The Comment League - Spurring Interaction

Not everyone is eligible for the activity bonus. A lot of users that I know for their reputation of reading and leaving g useful comments on articles were not eligible. It makes me wonder how they choose eligible users.

About reviewing comments from hundreds of articles. My plan is to work with other users, who will give weekly list of users who left useful comments on their numerous articles for the week. I will add such users to the the list and award points. The more me tions each user gets, the more. points they earn.

What if other users don't respond by submitting list of commenters? I will use just mine. I will award points to users that comment on my articles and at the end of the month, I will convert the points to BCH and award the amount as tip to the users

Gotcha, no, no one knows how are they chosen (probably just by continued activity) but most people we know here from months ago (formerly mentioned as 'power users') already got the bonus. Monolith is on day twelve since the bonus just showed up (after two or three days of been actively posting and answering comments), so it might be as simple as that, comment and post for a few days in a row.

You are welcome. While we hope on the dev to take necessary measures, we have our part to play. We all have a collective role to help the platform grow. We can always down vote or flag such comments.

I hope for your continuous suggestion on how to make this initiative successful

Yes. I always downvotes comment that i think is a spam. One thing that im bothered about is the A.I who gives tip. He set the rules but he is the one violating the rules he has set. I think he needs an update.

That will be up to read.cash dev. But for now, let's work on moving this initiative forward

Sure you can promote the initiative for as long as you want and also link the comment league community https://read.cash/c/the-league-8a2a

Join the telegram group if you can.

yes i will

With or without this information such contents will be generated we have no control of that.

Vetting every article and every article will be a huge one. Imagine having 50 or more participating authors submitting comments from 5-7 articles weekly. That's huge for anyone to vet.

Perhaps we should rule out health related articles? We should create a vetting team?

I have a plan to check every user on the leaderboard. They ensure their activity is genuine. Though the reward is not much, there is possibility of some authors creating multiple accounts to generate comments. It's also possible authors will give fake figures.

Perhaps for a user to be added as a participant, he must be mentioned by a certain number of authors, not just by one or two authors.

You have raised good concerns, the question now is how do we curb that?

i think if this initiative is to move forward, there is a need for several vetting teams to protect the community. teams should also include more than one individual who is knowledgeable about the subject.

there should also be a balance between correcting minor details, and flagging dangerously wrong information (scams, etc.)

These are the obvious topics/comments that would require careful review:

• health/medical advice
• money/investment/crypto advice
• legal advice

i'm sure there are more, but that's all i can think of at the moment.

i don't know how we would vet a medical/health related topics team. it may be easier to simply exclude those.

to prevent conflicts of interest, individuals should volunteer to be part of a vetting team (no compensation). furthermore, members of vetting teams should be ineligible for the Comment League awards. It would just look bad if anyone from the vetting team won awards.

i would consider signing up to be on one of the vetting teams, but i would need assistance.

this project sounds like more and more work, and it would require a lot of collaboration. i think we need to scale it down to authors submitting one entry weekly or monthly. i can't imagine the volume of information coming in to be managed and sorted...you would need a ton of help.

Thanks for the tip!

Your words are too kind. Have you joined the telegram group?

Yes just joined. Thanks for reminding ❤️

Exactly. We have become a trio, and we all motivate each other to put in max. effort. It's very helpful really, and I may have to read the mechanics of this to understand how it works.

Thank you for the positive feedback. I am still working on the mechanics. Any suggestion will be appreciated. It could be something you want to be incorporated or a way to make it effective.

I can see that it's already been mentioned, but yes, we do need a team to vet the entries and the articles involved, to ensure we don't fall into the same issues the read.cash admin had while trying to allocate points for comments and all that.

❤️❤️❤️

Yes, the participating author gives me the list of users and such users if not already on the leaders board will be added and award point for commenting on the article. Not just the best comment on an article, but as many users that leave relevant comment on the same article.

The authors can give the report in the comment section of the weekly update post or via the telegram group.

I have update the link to the group. It's working now. Thanks for pointing that out.

Thank you very much for the clarification. 👍

Sounds like a great idea to me. 👍

I tried,link is working.