Did you read the article first before you reject it?
Are you just based on the title and not it's content?
If yes, why do you reject it if it is related to the title of your community and if he/she has followed its rules?
And the hardest thing you can reject without reason?
It is important that you have a reason to reject it because the writer knows where he/she is lacking even though he/ she knows that his topic is relevant to your community and how to improve his/her writing skills if you always reject it.
How if read cash implements the rules about submitted only 1 community in 1 article?
Then you reject it again so where he/she can submit his article that fits the community?
I just noticed today that it is difficult to write an article in which category you submit or what community.
Because I feel some users here or new users that they exert time or effort to write that content then if they submit it to the community always rejected it, it's really gonna painful and discouraging some writers to write more because on this happened.
Yes, we respect the rules of communities and your decision to reject it but before you reject it, give some quick time to read the content first and do not base on the title.
Some moderators should really work on that.
That's the problem today.
Voice of all.
I am sorry to say so but people do not read. They simply pick the first communities they see. Do some research. Have a look at all those communities added to one single post which has nothing to do with the subject of the community.
A good example is my community Stories/Tales. I hardly see a real story or tale and by that, I mean the fairy tale, a story told by storytellers, you read in a book. Not your personal life.
The community Diaries: all kinds of posts are added but no Diaries.
The community Parenting is for parents, not for children to thank dad on father's day.
I can go on and on but the reality tells me something different.
Next to this, we set a limit if it comes to the number of words we ask. We want people to take care of grammar. Most refuse, they do not care if you reject.
At times it's hard to know what precisely a moderator has in mind for his community. I have been rejected too and I don't care. At least I know now that what I write doesn't fit in there so I won't request again and remove the community from my list.
I assume most moderators or at least the ones left to do their best. They all try to build a good community and this is time-consuming. While you post one post after the next we hardly come to writing. Moderating, commenting makes us earn nothing. Not one single point for advising others.
We all have to deal with one community only. This means: you puck the best one and check one day later if it's accepted. If not you try again. Is there something to lose? I don't think so. Most communities are not featured. If your post is accepted by a featured one it's still questionable if you receive points and if so what their value is.
I still have zero points which means I am the worst writer on this platform and clearly do not deserve to earn here or?