@shadow-kwh activity
3 years ago: gave $0.29 tip to
"Dodging Bullets."
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
This is rather ironic indeed
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
I agree, that's still overall bad PR, to no fault of read.cash at all though.
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
They assume that it's a form of signaling for social worth.
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Unfortunately people has accused us of cheating because of that tip and this weakens our message.
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
After discussing with another user in comment, we would like to highligth BTC.TOP reply in their AMA about the funding plan to show how badly constituted is this plan. This AMA appears to us very low...
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Again, they are not a miner, they are a pool. They are not invested in BCH or mining (not to the extent of their pool size anyway). Assuming they have the network best interest is a stretch, and total...
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
The issue is that Nakamoto Consensus will not prevail. Even if the miners that disagree would win the amount of hashrate, the full node will never follow that chain.
Prominent BCH developers have sai...
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Yes, 1.2M$ (at current valuation) is PLENTY for our scale to ensure competing team can be well funded. What is great is that the funding scale with the valuation of the coin, helping it to sustain whe...
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Yes we have remarked this too. There was 5 snapshots yesterday when we wrote this article together and today they have been wiped from wayback machine.
His quote are still there as originally written...
4 years ago: published the article
BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining Group (SEE UPDATE INSIDE)
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Actually we are suggesting a long-term funding plan to developers instead of a 6 month stint that is going nowhere. 1% of income represents 1.2M$ per year (after halving, at current valuation). This i...
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
We really hope that we will not be forced to go there.
If it has to happen, we will absolutely activate the other rules for this hard fork.
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Thank you for posting this on reddit.
4 years ago: commented on the article "BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining G..."
Yes, we agree a strong funding for BCH development is a must. However funding also means to go beyond the protocol only, there are lots of open-source software around a cryptocurrency that are not ful...
4 years ago: published the article
BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining Group (SEE UPDATE INSIDE)
4 years ago: published the article
BCH Dev Fund: A Response from an Opposing Mining Group (SEE UPDATE INSIDE)