Summary

Written by Curiouscat

I wrote a story, about a man,

Who steal and stab someone.

I wrote a poem, about freedom,

About joy, pain, and wisdom.

I shared what I ate,

And how my day went.

I asked others, compliment them.

Give my opinions and praises.

I make mistakes,

You're, your, interchanged.

Misspelled words, typographical errors.

Words that made someone disturbed.

But someone loved my literary pieces.

They even give rewards with emoji kisses

We interact and become friends.

Now, we have our own community hoping it'll not end.

If I publish this poem alone is it a quality content?

We always wanted to create and published contents that other users can be labeled as an article with a good quality. But, who are them to say you have or didn't have this on your article? Of course! They absolutely have the "say" whether it is a quality content or not because simply, your readers are your audience. They are the ones who read what you've written-does it makes sense? Is your article relatable enough? Informative? Fun?

I don't limit "good articles" with those with superb choice of words and excellent organization of the ideas in the Article as well as grammatically correct sentences. While all these are great elements of literary piece, it is not just about the technicalities at all. The random articles that we publish from time to time, the choice of words like using taglish is still considered as of "good quality" if the whole message of the Article make sense. Even the randomness of the article give impact and let the readers relate to it is still a quality content. People learn not just by those informative stuffs but also from those experiences by other people that they shared.

Those poems, stories (fictional or true to life), hobbies, recommendation stuffs, food blog, fashion, etc., are all sensible articles as long as the goal of the writer to express and share is there.

I have a lot of writers here that I admired for various of reasons. They are all unique.

So, not because someone has a different style of writing doesn't mean that he or she is a bad author. Everyone has their own way of sharing. And I believe that every one have the rights to change or explore other style if they want and improvements are always there.

I wrote the poem above and had it titled as "Summary", because that is how I summarize the point of this article-quality content and engagements.

Engagements in various community and users here in readcash is really vital. Aside from being known to others and getting the high chance of gaining subscribers, engaging let us meet people and understand the diverse culture our world has. It's like travelling around the world for free through reading and interactions. It also help us gain ideas what to write, learn new things, widen our understanding, and enjoy this platform as a whole.

Read.cash and BCH let me experience financial freedom but it gave me a lifetime access to the lives of people all around the world. The experience and how it give me the chance to enhance my skills on writing is what I will always be grateful for.

This is an entry for @Jane competition. If you want to join, learn about it through clicking the link of her Article below:

https://read.cash/@Jane/turning-2-years-old-community-engagement-writing-challenge-3bf6ebdf

Thank you for reading (☆▽☆)

Juungle address

simpleledger:qrspaea2vw6vejq3y7a3ngxxchwgjs2z9cywtr0a8v

SmartBCH

0xAD2B1235E337Ce7364df88828Eb30D0E20230D5D

BCH

bitcoincash:pprnxxgxkdlgq5y52uwzmrvq2g0r4vupps4v9xz5u9