Join 82,097 users already on read.cash

The great sabotage of Bitcoin and the resurgence of the White Paper as Bitcoin Cash

12 494 exc
Avatar for IanBlas
Written by   53
1 year ago

Understanding BCH as money

The fiat currencies that we use today are money based on credit (debt obligations of the issuer), that is, their value depends on the future behavior of the debtor (in this case, central banks).

Then we could conclude that the current money does not have a backing, since it does not represent any real asset such as gold or silver.

This is a mistake, since central banks - and ultimately states - are obliged to accept fiat currency in exchange for canceling debts against it. They force themselves to accept it, no matter who owns the money. Therefore, fiat currency is a liability of the central bank, a credit that we use as currency. But ... it is important to note that if the debtor sinks, the credit issued is in default and its price falls to zero.

Let's compare it to Bitcoin. What happens if a miner dies, disappears or goes bankrupt? Nothing. It is irrelevant. The value of Bitcoin depends on the qualities inherent in the system and the usefulness that its users find in those qualities. Therefore, Bitcoin is not credit, it is not anyone's liability: it is money; Bitcoin extinguishes debts.

Money is a social institution that has evolved over time, which is used to carry out indirect exchanges of goods and services between people. Thanks to money, we avoid falling into friction and inefficiencies inherent in bartering.

So, one wonders why some goods become widely used money and others do not ...

For Mises, a certain good is money if it meets the regression theorem. In other words, for a good to become money, it must be sued for reasons other than monetary ones; it must have a previous use before being money, as in the case of gold, which was used and continues to be used to make jewelry. The case of cryptocurrencies is curious and particular, because being digital they appear to have no merchandise value (such as silver or salt).

How then is the value of Bitcoin explained? When people demand a certain good, they generate signals that we call prices. These ultimately depend on people's subjective choice, on the utility they find in the good in question. If no one found use in the use of Bitcoin, it would not be in demand and therefore would not have a price.

Over the years, money evolved into increasingly efficient ways to fulfill monetary functions. Nowadays, the blockchain protected by proof of work allows to have an intangible, decentralized monetary asset free from intermediaries. This is what gives Bitcoin regressive value: its decentralized and untouchable payment system. The monetary unit integrated into said system simply expresses that value when it is listed.

This native payment network that transports value through time and space, solving one of the biggest problems of today's money, which is its centralization (central banks) and intermediaries (private banks), is what gives regression value to Bitcoin

It is very important to understand that the value of bitcoin (the monetary unit) is not independent of your payment network (Bitcoin, the system).

Demand problems

The growing demand to transact on the Bitcoin blockchain was seen by Blockstream as an opportunity to centralize development (in the case of Bitcoin BTC) and move most of the transactions off the blockchain, towards "solutions. "Very similar to those offered by the banking system.

By imposing a space production quota on each block of transactions, with the idea of ​​scaling forward into second layers, Blockstream's paid developers increased transaction costs to levels never seen before.

By refusing to cover the demand with larger blocks, and instead promoting the use of a technology that did not exist at the time (Lightning Network) instead of letting the system evolve naturally with demand, the rates skyrocketed and this put an end to the adoption of Bitcoin as a currency. The market reaction was clear: many services that accepted Bitcoin stopped doing so, and people stopped using Bitcoin for the purpose for which it was originally created. This is how the bitcoinization of the prices of goods and services was limited, and therefore the natural expansion of Bitcoin.

New mindset vs original idea

With the hardfork, the community was divided into 2: on the one hand BTC, with a contradictory discourse of high fees that are considered desirable but at the same time are denied; on the other hand BCH (Bitcoin Cash), faithful to the original idea of Satoshi Nakamoto (p2p electronic cash).

On the BTC side they realized that talking about Bitcoin as money, but at the same time limiting it to such a thing, is an insurmountable contradiction, and they had to resort to massive censorship to impose a discourse full of contradictions. Over time, they decided to redefine Bitcoin as "digital gold", thus perverting the original idea of a digital cash system capable of scaling to be massively used.

The massive loss of value

The inability to use BTC for everyday transactions not only generated an anti-adoption of the currency, but also led to the loss of regressive value by making it impossible to use the valuable blockchain for all types of transactions.

We can mention the typical case of someone who buys a coffee that is worth 1 dollar and has to pay 5 dollars (or 10, or 50) as a transition fee. Let's imagine another case in which we want to pay for electricity automatically every 1 hour, or receive payments in exchange for the energy generated by our solar panels. It is clear that all this is impossible to do onchain (using the blockchain) in BTC.

Every time one mentions this to a BTC maximalist, the answer is that for these types of transactions there is the Lightning network, but its mathematical and practical limitations are not taken into account, such as the need to be online to receive or send payments, or the need to conduct onchain transactions to open and close channels on the lightning network. It is as if they have forgotten that Bitcoin has value thanks to the blockchain, and therefore to stop using it or reserve its use for megabanks and magnates to adjust their balances from time to time undermines the monetary qualities of Bitcoin.

However, the currency that stays true to Satoshi Nakamoto's original idea can satisfy that demand for monetary use for transactions of any amount. With Bitcoin Cash it is not necessary to go through third-party payment channels and depend on their balances, nor is it necessary to appeal to intermediaries to lower costs or to improve the user experience. It is the original Bitcoin, and as such it keeps the regression value intact.

Conclusion:

In a sense, it can be said that Bitcoin lacks support, because there is no entity that supports the value of monetary units with its assets. But this could be precisely interpreted as its main advantage, since lacking support in this sense also means that there is no counterparty risk. This advantage is shared by Bitcoin Cash with precious metals.

Now if by backup we mean the ability of the system itself to retain its usefulness as it scales to serve the entire world, it can be argued that Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has the strongest of backups, while Bitcoin BTC is destined to go losing it as more users are kicked off its blockchain.

It can be said then that it is the monetary qualities of BCH, and its ability to preserve them regardless of the number of users who adopt the system, which "support" its value.

Sponsors of IanBlas
empty
empty
empty

17
$ 14.49
$ 9.57 from @TheRandomRewarder
$ 1.00 from @SofiaCBCH
$ 1.00 from @btcfork
+ 7
Avatar for IanBlas
Written by   53
1 year ago
Enjoyed this article?  Earn Bitcoin Cash by sharing it! Explain
...and you will also help the author collect more tips.

Comments

Much is correct, but I don't understand which myth you actually want to bust. There is confusion between the title here and the title on https://read.cash/@SofiaCBCH/2020-myth-hunter-ranking-44ae7251

Anyway, have some votes!

30 Myth hunter votes

$ 0.00
1 month ago

I don't agree. With the advent of bitcoin, the regression theorem was proven wrong.

The value comes from demand to own, which again comes from its properties, and the fact that others agree, giving it liquidity. All good qualities are no good unless there also is liquidity, because that is what gives it the usefulness in lubricating trade. Even if liquidity was low in the beginning, it got value due to speculation of future liquidity.

$ 0.00
2 months ago

Many are just after the fact that Bitcoin has a really large market cap and has a higher value now but they don't consider the transaction the and other facts making them chose that . But with Bitcoin Cash you have all such petty things . Kudos Bitcoin Cash

$ 0.00
1 year ago

I don't really understand what you are saying here even if i translated it to english, i mean i need to learn more about this crypto currencies for me to understand it better.. Nevertheless i can say that this has been well explained.

$ 0.00
11 months ago

gracias por este super articulo, me encanto leerlo y tambien lo compartire en mis redes muchas gracias Dios te bendiga...

$ 0.05
11 months ago

Me alegra mucho que te haya gustado!. Y muchas gracias por compartirlo, también lo tengo en español publicado https://read.cash/@IanBlas/el-gran-saboteo-de-bitcoin-y-el-resurgir-del-white-paper-como-bitcoin-cash-9d449081

$ 0.00
11 months ago

It's vary greatfull article dear and helpful 😘😘

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Why BCH people clings to the idea that BTC cannot be used for daily transactions? Yes I understand that you want to use the blockchain for tipping, gambling on roulette and buying coffees on Antigua. but you DON'T NEED the blockchain to do that. TODAY there is a HUGE infrastructure to use Bitcoin off chain for daily transactions, almost free, way faster than BCH. yes, custodial and non-custodial too. So if you keep fighting a lost fight the only loser will be you. WAKE UP people. do it for you!

$ 0.00
1 year ago

The interesting thing about Bitcoin is the blockchain, limiting its uses is not good for adoption

$ 0.02
1 year ago

the blockchain is just one part of bitcoin. you can copy it, change it, using it whatever you like, but that doesn't mean that what you are doing have any value.

BUT

If I give you some bitcoins, no matter if is on a centralized exchange, or on a custodial wallet, or a no-custodial wallet, or directly with a node, or even a piece of paper, it has the same value.

In fact, if more people create services on top of bitcoin, no matter what kind, on-chain, off-chain, centralized, custodial or whatever, it gives more value to bitcoin, no less.

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Thank you! "Bitcoin BTC is destined to go losing it as more users are kicked off its blockchain." https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/tx/f3ca3d72f73a84f266a6a6a2d80a3dbcdd686d18b39b375c57f1886f0f170ad8

$ 0.00
1 year ago

The inability to scale has direct effects on adoption as a currency of daily use

$ 0.00
1 year ago