My initial impressions of ASERT vs Grasberg

Make transactions take longer to confirm than existing DAA, on average

While this is certainly true for block confirmation time, this may be different for transaction confirmation time because more transactions are issued in longer block intervals. Jonathan Toomim has shown these to differ substantially in case of oscillating block times, with the current DAA having a 1257 seconds average transaction confirmation time, which ASERT reduces to 638 seconds. Grasberg will likely score somewhere in between, but exactly where is hard to tell due to the absence of Grasberg simulations.

Attempts to compensate for earlier drift in emission

It should be emphasised that the EDA-era drift will be fully compensated (i.e. BTC block height overtakes BCH block height again) soon enough with both the current DAA and with ASERT, simply because we now have an average block time of 10 minutes whereas Satoshi's original DAA has a smaller average block time.

So this difference is really only about the BTC DAA drift.

I do not know which of the two is better.
What I do know is that if the BCHN and ABC developers don't come to an agreement and there is another split, it will be a huge setback for Bitcoin Cash and in the worst case it will be its end.

[Removed comment]

Awesome review! We needed this. It's too bad the "Grasberg" DAA was just sort of sprung on us without any conversation.

I love this article. Its very helpful for us Keep going Be unique

Thanks for this great technical review. However it seems like that ABC is not willing to participate in any kind of discussion. The silence after throwing a bomb from ABC is turning into a recurring trend and it's very unprofessional and unhealthy for people who are supposed to be trusted as protocol developers.

its lovely artical.

Good update

Wow lovelyu

Keep sharing

which one do you prefer?

Good job

Good

good

nice

I will be awaiting the results and the discussions before the approval of any algorithm.

Keep sharing

GREAT 💯💯💯

good

Wow .so nice .. it's really helpful for us..I learn here something .

Trying to understand this

Nice article btw where did you collect this information ?

How do you get up to $21 am a new user be nice

Keep sharing

Even though this type of discussion is very deep, I can understand that there's some comparison to the both of the parties who proposed their proposal, with that it is crucial to every one of us and all we can do now is have each other's back. At times like these we should all be more understanding and disagreement should be avoided. Because if not, it can lead to a huge chaos in the community or worse a split. And we don't want this to happen since many of us believe in BCH. I think we just hope for better outcome.

Nice