Archive of IFP to IFP with Grasberg and assert somewhere in middle.

Though I'm new to this whole bch and crypto stuffs am saying RIP to ABC I'll go through your highlighted posts to understand it very well

The Coinbase Rule improvement is as follows: All newly mined blocks must contain an output assigning 8% of the newly mined coins to a specified address.

Is this an Amaury's joke?

I will try to read the dramas that you present one by one, hopefully enough time to start, it looks like this drama is interesting to understand.

Succes for you ralak and BCH.

You may have missed this IFP article. It was a little before ABC released their IFP, so it doesn't follow the naming but it is very much on-topic. https://read.cash/@TomZ/mythbusting-we-need-a-developer-fund-3e0d7f20

Need bch i need money for my family

Upvote me please

Hahahaha RIP ABC token 😂😂 that was too fast for you.

https://read.cash/@shin19/stop-spreading-corona-virus-4b40268a

Good bye to all those mentioned in this post, may your souls rest in peace

Thank you for this sir ralak. Now I can see it clear why and whats happening.

Goodbye...haha

Hahahaha,, Rip ABC!!!

good collection of links! thank you

Thanks for sharing!

You split we bankrupt you

Anyone here with IQ 80+? Come join real BitCoin and quit fuckin around with this shitshow 👌👋

What could go wrong with the upgrade and decentralization ?i honestly hope that it will end peacefully..to the makers and leaders make up your mind and think as a whole..

very nice

Thanks for the info

"The Coinbase Rule improvement is as follows: All newly mined blocks must contain an output assigning 8% of the newly mined coins to a specified address."

-- Does this mean that miners can decide the address by themselves?

I still prefer ABC regarding the way you freely attack them.

Disagreement should never end to opinion war.

Both of you have to learn from each other, and I am quite surprising the way the debate evolve.

Fighting each other while you are on the same crypto-side is counter productive.

Time will say what side was the better, but I am quite convinced that your positions have more in common than you try to prove.

Thankyou for sharing 🤗

Nice collection

Good work.thank you

Thank you ABC for your contributions

I humbly request to add mine as well:

https://read.cash/@mtrycz/why-is-grasberg-so-controversial-c265a613

RIP bcash. Thank you ABC for uncucking big block bitcoin in 2017. You served your purpose and now BSV lives on as the big block bitcoin.

This is a great collection, thanks. Please add this link https://read.cash/@Bitcoin.com/to-our-customers-regarding-the-bitcoin-cash-network-upgrade-in-november-47879f0f

Informative article

That great

Very great! Such a good article. Keep on posting and inspired everyone from your article have a good day to you 😊

Wow nice article

Nice one

Collections of links like this are super useful. Thanks for compiling! (EDIT: Oh also, feel free to include a link to my DAA video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wFuCqkmbrw)

EDIT EDIT: Also also, Toomim's proposal?

https://read.cash/@jtoomim/bch-upgrade-proposal-use-asert-as-the-new-daa-8887b9c1

You forgot the original announcement of the IFP by Jiang Zhuoer on January 22. Link to the archive (which includes the "non-debate theory"): https://web.archive.org/web/20200123082358/https://medium.com/@jiangzhuoer/infrastructure-funding-plan-for-bitcoin-cash-131fdcd2412e

Coinspice also made an IFP timeline: https://coinspice.io/ifp/with-ifp-defeated-bitcoin-abc-viabtc-coinex-ceo-publicly-consider-a-bitcoin-cash-foundation/ (see the bottom of the article).