Bitcoin cash; the effort no longer matters!
15th of May 2022
At this point I can say that the integrity of this platform and that of whoever is behind it has completely diminished to a point of no return, it is now at a point of zero trust and accountability, and in the next few months (I'd rather not give exact values) it will all be over.
You're probably wondering what I'm talking about, and a majority can only guess but wrongly. I choose to be vague as I do not intend to turn my comment section to a debate room or perhaps a court house for hearing, I'd rather not.
What does it matter anyway? Barely anyone reads my articles these days, and the few that do simply do it so the favour can be returned.
Names withheld but if you insist, I'd probably mention in my next article.
At this point, I do not care anymore whether anyone reads my articles or comments on them. As mentioned by @pantera, in Few Options Left After Bitcoin Cash Crashed Close To Historic Lows, the views no longer matter. I see articles with barely any views and have zero information to offer do better than articles written based on research and with a lot of views.
It's my definition of zero accountability from whoever is behind the reward system and something called favouritism.
Contrary to popular beliefs about the rewards being random, the rewards are no longer random but deliberately given to a certain percentage who have nothing to offer their readers but complain about how badly their day went and how the flowers in their garden reflects the beauty of nature, and blah blah.
As already stated above- favouritism!
A majority of whom can't differentiate between trading, farming, and staking in cryptocurrency- to them it's all considered trading. Thanks to zero intelligence and inability to open their minds to new ideas.
They lay low in their comfort zone and bask in unintelligence and receive large rewards from 'you know who', thus making them believe their writing is top tier and that they know how it works. Every other person is considered lazy, and when you ask why your rewards are less, they make up the excuse of "not enough interaction and engagement", even when your 'interaction and engagement' is higher than the @randomrewarder's favourite.
Once again, if you request for names to be mentioned, I gladly will.
I have considered the recent downfall in upvotes a deliberate act to torture my effort even when the quality of my articles have improved with a higher percentage of research based articles and top 10's and 5's of this and that, which provides value for the readers as opposed to articles about 'how a water bottle fell off my table and flooded my apartment thus resulting in being evicted by my wicked landlady'.
I see a lot of articles like that and it's just nonsensical. After reading such articles, I ask myself- 'now what?'. Value wasn't added, it was just another day of reading through thousands of zero quality articles because of something called BCH.
In the end, I can conclude that the popular and trending marketing of read.cash comes with the statement-"write whatever comes to mind as long as it's not plagiarized and you'd be rewarded. Rusty can't tell the difference".
A very wrong way of onboarding new users to a blogging platform that began with a high level of integrity and accountability.
Now, nobody seems to care anymore and all we see is zero value and meaningless content.
It would cost me nothing to do the same, and I will as from tomorrow. I'd simply wake up in the morning and write about how I couldn't sleep at night but rolled from one edge of my bed to the other. Don't blame me, writing such articles pay more than writing articles than add values.
I will no longer stress myself to write accurately, neither will I bother to read anyone else's articles since it makes no difference.
Views and interaction no longer matters, comments died a long time ago and each writer/reader on this platform has his or her own favourite. So why bother myself when the result will be the same regardless of effort.
Oh my! I may be guilty as charged as my articles are somewhat related to the content. Well, with the invitation and the welcome article from Read.cash, abiding with it simple rules and all others, I survived 7 months writing. I stayed and kept on writing because I was thinking of honing the skills I never knew I have and for the months had past I would say I'd improved. I'm not keen to audience in real life so I never opted for audience in this platform. Not that I detest it, I just dont like the crowd. Attracting their attention, I don't have any idea but I seem to have gained some attention. Don't get me wrong but I'm not enjoying the attention, perhaps, there are just people whom our interest just jived on. Honestly, I only know a person here and that's the one who referred me to the site. I don't have other platforms, I may have joined others but this is the only one I am active with so far though, I'm only frequent with Pinterest and FB, other than that, nothing else.
Well, I'm earning but not as much as you and other prominent writers in this site does, which I do envy but I am still growing, so... It's just plain statement, I do envy you and others, just that. I stayed because I wanted to learn more and that reading articles here is somewhat contributory to everything I've learned so far. And in as much as I'd like to make articles such as yours, eloquently written but I lack the growth and experience you have. Perhaps in due time I will but that easier said than done.
"write whatever comes to mind as long as it's not plagiarized and you'd be rewarded. Rusty can't tell the difference".
Rusty can tell the difference, if I may but I'd rather not stress since my comment is already long and stressing this would make it too long... Actually, this is my aim to understand the behaviour which is why I am studying the articles written and compared it to the ones I am writing and others as well. Still not there but I already see some points that'll support my claim. Thank u for sharing. 'til your next article, see u around.