more again.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Nice! This update is better, at least everyone should really exert effort to write "QUALITY" content. There are lots of people here who spams or publishes trash and irrelevant articles just for the sake of points or worst, they steal other people's work!

$ 0.00
User's avatar Ace
3 years ago

Good update, I was getting tired of all the spam. Hopefully the majority of the spammers will leave the site now and real content writers will be left. To all those that think this is a bad update, personally, I never cared about the point system since it gave a very low amount anyways. Tips is where the better income is at and now with the point system handicapped, you should just work on writing better articles that get tipped.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

All this writer needs to understand that read.cash can't pay them entirely. Hopefully the majority of the spammers will leave the site now and real content writers will be left. To all those that think this is a bad update, personally, I never cared about the point system since it gave a very low amount anyways. Thank you so much for this writing

$ 0.00
3 years ago

So sad for this new rules. It's random . And how about the effort of some good writer if they are not choose from random rewards? What will happen? I'm still hoping for another updates that cannot affect to all good writer..., Because earlier I saw some articles that contains only jumbled letter and guess it's acceptable and earn point oh wow..

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Yes, as you suggest I won't think about this I won't think about the point at all, just will continue writing articles

$ 0.00
3 years ago

If the publications will now be sent to featured communities for points, at what point will communities that failed to get featured be eligible for featured status if the posts are no longer for this community?

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I gave up posting because of the last set of changes. Now I have no reason to even log in and look for stuff to read. This place went downhill fast. Just became another steemit with power users having all the say. All you need to do now is give them the power to censor too and the journey to the dark side will be complete.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Hopefully this change will clean up the low quality articles and allow room for the better submissions to get some deserved recognition

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This is great. I think a lot of people will have to work away now, the really writers will be the only one left. Thanks readcash you did great.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This is cool. Let’s see how it goes.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Salamat read cash

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Content is king and up until now the generosity of read.cash has attracted low quality content providers and spammer.

If allowed to continue this parasitical affliction will lead to the death of a useful and valuable resource.

We may now all have to work a little bit harder to ensure that we are offering quality content but this is normal and the way things should be.

Thank you read.cash for continuing to safeguard this community.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Hello, very thanks for the information, it sgood know all the new changes, i suggest that some of this content is published on spanish. beacuse the comunity have a highest community on spanish. greatings.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Many people don't know about how we have to work and what kind of articles write here to get top points

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This new changes are well organized thanks admin

$ 0.00
3 years ago

This point system is very goo. I expect this system very well. I always stay with you and carry on.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I'll look forward to this changes and does the platform go well. Thank you for the update.

I'll keep this in mind.

$ 0.00
3 years ago