@Nghiacc

(comment) Yes this is my choice however I think it is not just for myself, but also it brings opportunity for crypto developers via stable funding as well as for Users and Miners who will now have more says i...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Good luck with your investment. I hope they won't dump on me as i already fund them via block rewards. I believe with the right model, they will be incentivized to become one of the major crypto cur...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks. Will do an article on what is GNC and how it works.

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks a lot! Good luck to you too! Yes Bitcoin Cash is still very popular, and read.cash is good too.

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Appreciate your comments. They do have a smaller team, however they are quite focused and have stable funding. Hope there will be more support in the future, the team needs to prove themselves first...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks!

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks for your wish!

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Good things with split is that everyone has a new star!

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) That is inherent with multiple node implementation. If chain split is not for use, choose a chain with single node implementation

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) I see. I believe the GNC will unify all stakeholders so that they collaborate to avoid network split. Multiple implementations do often lead to splits, which is still an issue with BCH/BCHN. Hope th...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) It is up to you. I am just giving the numbers. Why is Flipstarter better?

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Appreciate your comments! Yes it will be interesting to see if the people will give support to developers or still treat them as third class citizens, living of donations. It is a real struggle for...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Understand. ABC is the first mover. When there is incentive at stake, then developers will find ways to compete and take money away from ABC. When IBM was dominating, Apple and Microsoft found ways...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) I would say the market is still early enough for an experiment. The average users who want to get into crypto are still huge compared to the crypto nerds or traders. They need something more user fr...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks for your comments. Good to see the revised term is fine for both sides.

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Since there is still a possibility that other node implementations may follow the IFP chain, so it is not correct to say BCHN follow ABC chain. But I see your point. I have updated the picture for I...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) There are 2 governances with IFP. Network governance still remain the same, follow Nakamoto concensus by Miners PoW voting. Funding governance is defined as GNC, manages the funding resulted from ne...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) I understand, however I am just stating the facts that I know how the rules are currented coded. At this point, I don't know if the manual intervention will ever happen, so I cannot speculate. Techn...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) No problem. I just made it simply by saying the BCHN will split with 10 block ahead, which will trigger the finalisation rule and cause the chain split. For manual splitting of the chain, that would...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Make sense. Just updated to reflect that funding will be done not through the coinbase

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) I see your point. I think the statement is meant for high probability of chain split happen with that condition. But I agree all is probability, smaller hash can have a possibility of pulling ahead...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Correct, because the legacy BCH or the BCHN chain does not have the new coinbase rule or GNC so it is still based on offchain funding model, such as donation, flipstarter, corporate sponsorship. I w...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) That is interesting, many sources have been telling me that more than 50% hashrate for more than 10 blocks is needed for a BCHN chain being created by the inbuilt rules without manual intervention....

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Understand your point, it is possible for manual intervention, and even a new software can be patched to avoid the reorg, however it does represent a risk, do you agree?

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Do you mind to share me a couple of agenda from each team? How can we ensure they are all targeting the same goals?

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) I see. The point is about the lead developer, not about someone controlling the whole network since the network is decentralized by PoW nature and Nakamoto consensus. Anyway, I have removed the lead...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Ok. Thanks. Anyway, I have just updated the infographic to state clearly this is about funding goverance, not the network goverance. In that sense, the decision making is also Funding decision makin...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) As for businesses, a vision and a roadmap is critical to build on. Yes things can be changed due to market conditions but if you are building a business on a chain, then you would be better to know...

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Ok I will take it that no lead developer and no core team for BCHN. For funding, I already stated privately funded, so direct donations and corporate sponsorships fall into the private funding also....

@nghiacc 3 years ago

(comment) Just looked through the links and various other places, I will take it that Bitcoin Cash has no lead developers and even core teams. As for the governance, can you share what is the market base gove...

@nghiacc 3 years ago