Archaeopteryx, Birds & Dinosaurs *In two articles, I will discuss the relationship between birds and dinosaurs. This is the first one; the second one is* A comparison of Birds and Their Ancestral Dinosaurs*.* https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/a-comparison-of-birds-and-their-ancestral-dinosaurs-232683b6 Birds are Dinosaurs In 1880, Thomas Henry Huxley suggested that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Huxley based his theory on a comparison of Archaeopteryx, generally considered to be an early bird, and bones from Theropod dinosaurs that were found in the same area. He found striking similarities.
This idea, already then seen with skepticism by his colleagues, later came to be completely discarded. Between 1920 and about 1970, the paradigm was that dinosaurs were cold-blooded, slow and stupid animals, very primitive creatures that could not be closely related to birds at all. The turning point came during the 1970s-1990s and findings in Manchuria and Mongolia of quite birdlike dinosaurs. They clearly had feathers, which was the first absolute *evidence* that at least some dinosaurs had feathers. They also showed skeletal similarities with birds and quite evidently they were fast. Feathers also indicate that they were warm blooded - the original purpose of feathers was most probably insulation, to keep warmth inside. Since then, there are a lot of findings and observations confirming the close relationship between dinosaurs and birds. There are so many fundamental similarities, and so many things we today see as typical for birds that were there already with the dinosaurs, that the closeness can no longer be denied. According to the present level of knowledge, birds did not only evolve from dinosaurs, ***they are dinosaurs***. Archaeopteryx & What it is to be a Bird It is justified to assume that Archaeopteryx is the world's most well-known fossil. It is sometimes described as a bird, sometimes not, it all boils down to definitions, but fact is that it triggered the idea that perhaps birds descend from dinosaurs the first time it turned up. It happened 1880, when Thomas Henry Huxley suggested that birds evolved from dinosaurs. He based this theory on a comparison of Archaeopteryx, generally considered to be an early bird, and bones from Theropod dinosaurs that were found in the same area. He found striking similarities. This is a photo from 1880 of a fossil of Archaeopteryx, the Berlin Archaeopteryx specimen. Legs and feathers were subsequently removed. Totally, 11 fossils of Archaeopteryx have been found. Most of them in Jurassic limestone in Bavaria (about 150 million years old).
Archaeopteryx was a long time considered as the oldest known fossil bird, because it had feathers. In German, it was even referred to as “Urvogel”, meaning “original bird”. This was based on the (erroneous) assumption that only birds had feathers. Only in the beginning of this century, findings of other feathered and birdlike fossils of about the same age in China have changed that view. Archaeopteryx is now increasingly re-classified as a dinosaur, but not a bird. This makes sense, because Archaeopteryx has some characteristics that are not birdlike. Indeed, they contradict the criteria for being a bird. The fact that it had feathers does not alone make it a bird, since it has now been understood that feathers existed before the evolution of birds. Archaeopteryx also had wings, but the skeletal structure doesn't support flight (although it had started to change in that direction), as it does in birds, so it is unclear if it could fly. Further, it had hollow bones with air sacs, so had at least some traditional non-avian dinosaurs as well. (More about that in a forthcoming article.) If feathers, wishbone, three-fingered hands, and robust forelimbs would make Archaeopteryx a bird, it certainly wasn't the first one. There were older species with these characteristics. However, according to the present standards of classification, there are further criteria for making something a bird, and these criteria are not satisfied. Archaeopteryx had teeth, a bird has not. It also had a long tail, while in birds, the tail has become very short, which is probably necessary for efficient flight. Further, birds have fused fingers, while Archaeopteryx could move each finger individually, and its fingers had claws. We are talking about ***hands****,* a part of the wings. Birds have claws, but not on the forelimbs. So, if Archaeopteryx was not a bird (Aves), what was it then? Well, just as all birds, it certainly was a dinosaur, most likely a transitional form between non-avian dinosaurs and birds; a dinosaur on its way to become a bird. If its line is the origin of birds is a matter of dispute, but I doubt that it was. Many parallel lines may have evolved and only one survived. Archaeopteryx is scientifically important, however, for our understanding of as well birds as dinosaurs and how theropod dinosaurs became birds. Etymology of Archaeopteryx The word “archaeopteryx” was coined by palaeontologist Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer. He based it on Ancient Greek ἀρχαῖος (arkhaîos, *“ancient”* or *“primitive”*); and Ancient Greek πτέρυξ (ptérux, *“wing”*). This discussion continues in A comparison of Birds and Their Ancestral Dinosaurs. https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/a-comparison-of-birds-and-their-ancestral-dinosaurs-232683b6 Related articles: To Revive an Extinct Dinosaur - Is it at all Possible? https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/to-revive-an-extinct-dinosaur-is-it-at-all-possible-c37386b9 How Can We Know Anything About Dinosaurs? https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/how-can-we-know-anything-about-dinosaurs-9e286d64 The Most Powerful Eyes https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/the-most-powerful-eyes-9dc49a42 Retrospection 4 https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/retrospection-4-0c1add0e **In my** **INDEX****, you can find all my writings on Read.Cash, sorted by topic.** https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/index-over-my-articles-at-read-cash-5f7c1e34 Copyright ©2019, 2022 Meleonymica/Mictorrani. All Rights Reserved. *(Thumbnail image by Gordon Johnson/Pixabay, CC0/Public Domain.)* Here you can find my articles about Palaeontology. https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/index-over-my-articles-at-read-cash-5f7c1e34#palaeontology-amp-evolution If you are interested in Evolution & Paleontology, a topic including Dinosaurs, join my community *"**Natural Science (1c4e)**".* https://read.cash/c/natural-science-1c4e My 5 most recent articles: Quizzes & Puzzles 1 https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/quizzes-puzzles-1-387570b5 Suggested Reading 19 https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/suggested-reading-19-419f66b5 How to Avoid Mental Decline: Neuroprotectors https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/how-to-avoid-mental-decline-neuroprotectors-0f3c9928 Before Western and Modern Medicine & Surgery II: The Great Physicians https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/before-western-and-modern-medicine-surgery-ii-the-great-physicians-d8533aa6 Before Western and Modern Medicine & Surgery I https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/before-western-and-modern-medicine-surgery-i-635674a5
23 comments
So interesting!! How many days you can survive, if you were in this oldest era?
Probably not for very long.
My friend this article was great, I never thought birds could be so closely related to dinosaurs. You raised a very interesting topic.
Thank you. There is a continuation of this discussion. I just published: https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/a-comparison-of-birds-and-their-ancestral-dinosaurs-232683b6
Thank you for always bringing me into another subject, I mean I didn't know this when I was in school
I'm glad if I can expand your mind and bring you into new subjects. Then my writing is doing good.
A comment out of context and I'm sorry for not staying on topic, I have a honest question, though. You seem to have no social media or links on your profile. Do you use such services to promote your content? I'd like to follow you on Twitter, Reddit, LinkedIn, or any other service you use. To put it simply, you get too many views in your articles. How do you do it? Is it the quality of the content that perhaps makes Google SEO to bring your content on top page of search results? I did some searches and doesn't seem like that. Can you share your secret?
I am publishing my own (paid) e-magazine since 2005 (with paper publications before that) and have many subscribers. I promote the links there. Most of my views comes from my subscribers for sure.
Thanks for replying. Good job on the views, indeed!!
On the content side, though. Not really interested. You just carefully reword wikipedia on each of your articles without a mention of your source. Nothing unique here. So, it would be better to unfollow me, not mention me again, and not comment "bs" in my articles again.
I never use wikipedia as a source, I have written material like this since before Wikipedia existed. But you are entitled to your opinion, of course. I will not care more for your writings though ,just as you wish.
Sure, you remember all these facts by hard. Dude, it is obvious you have sources you don't mention. Wikipedia may not be one, but the one you have is based on Wikipedia itself. If you just translate from Arabic as some other accounts were doing it is even worse. Look. You can't be an expert in everything. You have sources, and you never mentioned them.
Actually I DO remember, because all these things really interest me, and I am not translating anything unless I state that. Sorry, but you are sadly mistaken. False accusations are serious things.You better know what you talk about before saying something. I don't care if you don't like what I write, but I will not waste more time on groundless accusations.
Sure. You were on the verge of having me report you, but now I will. It is up to read.cash to decide now if you plagiarise content or not.
You better have proof before you report, because I will report you for bullying and verbal attacks.
Yeah, you are probably the same guy like one of those I reported. Do that, read.cash will find what you are doing and how you are achieving 500 views on each publication.
And I will block you, of course, your tone and attitude is not acceptable.
You also know how to write ancient Greek huh?
I do. And Egyptian Hieroglyphs,and Japanese, and many other languages. I am no young boy, I have a long scholarly life behind me, where studying various things have been the heart of my life.
Lol. Sure, and with all this knowledge and intelligence you just decided to exploit read.cash.
Anyway, enough time wasted with you. Won't see you again. Keep doing whatever you think works, you are not fooling too many.
In fact, I reported this comment, since you are clearly lying.
This one great subject and thank you for sharing this kind of article