Moderator's Rewards : My Suggestion And Review..

41 153
Avatar for Dangerous_Fly
4 years ago

Hello everyone, it's Dangerous_Fly once again . It's a pleasure meeting you all. I just want to add my review on the moderators rewards and I think we all can suggest various means to do so. Thanks @Fexonice1 for the idea.

Firstly let's do to my review of Fexonice1's suggestions. You can read his full article here.

He thought it wise that being a moderator is something that is a bit tedious and also the time spent for moderation can also be used for writing of which I agree with him because some moderators do there work quite well.

  • I agree fairly with him for saying that there should be rules governing the moderator rewards where participants should be made to understand certain rules that is they should understand that they should pay an amount of money.

  • I also agree with him that a percentage of the moderator rewards should go to the funds and also the rewards shouldn't be paid from the Read.Cash fund.

I agree with the above points as it will help in the running of the platform where money is again shared or given to the funds through this process but got disagreement of which includes;

  • Making tipping compulsory : He chooses to make tipping other writers in the community compulsory where if you don't tip , you don't get tipped. Here, it again becomes a work for read.cash to implement a feature where if the person doesn't abide he/she can't also be tipped . That means they will have to review the work of people and look at these things before they can implement this ..

  • Also he made mention of a situation where writers should be allowed to post just one article per day. This doesn't go well with me since I think it will affect the writers . If I am a writer and I post two articles or more per day that means I will have to join more communities and bear same responsibilities while my contents are on the same topic or field.

  • He also made mention of a percentage for moderators and he says tippers can adjust the percentage to give to the moderators and writers , for me that won't be cook either because why should someone who wrote an article share what he/she earns with the moderators of the community and I must say if this happens , the moderators are going to earn more than the content creators no matter the percentage used , because all the percentages for moderators come to one or few moderators while the percentage for the writer goes for all the people that are tipped. So if A is tipped moderator earns, when B is tipped moderator earns me and when C is tipped moderator earns.

There after @Jdine came up with a splendid ✨✨ idea on how this should be done of which you can make this easier . You can read her article here.

She made it clear as to how she wants to add somethings to@Fexonice1 's post where she brought up an idea since his post looked similar like an upvote circle where the money just goes around among the writers while the moderators earn.

Let's look at hers .

I see hers as the perfect solution for the problem where she made mention of a separate sponsorship for the moderators by the people where she says people should sponsor the moderators they think are doing their work well.

Of course this should have been the best option but here it leaves the people with an option to do so. If they want then they do it but do you think that can be the best?? She also made mention of a minimum amount for the sponsorship and here I also think that is good but let's look at the readiness of the people to do that.

If the people will be willing to sponsor the communities , then her suggestion is the best but what if they are not ready? What if they are not willing since it has a minimum?

We can be expecting $0.01 as the minimum here, obviously it will be a bit bigger and how many people will like to do that.

Other communities might get people to do so but others might not and when this happens it will be something else.

People already presume the platform to favour BCH enthusiast and when that happens what will the other moderators feel when they don't earn some even if they work hard?

If the people are willing it is fine but if they are not then I agree with Fexonice's plan that some amount should be imposed on the people but in a different way .

Here is then my suggestion if the people are not willing to sponsor .

We impose an amount of money on the participants and it shouldn't be that much say $0.10 -$0.25 but monthly here it works almost like the sponsorship but everyone is paying so we can all it "a tax" .

They can also submit a lot more but reasonably. If you are being paid then you will have to work more so here the moderator will be tasked to look through all and there shouldn't be a minimum for that

I know some people will use that to spam the group because he /she pays so will then trouble the moderator with useless contents thereby the moderator has the mute option where he /she can make good use of it.

Also what if they moderator doesn't work well??

  • Here there should be an option for the people where they can report that and add why they think so , here they can post a link to their complaints that can make it easier to look at it by Read.Cash. Complains that your article wasn't accepted shouldn't be considered but ones that complains about waywardness on the part of moderators. Here the moderator(s) can be penalized for a month or more without payments if the complains become too much because sometimes a mistake can happen for one to approve since it takes just a click to do so. I haven't thought of an effective way to prevent them from receiving the funds though but I think a situation where the tax is paid to an account of Read.Cash then distributed at the end of each month accordingly can help.

  • Communities can also get more hands (qualified) to help if needed and they need qualified ones because if one makes too much mistakes the whole set of moderators suffers the penalization.

Here I think depending on the size of your community as well as the number of submissions to moderate you are paid your worth.

Thank you all for your time and I think @Read.Cash should look into this also if he can.

Thank you once again, it's Dangerous_Fly on this, Bring It On!!!

59
$ 1.81
$ 1.81 from @TheRandomRewarder
Avatar for Dangerous_Fly
4 years ago

Comments

we can add taxes on rich people xD like a socialist

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Nice point! That's what sponsorship is supposed to be. For those who can pay and would like their logo be advertised, right? hehehe

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Socialist do not add taxes on the rich but on everyone and the poor pay the biggest %.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

yeah ,I know but I meant rich people pay more

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Unfortunately they do not. They percentage paid is smaller and their generous gifts and sponsorship is only done because this means they can pay fewer tax!

$ 0.00
4 years ago

That's an innovative idea but

We impose an amount of money on the participants and it shouldn't be that much say $0.10 -$0.25 but monthly here it works almost like the sponsorship but everyone is paying so we can all it "a tax" .

This may effect newcomers' involvement into the communities. In my opinion, any kind of tax might be perceived as a burden by the users. This payment can be done through the ongoing funding pool of Read Cash.

Very nice post dear. Thank you 😌

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Putting this as a burden on the pool won't justify the work but while people pay for it, they will also see to it that the work of the moderator is done correctly. Let's add to the fund but not deduct from it. Newcomers can be given a space of say a week or two and I know they can make it

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Agreed. As long as a "privilege" is given for the new comers, the idea and the rationale behind is fine. Otherwise, the newcomers would be lost in platform 😶

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yeah. you are right about that my idol. ❤️ I really agree with you.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Nice comment 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻. You also made my mind clear about this article 😊

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I like your reasoning, Dangerous_Fly. I also think that writers should not be limited to one post per day. As long as the writer has something valuable to share, he/she should post that. Let the community decide to vote or downvote the post.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Ok.It's a good post about moderator of a community. I think newcomers will be affected,,

$ 0.00
4 years ago

At first moderators, were paid. As the random rewarded started moderators were no longer paid because they did NOT do their job well! The communities were started and the plan was one language, one topic! The option to pick a topic was removed. The next step was fighting scam and plagiarism. Moderators proved they didn't fight it and didn't care. They just cared about approving as many requests as they could. Plagiarism included. No reading, no commenting. They went for making money, not for a community with quality.

I say here the same as I said before. Moderators choose to start a community. It was out of own free will. Most do not read and comment at all. I know because I read and comment and I rarely see a comment given by a moderator and if so they are greedy if it comes to words and thumbs up. Most I moderators here have plenty of time. They are bored, jobless and present at more than 3 platforms. It's hard to believe it's about a lack of time to write. A writer writes, no matter what or when. If you have no time to moderate why not leave the community and write? Why not only add your content to your community?

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Are you really sure all moderators didn't do their work well? I remember @Read.Cash explained that reviewing the work of the moderators wasn't effective that was why it was stopped. I stand to be corrected .

Since they went after money and not quality what about a situation where they are paid for their work but penalized for approving a non-related content??

Commenting on an article I must say is because some of the moderators preview the article of which has no comment option in preview mode , therefore I can say that can also be a reason and I don't also think it is compulsory to comment on all articles submitted but all you have to do is moderate genuinely..

If you have no time to moderate why don't you leave moderating and write??

No one says he has no time to moderate or something but what we are saying is that at least a token of appreciation should be given to the moderators of which will go and add up to the fund thereby substaining the platform as a whole

$ 0.00
4 years ago

About 3 weeks after I joined this platform made change after change because there was always a group of "smart guys" going for the money and not caring for the rest, the platform. It was the same with the authors, comments, buying followers, upvote circles, several accounts and upvoting yourself, etc.

Each time @read.cash had to figure something out, make a new rule to fight it. To fight people stealing from the fund! If it comes to it it doesn't matter if there is a good moderator, good author, honest upvoter, that rotten apple in the basket spoils it for everyone.

I am a good writer, moderator but thanks to the rotten apple my reputation here is no longer what it was. Just because some love to invest hours a day and night to scam for a few cents. Cents you can save if you switch off your computer for some hours a day.

If you care about this platform you would not even start this discussion and talk about money. You would be happy to build a reputation, be noticed and receive upvotes from your circle of followers.

How about us all investing for a change instead about the never ending messages about points and money? Caring about the fund together?

Why not writing something really valuable for this platform and the outside world? Again, it's your own free choice to moderate. People can choose you but dump you too. You have nothing special to offer what they can not make themselves. We all can start our own community about the topic we love to write about. It's an illusion to think only one community is the best.

A moderator can always comment. I can so can you. You need to click on the article and read it. If you do not see the comment option you didn't open the article and read it.

For sure there are who say they have no time to write themselves. You even refer to those authors!

What more token of appreciation you want as your name underneath each article you read and commented? This is advertisement for you! People see you show up everywhere and with some luck they take you for serious visit, follow and read you too. If you cannot understand that, it's wise you and the others stop moderating. You do not care about the author or what is written but about your "token of appreciation". A token given in dollars/Bch because being appreciated is not enough for you.

This all you say/wrote really leaves me with what we call " a dirty taste in the mouth behind".

In short: I am disappointed in my collegue moderators, their greed and lack of interest in what is written and this platform. 😕

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I admit people are greedy and ado all sorts of things for their gain thereby spoiling the stand of people . But that doesn't mean we Shouldn't be go in favour of thise who diligently work for that. For me personally as an author earns for my work and being a moderator won't add more to it but what about the others .

Saying I don't care about the platform's must be a mistake on your part because if you read the article well it states that the amount given to the moderator should be shared with the platforms funds thereby adding more to it .

And also saying that I just talk about money is a big might on your part that you have to correct it and look at my points well , look at the article well before you get back. I know where this is coming from though.

Saying if I don't comment than that doesn't mean I am not moderating must be a mistake. Commenting doesn't mean you are moderating and also that is why there is a reason option when you decide to reject someone's post and is it always you have to comment? Sometimes you leave a like if you want to and leave it.

I think it is these mistakes you are making that is why you are telling me that . You can say it for others but not me. Because I set my priorities right and afterall it is a review I made from someone's articles and I don't know why you don't go in for the person but me. Those people who are after money here are there not me. So get your facts right.

Infact moderation should be done from ones pleasure for the community and in deed you can quit moderation and write if you think you don't get anything from that but it was a suggestion so if you think you don't agree with it it is your view and that was my view but if you are classifying dont add me to those people.

In short: You got your points but it doesn't work for me so know those people It works for and classify them there and also the article was a suggestion..😏

$ 0.00
4 years ago

You have a very good point... Just as I've said being a moderator you should love your respnsibilities. :) Very well said @wakeupkitty

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I think it's free choice plus you have the luxury to read what you like most on an easy way. It's all lined up waiting for me. If you do not like to read, it brings you nothing, stop moderating.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Thank you for commending my suggestion. It really warms my heart to know people actually liked parts of it.

If the people will be willing to sponsor the communities , then her suggestion is the best but what if they are not ready? What if they are not willing since it has a minimum?

you are right about the minimum. I was also thinking of $0.01 just like in sponsorship for authors. I don't think willingness will be a problem cause it's just like sponsoring an author. I actually haven't thought much about what if the community has more than one moderator and the first thing that came up my mind is paying depending on how many moderators the community has. It's like sponsoring multiple people. It's different than sponsoring an author alone cause in a community, more people will be able to see their logos.. It's like instead of paying an ambassador alone, your paying a TV network kind of thing. (just an example)... And I thought people would love to have their freedom with regards to tipping. If Community A was sponsored and Community B wasn't, Community B should not look at it as discouraging. Look at it as a challenge to improve his community. Saying something like "what will people (other moderators I assume) feel if they don't earn even when they work hard" is like saying what will an author feel is she has no sponsor even when she works hard. Not all people here that are working hard has sponsors and we should assume same thing goes to community sponsorship if it gets implemented. Of course they will feel bad about themselves but they need think more than that. They need to encourage themselves more to write to attract sponsorship, same goes to community moderators. The amount won't be public though same as with the sponsorship in authors. And regarding the platform in favour for BCH enthusiast, I don't think that's gonna be a big deal as authors who are not too BCh enthusiast still gets sponsorships. Not all sponsors are BCH enthusiasts too. And users need not compare the amount they are earning to others, that's why amount in sponsorship is private. You earn (sponsorship) with what people think you deserve and not what you think you deserve. :) I'm sure people who tips BCH enthusiasts have their own reasons why they tip more on that same interests. :)

But nevertheless, I still feel grateful for you to commend my suggestion. And I like the suggestion you have regarding "what if the moderator doesn't work well", I'm not sure about the "tax" though :)

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes but do you think a whole community is worth $0.01 as a sponsors contribution ? Even though it won't be public but there should be a sense of higher contribution and when this happens the community might get a sponsor or not and I like how you related it to an author who works harder but still has no sponsors thereby saying there should be a sense of hardwork but let's take that into consideration because a small contribution of $0.01 for a month as sponsorship for a community is not that favourable.
So I suggest the whole community sponsor the community in a way if paying little amounts I term tax it can be any little amount and based in that it will help better

$ 0.00
4 years ago

a single moderator community with minimum of $0.01 is like sponsoring an author. just that the logo will appear on the community. But it has same sense cause it will be for the moderator. not the community. the advertisement will just be in the community but the sponsorship is for the moderator.

But your suggestion is also good. I'm just not sure as well if people will like the "tax" concept... :) Let's just hope for the best haha

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Why do people sponsor? It is just because they want their logo to appear on your wall so let's look at this, who will like to sponsor someone with $0.01 while he/she can use it to sponsor a community and let his or her logo appear there? No one therefore the resource will go to the moderators only but a situation where we continue to work like how we work but pay off something small to moderators can be good

$ 0.00
4 years ago

That's true but if you think business wise, the more you advertise, the better hehe :) People also have different reasons for their sponsorship.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes so I would rather use that amount to sponsor more communities not users, therefore to break this a higher amount should be required of which people will then say let it go but if a tax or contribution is taken it will be used to sponsor the community but here everyone is included in payment and also in a way they give back an amount to read.cash in order for us to maintain the platform ..

$ 0.00
4 years ago

That's one sponsor talking.. I meant that in a good way. But mind that, as I've said, sponsors have different perspective in sponsoring and I think there are enough sponsors for all community and authors. I also think some sponsors would love to support authors that they believe in separately. I respect your suggestion. :) I'm sure readcash will come up with something that will be fair and people will love, may or may not it be based on our suggestions.. :)

Or they can leave it as that, so there will be no more reasonings hahaha.. It's not like we are unappreciated if they didn't tip us, right? hehe

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes that can be left like that after all it was just a suggestion we all gave it a try and it will be the decision of read.cash to decide or leave it . Thank you

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Exactly. We just suggested things based on how me think is the best way to give appreciations to moderator. :)

$ 0.00
4 years ago

But I don't even know why some people are blaming me as if I am telling them they should do it compulsorily by force or they don't understand what is going on

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Maybe they took it differently... Don't mind them.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Keep sharing

$ 0.00
4 years ago

If it doesn't suit for you, I'm sorry I might have the right word for it. Just leave this platform, there are many other platforms to get the results you are looking for.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

What are you talking about and what doesn't suit who?? Just give an explanation to your words .

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Regarding your views, it's free. But it cannot force it to judge something meaning it must be changed. I see your manners and patterns are uncivilized. You say in the name of the community, or you?

$ 0.00
4 years ago

It is a suggestion I made not a conclusion . Everyone has the right to express his / her thought so please don't use insults on me . I am begging you. Thank you for understanding me. Also I made mention that @jdine 's article is the best solution but what if , it is am if statement so look at it well..

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes, I understand. But it does not always have to provide a view that always often blames unilaterally let alone platforms. Instead, it should provide input for the community to be better.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Ok and also look at where the topic started and know my suggestion , I just gave a suggestion so if you are not cool with it we leave it . Afterall in a decision there will be differences.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

keep sharing

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Well writing

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Amazing thought

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Very informative one! 🙂

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Thank you so much sir for sharing this article with us.

$ 0.00
4 years ago