This is the gender I want!
It has been a rainy day today. I actually didn’t go outside and as much as possible, I stay at home, writing every draft that I can. My head hurts due to some stress in school because I am finding money to buy my new laptop since the one I am using right now is not compatible with my upcoming thesis. Gosh! It was yesterday when I was whacking my brain about where to find money or whether even an installment laptop was okay for me. Anyways, it is my problem to solve so I better find a solution for it as early as possible.
In the meantime, I am starting to draft so many blogs in my Google Docs because I think I would be busy these in the coming weeks. Like, the hardest part of being a graduating student is the thesis itself. I just wanted to sigh about all the problems and forgot them for a day. Anyways, this would be another question-and-answer portion which is quite debatable if we look at and analyze the question closely.
What makes each human unique?
Will it be sufficient to say that we are just unique toward each other and to all the living things existing? I have watched multiple documentaries about why human is becoming more the center of this world as we dominate all forms of life. However, we cannot deny that humans are still vulnerable and have multiple weaknesses. We’re nowhere near perfection, but since we are similar to the image of God, then I can say that our physical attributes are definitely unique.
A higher chance of uniqueness of each human is based on their skill set, we are born differently with a natural talent and wisdom. To be precise, the potential of an individual will come out entirely dissimilar to one another even though they are with similar talents. I mean, it is a matter of developing and how much it takes time for you to realize your talent. It is not simple to walk and just begin your journey without even realizing what’s happening.
Can wrong actions be excused and accepted if the outcome is for the greater good of society?
It is actually hard to say that we have to normalize the wrong actions to be accepted just because it has a more significant cause for society. Isn’t it just patronizing to do bad actions even though it’s not ethical and moral? I think the concept here is that the good actions will be covered by bad actions and later on, bad actions will be the new norms. It is and should not be that way. It expresses that the meaning of right and wrong will be useless to us all.
The greater good of society is not to be based on the cause which triggers a ripple of bad actions. It is supposed to be coming from the good cause that ripples a sequence of good actions which affect many people. I would consider doing bad actions when a life is at stake because life is more valuable than any beliefs. Whether the doer has not good intentions, but it saves a life, then it would be acceptable to me.
Why must all individuals conform to the gender roles described by society?
It is not required to conform to the gender roles assigned and described by society because it is our right to hide a personal identity if we want. I think the main goal of society is to label our gender so that it would be easier to classify us. However, not everyone is happy talking about gender roles since it’s sensitive. Not everyone is open to talking about it. A gender role should be picked and chosen by ours, and ours to tell us not to conform.
Thanks for sponsorship.
My previous articles you might love to read:
Ako din Marc pag umuulan natatamad ako lumabas. Dito lang din ako sa kwarto. Nagkukulong lang. Walang gana lumabas.