Drastic decline in wildlife populations

12 53
Avatar for sandra22
3 years ago

Wildlife populations declined by 68% between 1970 and 2016, and only 25% of the planet, parts not under ice, can still be considered wild.

This means that man has altered three-quarters of the planet that is not covered by ice. Only 13% of the world's ratings can be considered still untouched wilderness. The grim statistics come from a report by the non-profit World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the London Zoological Society (ZSL), based on global data on 20,811 populations of 4,392 vertebrate species. The devastation of wildlife populations has hit Latin America and the Caribbean the hardest, with animal populations declining by an average of 94% over the period.

Population declines of 65% in Africa, 34% in North America, 45% in the Asia-Pacific region, and 24% in Europe and Central Asia, including Russia.Food production is the biggest driver of wildlife loss, the report says, because now about half of the world's habitable land is already used for agriculture. Other factors such as insufficiently fast and efficient response to climate change, habitat loss due to various reasons, pollution and urbanization are also responsible for population decline and declining biodiversity.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also affected the acceleration of wildlife loss, as well as more frequent and large-scale fires across the planet such as those earlier this year in Australia, and fires currently active in California and Oregon. Fires contribute about 10% of global carbon dioxide emissions, which is the trigger for climate change. This report also refutes the widespread belief that "nature is renewed" during this pandemic.Humans are currently looking for 1.6 times more resources than what the Earth can renew.

That is, we as a species live beyond our means. Our needs for food and housing are at the expense of the wild. According to this report, about 30% of the land is used for agriculture, but at the same time about one third of the food is thrown away.

The loss of biodiversity is not only a matter of environmental protection but also of development, economy, global security, and ethics. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in the supply of food, water, energy, medicine, and is crucial for the regulation of climate on our planet, water quality, pollination services, flood control and storm surges.

15
$ 0.85
$ 0.85 from @TheRandomRewarder
Sponsors of sandra22
empty
empty
empty
Avatar for sandra22
3 years ago

Comments

The human factor is to blame for everything. It is a terrible pity what was done.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

It is unfortunate that we have done so much damage to this planet, in part we are even consciously doing so.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Very informative post about pandemic

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Sad reality. 🙁 I can see how the fields and mountain that I used to play when I was a child is now full of establishments and some became roads. 🙁🙁

$ 0.00
3 years ago

It is unfortunate that we have done so much damage to this planet, in part we are even consciously doing so. We have to protect it because we and the animals depend on it ...

$ 0.00
3 years ago

And poaching is to blame for the loss of wildlife 😔

$ 0.00
3 years ago

nice post, like mass, little but sweet

$ 0.00
3 years ago

To be honest, the man, in addition to fear, brought great relief to nature and the animal world. We ie. We think that humanity is endangered by wild animals and that nature is ruthless towards us when tsunamis and hurricanes start, and we do not realize how much we are destroying everything around us for the sake of our luxurious life. Air pollution is more unbearable. But that is why every house has steam heating and boilers that are heated by burning coal or fuel oil. Every household has at least one car ... a diesel of course. Garbage from plastic bottles on all sides, plastic bags, horror ... I think that nature is a little sacred to us for our carelessness and arrogance.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer animals in nature, my grandfather told me, when he was 10 he saw wild animals in the woods every day at 30 every other day he saw wolves, foxes, martens at the age of 50 once a week and at 70 very rarely or almost never, it proves how much nature has changed and will only change, we will not be able to see a rabbit in the forest let alone a wolf or a jackal.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Too bad our animals are dying out. Nature in general. If there is no nature, there is no us.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Many animal species are threatened with extinction.Unfortunately, we are facing difficult times.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

You red a lot of mine article about spices vanishing toward human activity. Even we do that with no purpose to mange our work places and increase production and consumption as a basis for reproduction of human society, we need to stay and take deep breath and make sure is it last or one of lasts..

$ 0.00
3 years ago