The goal of this article is to empower men and boys against the oppression of the state. At first, it will discuss, what method the state is using to oppressing men. In the second part, it will discuss how to use Cryptocurrency to fight against this oppression. Lets see a few examples of this: Rape as a crime - and it does not exists. Rape is a social construct, to opress the male gender and male sexuality. This is why the title "Rape does not exists" was given to this article. Rape is an imaginary crime to demonize male sexual behavior.
The modern western state is oppressing men.
Men dont have reproductive rights, they dont have rights for they own children. Men dont have rights for self-protection, men dont have equality before the law. For example, laws for domestic violence only punishing men, and they are not real crimes (like, slapping someone). Slapping a women is a crime, meanwhile slapping a men is just a joke, at least according to the law codex of the opressive feminist law system. In the case of the divorce, a man loses all of his rights for his property, his money, and for his children. Men does not have rights to own money and property, and forced to pay alimony, child support for the rest of his life. Men does not have rights for the children, yet they bear all the obligations of having a children. (https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/ ) Even in the case of having a prenuptial agreement, its automatically invadated by the court if it favours the man. Boys are opressed in school system, girls get better grades even for the same performance, and the majority of college students are women. For the same crime, men get about three times more punishment ( https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742?guccounter=1 ).
Based on this short but not complete list, we can identify that a typical western-type state is oppressing men on three main ways:
1. Sexual oppression
2. Social oppression
3. Economical oppression
There is overlap in this three main cathegory, some forms of oppression may fit into one, some may fit into two, and some may fit into all of this three category.
Sexual oppression: expressing male sexuality is criminalized
Men are not just stripped from reproductive rights, men are also subject of imaginary crimes, such as sexual harrasment or rape. In a western type feministic terrorstate, nowdays everything can be identifyed as a rape. Drinking alcohol in a bar and having sex? Rape. Rape, because you forced that poor girl to drink alcohol. The dirty men is having magic powers to bring the women to the bed, and when he does it, thats a rape. Having sex with a 17 year old girl? Rape. You maybe didnt even had sex with someone, but she says you had: rape. Or at least, harrasment. Slapping on the dancers ass in a bar is also a harrasment, and it costs you 20 months of salary, according to the oppressive feministic state of South Korea ( https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-club-idUSKCN1UN01B ), which has 0.9 childbirth/woman due to its extremeist opression of the male gender ( https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/forget-norths-nukes-south-koreas-other-big-problem-inevitable ).
Illustration: anti-male hate propaganda in a modern South Korean online newspaper. Portraying men as predators with imaginary crimes, and hiding deadly anti-male crimes on the side. By the next day, they erased it alltogether, and kept the imaginary crimes in the headlines.
The rape-myth is the foundation of the enslavement of the male gender
The feministic terror undermined the christian and asian society based on the demonization of male sexuality. One of the main tool to achieve this, is the rape-hysteria, and the second one, is the systematic undermine of the male reproductive rights. The key for totalitarian oppression of the male gender is to convience everybody about the inferiority of the male sexuality. Portraying men as violent rapists, stripping every basic human rights from them, including rights to own money, rights to housing, reproduction, sexuality, freedom, are the constructions that opened the path of enslaving the male gender as a whole.
Rape and sexual harrasment does not exists
The main problem of rape is that its canot be proven. Its not possible to prove if sex was happening with or without consent. Rape is not a crime on its own, to force down someone, the victim must be brutally beaten somehow, or the victim must be much smaller. Beating someone so much that the person gets brutal injuries, are provable, and its already a crime. If someone beats someone very seriously, its a crime, and if rape also happening, thats is part of this crime. However, the anti-male state sustaining a dedicated rape-crime to oppress the men. By making rape a specialized snowflake crime, these imaginary rape laws are being one of the most spectaular element in the list if the sexual oppression of the male gender. The potential punishment for these imaginary crimes are ramped up, sometimes the sentence is more than in the case of a murder. The real goal of these laws is to oppress and limit the male sexuality and giving no rights for self protection for a men. These laws (at least in some states) also covers having sex while the women is drunk, making nearly every sexual act as a rape.
Our current society currently views the male sexuality inferior, and view men as sexmonsters. If this is true, well then men should not be punished for rape, as its their code by existence. If this is not true, then men should not be punished for rape, because rape does not exists.
But it makes long lasting psychological damage
Psychological damage canot be measured, like breaking someone ribs and bones, which are already a crime. Laws canot be created based on how someone feels. Psychological damage is not a thing, if someone gets psychological damage after a minor crime (that does not creates long lasting damage to they body, such as rape) is just basically having a weak psyche to begin with.
What rape really is?
Rape does not have to do anything with protecting the society, its a form to oppress male sexuality as a whole. Rape is not a crime, as it does not causes harm of the body. Psychological damage canot be measured and someones psychological instability canot be used to justify sustaining imaginary crimes. If someone brutally beats someone, that can - and should be - punished by the laws.
A society which oppressing a group, will not stay democratic
Of course, as the modern society enslaved its men, it was not able to sustain its freedom. If a society oppresses someone, eventually has to opress everyone. Western democracy was replaced by socialist liberal dictatorships. In such a state, gender got detached from the biological sexuality, and it became question of choice. Due to the desintegration of the structure of family system, the childbirth rates are far below reproductive levels. This enforced western societies to encourage migration from foreginer ethnicities and cultures, wiping out the original ethnicities living in these oppressive feministic nations.
Illustration: child birth rates in europe
The tax rates and bureocracy are continously rising, its becoming nearly impossible to sustain a corporation under the market rules. As industrial throughtput decreases, people are forced to work more, and they are able to afford less items to buy. Due to the fall of the industrial throughtput, there is also a drastical drop in the number of engineers and workmans. The place of the scientifical life is filled with fake-science, such as liberal arts and gender studies, which catalizes the demise of the economy.
God annihilating cultures with rape hysteria
To understand how rape is actually a form of an anti-male oppression, we can observe the stories in the bible closely. In the Genesis, we can learn what the ancient egyptian society was like. Egypt slowly turned into a socialist welfarestate, where people living from the aid of the state. Egypt had no conception of capitalism, or accumulation of wealth. A famine later on finalized the socialist structure of the society, and every house and land became the property of the state. Those who were exception, were sent to forced labour to work for the society. These forced labourers sustained the society, basically paying 100% tax after they labour. In the book Genesis (39) we can read the story about how women terrorized men with imaginary rape laws. The prophet of god, Joseph, was sentenced to prison after he refused to have sex with a leader, and as a revenge, she accused him for raping her. As we can see, Egypt was a socialist-feminist terrorstate as well, similar to our current states in America and Europe, and nowdays, in eastern Asia as well.
Illustration: taxation in north europe in the last few decades.
Later, God summoned his people, to save them from this socialist-feminist terrorstate, and give them a free and capitalistic society, where the leaders was given specific laws and very small taxation by the God, as in the Bible, God doesn not tolerates dictatures, communism, or oppression of men. The rape hysteria is however, not yet ends in the Bible. One of the next scenes, a leader of a city rapes the daughter of one of the Israelites. The israelites kill everyone in the city as a revenge. Later on, God orders them not to allow hysteria: every person who attacks a practicular person as a group, will be annihilated by God. God will protect the person, and eradicates the attackers, does not matters if the attackers was right or not.
A few decades after the israelites settle, a group from the tribe of Benjamites are raping and killing a woman. The housband of this woman getting very angry, summons an army and starts a war against Benjaminites. The war causes big devastation, most of the Benjaminites are killed, and almost every Benjaminite women gets killed, so they have to found new women. After the war, they slowly got invaded by Philistineans. They have realized they was acting against the gods order, thats why they got ravaged by the God. They decide not to have similar civil wars every again.
In book of Eshter, which tooking place after the Persian invasion of Israel, we can observe that an imaginary rape crime by Eshter is used to start war among various ethnicites of Persians. Due to this success, the civil war weakens the Persian rule. Once again, God annihilates a nation with rape hysteria.
The last occasion of a sexuality-related crime is discussed in the Bible is, when a group of people want to stone an allegedly cheating women to death. Jesus does not allows them to do this. After this story, every sexuality-related crime is being non-punishable. Jesus renders sexual misbehaviours unpunishable by the state. Such crimes are still morally blameworthy, but laws does not cover sexual crimes any more. Punishing rape, divorce, cheating, sexual harrasment by the state, is denying Jesus Christ and christianity.
Therefore, states with rape hysteria are denying the Bible, they deny Jesus and Christianity as whole.
The birth rates in these countries are far below the reproduction level (2 children per women), only the foreginer migrants are having larger birth rates. As God promised, once again, eradicating all the nations with a rape hysteria.
Age of consent
As a healthy moral is dismissing the conception of rape, its also an interesting question to investigate, what having sex with a children is. On the world, almost everywhere, age of consent is 14. Some contries having 18 or 17 as the age of consent. Just a century ago, having a 12 year old wife was totally acceptable by the society. And so this was the case for the whole history of the humanity. For example, Mary gave birth to Jesus at age 13. Men are biologically coded to sexually like young girls, even if, according to modern research, the utherus is being fully developed only by the age of 18. Having a high age of consent has more thing to do with oppression of the male sexuality than protecting girls.
But sex with a 10 year old is disgusting!
A 10 year old girl is probably cute, and not disgusting. Maybe you are right, and having sex with a 10 year old is not appropriate, and its disgusting. What is the appropriate then? Well, maybe 14, but what is an appropriate and what is legal, that is a different question to begin with. MAYBE if somebody has a sex with a 10 year old, that is sick! But at the same time, having punishment is not the proper way to deal with somebody who fucks 10 year olds. First of all, because a christian society cant punish sexuality, and men are encoded to love young girls. Anti-male propagandists say nonsensual theories to justify punishment of pedophiles, such as: its a rape, because they ruining the sexual health of the young girl, and her ability to pairbond would be damaged. These kind of theories are however, unmeasurable, and not-existent. Laws punishing pedophilia are illegal, and products of anti-male, anti-christian socialist states.
For example, more than a decade ago in Hungary, the age of consent was 18, however, later they decreased it to 14. Before this, in Hungary, just like everywhere else, there was a lot of sexually motivated rape and murder cases against children, just like everywhere else on the world. Guess, how many of such cases were happened AFTER they decreased the age of consent to 14!
Thats right, there was ZERO cases. (Except one, but the motivation there hasnt anything to do with sex - the criminal was an insane paranoid skizo).
How to deal with pedophiles and sexual predators then?
Very good question! Some muslim and african country ignoring pedophilia and every other kind of sexual crimes. Anti-male hysteria should not be allowed, and as we discussed earlier, it disgusting in the eyes of god as well. However, even if the state is not allowed to punish these acts, some of these are still moral crimes. Historically, muslim states were forced the rapist to live with his victims, to remind him for the consequences of his acts. However, this is not a good approach, as it ignores the victim, and objectifies her. This dilemma is however, multiple tousand year old. There will be no good answeers of this question, and there will be none at all. Oppressing and demonizing men is also not an asweer for this problem.
Some country illegalizes the possession of child porn pictures and videos. However, rendering punishment for possessing these materials are oppression against men, again.
Men leaving the society
MGTOW is a movement that decides to liberate men from the oppression by propagating a new lifestyle. The MGTOW phrase means: Men going their own way. The followers of this philosophy are refusing to settle down and have families. A MGTOW follower refuses to work more than he absolutely needs to, and focuses on his hobbies instead. Some MGTOW followers having sex, but most of them refusing to have sex. They dont settle and dont sustain long term relationships.
MGTOW followers cease connection with women, and they cease connection with society as much as they can. They dont cooperate with state institutes, and they focus on having passive income sources, and they try to quit the job market alltogether, and trying to avoid tax-payments. They dont enter marriage to protect themself from losing all of they belongings. They also dont have children, as they dont want to become forced-labour slaves through paying child-support. MGTOW is a form of passive resistance against the oppression of the male gender. The movement is rising exponentially among young men.
How cryptocurrency can empower men and boys?
Back then, cryptography was barely usable to protect the rights of men. For example, if the child porn was stored on a Linux computer and saved only behind an encrypted TrueCrypt ( https://truecrypt.ch ) partition with a password that is not being entered anywhere else, then the partition is canot unlocked by the authorities. (Windows, Android, IOS, Iphone will send the passwords back to the servers of the authorities).
The situation was however improving as the arrival of cryptocurrency. The article has listed sexual oppression so far, but the cryptocurrency is here to aid men against economical oppression. MGTOW also focuses on the economical oppression as well. Western anti-male states having an invention called child support, some of them having a separate invention called alimony. The society uses men as slaves, in the case of divorce, men are forced to pay child support and sometimes alimony, despite of not even having any reproductive rights for they children. If the men refuses to cooperate in this process, the balances will be closed from his banking account by the feministic state with a bigger fee for collectors as well.
Cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin Cash, Dogecoin, Monacoin, however can not be locked down. Beware, there are state friendly fake-cryptocurrencies, which support locking down the address of an individual. Bitcoin Cash also offers Cashshuffle, a feature that allows more privacy by organizing payment pools, and disconnecting the sender from the recipent of a practicular balance. Once the individual succesfully relocated his wealth to cryptocurrency, its not lockable by the state. Using Truecrypt to create a new encrypted partition, and putting the wallet files behind it, will also give the opportunity to deny the existence of any cryptocurrency wallet on a computer, if the computer is confiscated by the state.
Cryptocurrency takes away the financial hegemony from the state
Cryptocurrency of course can be, and should be used by anyone, not just men. Cryptocurrency can not be taxed. There is a lot of FUD going on in the community, spread by statists. However, if you dont have a signed contract with some exchange, nobody can prove how much cryptocurrency do you own. Even if some techie tracks your transactions, you can always deny the amount you have by simply denying its existence (if you have Truecrypt on your computer).
If they want to tax or take away your crypto balance, they cant do it with a few clicks (unless you are stupid enough to store it on an exchange). To force you to lend out your cryptocurrency, the state probably have to go to your place, confiscate your computer, which probably uses various methods of cryptography, if not else, at least your wallet is locked with a password. Then they have to break your bones one by one to force the password out of you, or so on - or they confiscate your $200 washing machine for your imaginary debit, and they sell it, but either way, the state will have to put in eronomous effort to try taking away your things, and at the end they will just fail in it.
What would you accuse someone of, if they had sex with a handicapped person who fell of their wheelchair and kept screaming that they want them to get off of them? Assume there is no hitting or pinning down, just a natural inability to escape because of being handicapped.
If a huge guy with a knife came up to you when you are walking in a forest and asked you for your money and you said "please don't take my money" and then he asked you again in an aggressive manner, would you call that a robbery or a voluntary donation?
Physical damage is not a prerequisite for aggression, using someone's body or property against their will, and denying them their self-ownership or private property, or even threatening to deny them any of these, is aggression.
What if I give you viagra without you knowing about it to make you horny? I am altering the state of your mind through means that you cannot, or I do not allow you to, avoid. Whether you are able to disassociate from others is a great test to figure out whether they are aggressing against you. Is it ok to tell someone in public something to make them horny? Probably yes, because they can leave, but if you keep chasing after them so that they HAVE to keep hearing you, you are abusing their sensory inputs. Can I offer you a drug that would make you horny? Sure, because I can chose not to take it. But if you slip it in my food, you deny me the choice, making that aggression, regardless of whether there was physical damage or not.
You can also kidnap someone without causing them any physical damage.
Also, rape can cause physical damage, I don't know where you got that it doesn't. You could get someone pregnant, you could give them an STD, you could make them bleed. Do these things happen during consensual sex as well? Sure. Also broken noses happen during consensual boxing matches, that doesn't mean that I break your nose without your consent.
The threat of physical damage (or the threat of aggression in general) is aggression itself as well. If I threaten to kill you if you don't give me money, and you give me money, that's not a donation, it's robbery. If I threaten to kill you if you don't have sex with me, that's not normal sex, that's rape.
So if I had a video of me using cushions to pin you down while you are drunk, and then having sex with you while you scream, that would prove nothing about the consensuality of the action right?
Or the victim may be facing more than one perpetrator. Or the perpetrator may have a knife, or a gun. Or he knows martial arts. Or he may threaten you to kill your child if you resist. Or he may be well connected with police and politicians. Or or or... There are waaay too many ways to rape someone without having to beat them senseless.
Do you believe that someone who beats a man (or a woman) senseless on the street, and then leaves, should face the same punishment as one who beats someone senseless and then proceeds to sodomize them? There is no extra crime if they use lube, I guess, right?