There is No Justice for Loser

The history of the Law comes from chaos. Humans forming colonies destroy the lives of other peoples. The first war had the goal of choosing a leader.

The most logical rule when humans need community is that the strongest member is chosen to be the leader or chief of the tribe.

After that, one tribe attacks or invites another tribe to war. War after war happens just to prove who is the strongest.

After the war is over, the strongest tribe that wins will use all words as a law that must be obeyed by the tribe that loses the war.

The victor in war can do anything and everything said and done is law. That is the truth of the law.

The victors of the war are free to rape women, torture the losers of the war, take property and destroy the dwellings of weak tribes.

In fact, until the time of the first and second world wars, the law was the product of the colonizers or the victors of the war.

The losing country must accept that every woman is raped, every land belongs to the colonizer, and all the wealth of the earth belongs to the colonizer.

Every defeated native must accept all the laws said by the invaders. There is no justice for those who lost the war.

For the case in Indonesia, after the Dutch colonized Indonesia for more than 300 years. Then, Japan colonized Indonesia for 3.5 years.

Its Like other countries that declared independence and at the time other countries recognized our independence.

At that time, the founders of the nation discussed the constitution and the laws that must be implemented.

Until now, Indonesia still uses laws from the Netherlands such as the Criminal Code and the Civil Code. All the laws governing criminal and civil law originate in the Netherlands.

After the Constitutional Court annulled several articles in the law because they were not in accordance with the Indonesian constitution. Still, legal politics is still difficult to revise the Criminal and Civil Code.

The Weird Law

The current reality, the law is indeed strange. You know that Indonesia is not very free, I mean the people here. No one is truly free to express opinions in public or in the media. Everything has limits that must be accepted by society.

In fact, the Constitutional Court has annulled the legal provisions regarding insults to other people. This article is a very strong article to make activists or anyone else feel the bitterness of life in prison.

However, the political elite always has the sense to govern society. They formed a law that regulates the dissemination of information and electronic transactions.

Articles about insults that have been buried by the Constitutional Court, are now revived through a new law.

You know, anyone who insults the president and public officials. All will be arrested and receive sentences to imprisonment. However, this law is used to silence activists and the poor.

There are several cases where rich children who go viral on social media are not punished even though the rich children insult the president, state institutions or anyone else.

You know, it's really weird here

If you criticize the handling of civid-19, then you will be considered to be telling lies and you will be jailed!

If you criticize the policies of private hospitals, then you will face trial and you will be imprisoned!

If you support the opposition, then you will be dismissed from your job!

If you curry favor with the ruler, then you will receive a title for a position that is enough to make you live with a lot of money!

The law belongs to the ruler. Those who oppose the rulers of this country will feel life in prison. Situations like this are like life where war after war takes place to determine which laws apply.

Korupto Says: Don't Be Shame on Corruption

Can you provide information on how the courts in your country punish criminals?

You know, the theft case is like a no-nonsense joke. How is it possible for someone who steals to buy food to receive a heavier punishment than someone who steals state money?

The petty thief is more tormented than the corrupt. This is really weird. Does justice really exist? Is it for the sake of justice that you have to close your beautiful eyes when the poor always lose in a room that always mentions names for justice.

If the officers of the law run the job of catching thieves. The officers would arrest, yell, and occasionally beat.

The law really made the poor people feel more fear than the angel of death coming.

This case is different if law enforcement officers catch the corrupt. All like a beautiful drama.

After the corruptor is free, the corruptor can participate in general elections and become a member of the legislature, senator, or regional head or leader for local government. 

You know, you have nothing to be afraid of when you become a corruptor. This State, corruptors still have political rights and have the potential to win elections or regional head elections.

You can search for that information on google. ehh wrong, now you have to use Presearch to find information.

On this day, it is the Corruption Eradication Commission that once got the love of the public. Now, this corruption eradication institution has lost its dignity as the best law enforcer.

The Corruption Eradication Commission has become a state institution that does not have any honor.

When the Chairperson of this institution receives ethical sanctions. The head of the institution did not resign. Until now, the leader of the institution is still the boss.

Employees working in anti-corruption agencies must quit or be fired. Those who are idealistic and critical of the chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission have only two choices.

First, the employee submits a letter of resignation. Second, the critical employee must leave with unreasonable reasons.

Democracy Is Government

You know, there's something even funnier going on here. At the same time local democracy will be held in 2020.

All political elites say that health protocols can be used so that local leadership policies are not damaged. So, the election of regional heads who lead regional governments must be carried out.

General election organizers are required to carry out regional head elections in 2020.

There is nothing to be afraid of from Covid-19. Simultaneous Local Democracy in 2020 runs according to the agreement of the Government and Legislative Members.

Laws governing regional head elections are issued. Even though there are candidates for regional heads or election organizers who have died due to Covid-19. Nothing can stop local democracy in 2020.

However, the government and members of the legislature say different things for the regional head elections in 2022.

The government and members of the legislature share the same view of rejecting the implementation of local democracy for 2022. They have their reasons because Covid-19 is very dangerous to human health and life.

Didn't you hear wrong? Not.

Local democracy in 2020 is carried out by force. However, Local Democracy in 2022 is not implemented for a strange reason. That's the law. Laws are laws and laws are products of the government and legislative bodies.

The law will be implemented if the government and political parties say it must be done. Laws are not implemented properly if the government and the legislature say there is no need to implement local democracy.

Why corruption never dies? Because the law doesn't work right!

Why do crimes happen? Because there is no justice!

why is there criticizing opposition? Because the winner of the election should not be a dictator!

Why should there be a court? That all criminals be punished and imprisoned!

Why do countries with abundant natural resources remain poor? Because the state money is corrupted!

Why are the seas and forests and mountains destroyed? Because mining companies can buy earth from the government!

Are the questions and answers correct? I don't know what the laws are in your country. You can write about the laws that are there. happy writing.

Lastly, why do governments and politicians and the rich reject cryptocurrencies? Because crypto makes the government has no power to regulate the wealth of the people.