As we go through many administrations every six years, we can truly define who really ruled and governed the country very well. A good governance can be identified by people with different criteria. But, little did we know, there are real criteria where we can define a good governance.
The lesson about “Good Governance,” helps me to know which of the politicians had a good governance. But first, there are two agents in governance, the follower and leader. Being a leader doesn’t mean that all you have to do is to lead and rule that followers.
Being a good leader in order to governed in a good way, you have to follow and hear out what your followers might say and suggest. Also, governing the country of a specific group, you all have to be transparent, responsible, have equity, accountability, participation, and etc.
Governing is not that easy, there are many hindrances that may ruin of break the governance. It can e the distance between the follower and the leader, distortion, semantics, being pressured by the tasks, having a selective perception of being biased, and having a personal incompatibility wherein, the decisions between the two agents are not approved by different sides.
It is hard to achieve the common good and common goal of every group so the agents, followers and leaders should help each other to have and achieve the good governance.
This article is very interesting and informative. Your writing style is very good. Keeping your writing. I am waiting.