@Jtoomim

(comment) It would be interesting to see block validation times too. There have been some big changes in block validation (specifically in removeForBlock(...) in v23.0 and more in the to-be-released v23.1,...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Yes, roundabout that. In the previous article, the OP generated 255.9 MB blocks with around 1.3 million tx in them, which suggests an average transaction size of around 190-200 bytes from txunami wi...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Thanks, Justin Holmes! I think it's awesome that I have absolutely no idea who that is.

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Scalenet is a BCH testnet with (currently) a 256 MB blocksize limit. It's intended as a place where people can test the performance limits of their software or hardware without needing to worry abou...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Scalenet is a BCH testnet intended for stress-testing BCH software in high-throughput conditions.

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Some link suggestions: explaining his findings in a video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd6GFpZjLxU a very wide reach https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/fanc6o/the_bch_difficul...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) You should add these links to the article for finding issues or MRs labeled as "bounty": https://gitlab.com/bitcoin-cash-node/bitcoin-cash-node/-/issues?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=opened&labe...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) To add replay protection. I am in favor of both sides adding replay protection. The game theory only works if both sides do it, though. Otherwise, it just devolves into a finger-pointing m...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The opponents believe that the IFP will lead to the centralization of the BCH ecosystem which deviates from the nature of a decentralized cryptocurrency. No, this is not the reason why people...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Therefore, they firmly oppose the upgrade plan of ABC. BCHN has been developed and released BCHN 22.0 node version without the IFP. BCHN 22.0 was being developed long before ABC announced thei...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) In this case, accepting the reality of the imminent fork and realizing the first ever rational and harmonious fork in cryptocurrency history is the most sensible way forward. What makes you th...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) ABC’s IFP exploration is beneficial. I do not believe this. Bitcoin ABC is so desperate for money that they are willing to split BCH because it will get them more money than they are curre...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The inefficiency of public governance is a key issue that has restricted the development of BCH for a long time. The IFP is a method of gaining funding, not a method of resolving governance is...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The first step to resolve the governance problem is to have a public governance fund. No, that should be the last step, not the first. We should not give Amaury $8 million/year, and then tel...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The biggest risk of the IFP is causing the centralization of the BCH ecosystem. No, the biggest risk of the IFP is that it will cause users, investors, and developers to perceive BCH as a corr...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The hash rate remains neutral. The IFP code is inherently a 51% attack. That's just what the code does. Miners who run the ABC software will reject any block that does not pay ABC 8% of th...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Price? Edit: I will not be paying anybody else to translate this article.

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Who are the current signatories in the 3-of-5 multisig wallet?

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Yeah, I've been getting that criticism a lot lately. I heard similar comments on https://read.cash/@jtoomim/bch-fork-proposal-use-asert-as-the-new-daa-1d875696 . Maybe think of it as mental exerc...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) There is still no team offering to do the work ABC has been doing You copy-pasted that comment verbatim twice on reddit, too. https://old.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/i32k7m/dark_secrets_of_t...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) but there is no real alternative willing to openly step up and commit to doing it better BCHN, BU, and BCHD are all stepping up and committed to doing better. Two of those three teams have bee...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) it should be much less example 30sec-1min. I would love to get to very short block times while still maintaining decentralization. It's going to take a lot of work, though. I believe the first...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) The timing was less than ideal. I wanted to get it out earlier, but ... the article just kept demanding more from me as I wrote it. Here's some more context on the timing: https://old.reddit.com/...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) My replies are on reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/i32k7m/dark_secrets_of_the_grasberg_daa/g0aevei/

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Your mom, on the other hand, was excellent in "Steamy Nights VII: The Sensual Sauna."

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) For reference, the concrete proposal that apparently never reached ABC was published three weeks ago: https://read.cash/@jtoomim/bch-fork-proposal-use-asert-as-the-new-daa-1d875696 and the cod...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) It's 75 seconds, not 37. Check lines 123-127 of the diff.

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) It's 5.5 years of worse emission, actually. The BTC drift was about 560 seconds per block, whereas Grasberg will be 675 seconds per block.

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) We were still adding unit tests and other minor improvements at a rapid pace on the other repository. It didn't seem like fun trying to keep two repositories manually synced up all the time between...

@jtoomim 3 years ago

(comment) Correcting for historical drift means that in the future, we will be drifting by the same amount in the opposite direction until the two drifts cancel out. For every second we gained in the past, we...

@jtoomim 3 years ago