Pros and Cons of Cigarette Smoke: State Revenue or Health
Attention: this article is only for appeal to everyone and does not have assumptions to justify or blame the parties involved because the purpose of this article is only to provide an overview of what is happening in the community.
Almost everyone knows that smoking can be detrimental to health and it can no longer be hidden among the general public, but in fact what has happened is that this appeal no longer seems to be a suggestion of a strong warning to the public because cigarette smoke never stops blowing from some people's mouths. In Indonesia, almost all the way logos or posters are erected about the dangers of smoking cigarettes but this does not affect active smokers. The warning from the government from the establishment of this logo or poster may just be a work program that must be realized in order for the program to be successful, but is there any impact for positive change? this is always the question.
Some people think that smoking is very difficult to get rid of because the reduction does not stop from time to time. A silly question that often comes out of some people is why the government doesn't issue a law to ban smoking or sanctions for smokers and only issue warnings? It is true that ordinary people also issue this assumption or question, but they may also have other assumptions about cigarettes that are not as dangerous as drugs.
smoking is indeed difficult to give up and that is what I feel and object to some people also to let go of this filter kretek, a habit that has stuck and is difficult to avoid or means that it has been addicted. From various sources that have been MANAGED INTO ONE ASSUMPTION, it is said that someone who stops smoking under the age of 45 years can restore their physical condition. This also gives the assumption that if you have passed the age of 45 years and are still smoking, your physical condition may no longer be able to return to its prime.
It can't be stopped because government regulations regarding CUSTOMS LAW have had an impact on state revenue or pockets. Taxes from cigarettes may have provided a large supply of state income and this is probably my own assumption about the cigarette tax that has been issued and passed.
Maybe the meaning of a health will come from each individual and cannot be forced because everyone's right is their own.
*****
Even if the government increased the tax of cigarettes, there are still people who will buy because it have a chemical called "nicotine" that makes them addicted...