The Presidential Interview: Vote– not to vote.
Media is media, they are a group of smart and elite people that were inside the television of social network infrastructure. They could do things in their creative way as they knew that freedom, rights and things were an expression of their entitlement. If you reach the point where all the information you had was only relying on the media, you should vote, not to vote, read why.
Sound idealistic somehow that the sources of your information were the news, or the featured episode in the social media, never think that somehow it was obtusely manipulated, it was crumpled and designed that people should look upon.
I read people articles last night about the presidential debate. They talked about the moment they listened, not realizing that questions didn't fit on the trending happening in the Philippines. People had different political opinions and perspectives. But some people really rely only on what they hear, not what they see.
Imagine that you heard a sound of birds, then you knew it was a bird, but you saw it was a person that was acting the sound of the noisy feathered one. You still believed that it was a bird for you heard it on your own, even closer to the view it was the hunter whistling like a bird. You still come close because it was a bird-like you knew, then you were hunted. For you already saw it was a human who's whispering and faking things yet you still believed in it. Well, smart people could analyze what I said for sure.
People are easily manipulated by what they hear. FOMO (Fear of Missing out) you heard your neighbour that there is something, and you get curious. You wanted to look at it for sure not to be late for those things.
What was the question that was tackled in the interview? Had you absorbed it? Had you found the question you looking for? For just because it was threading you just watched? No question at all? Then now question yourself, are you satisfied with those answers?.
‘What was the most expensive thing that you own?’ really? And more things.
We are poor and we must look at how people become rich?
They talked about fake news, Covid vaccinations and many more. But no one asked how to feed the 110-Million Filipinos. Aren't we not learning from the previous lock-downs where most of our co-Filipino are hungry, aren’t we learning from what past officials gave? So basically we can't demand it at all. If there will again surge and massive lock-downs, we will again receive canned goods, rice with something in smell and taste, a government subsidy.
Basically, all the questions and propaganda they thought won't be valid if the people are hungry.
Hungry people will lead to more and more angry ones, looting, terrorism and even force doing bad things.
No questions related to high prices of goods in the market. You haven’t seen in your eyes that one peso in our country was so small when we went to buy our needs. Because you heard one thousand pesos, you believed it was a huge amount. But when you see how one thousand pesos goes and what it could bring to your family, you will realize that inflation and economics are somehow undervalued yet they don’t have the chance to be discussed. why? Because they focus on the media, people who have access to the internet, while people who don’t have any idea what computer they left behind because they can't react to the Facebook post of the politicians.
They don’t see how hard farming was in the Philippines, they just heard that farmers get more loans, so they should budget for more loans that will lead more to depressing farmers. In other countries, when you get the name ‘Farmer’ you were rich because you own a huge acre of field, but the place I was, when you were a farmer you were classified as poor.
Yet it's expensive to do farming here, no questions asked about high prices of seeds, fertilizers and even equipment? Why did they have a backup plan to import goods? So what happened to the farmers of the Philippines they will leave behind.
When you are just heating your supporting aspirant while you don’t see if feasible or not, acceptable or unalienable the platform is.
Food, that's the most important issue in our days now, not Martial law, not the Lugaw, not the IQ of the boxer, not the Mayor and everything.
We just heard them, we don’t yet see if those will really have an outcome, but the issues that we suffered every day, food security, farmers' opportunity wasn’t included. Why? Because they can't react to the social media status of the politicians, those urban poor think it's fine with canned goods and fast food.
This is just my view of why I am disappointed and labelled the some questioned lame ones. Because hunger as an issue wasn't posted on social media they won't take a look at that, well how nice that media cover poor people but ended just a cover, no filters.
Just my thoughts I am Agriculturist that's my view, no hate or drama hehe. Thanks for reading…
This is why Ka Leody is the best president for the common Filipino. It is sad they chose not to include him in the interviews at all. They seem to be discriminating against him which is sad.