Political parties are one of the pillars of democracy. This knowledge is almost known to many people, especially politicians. Because political parties are places where you struggle to convey the votes of the people you represent. You struggle in trying to change or recommend a public policy. Of course, you are fighting for the interests of your supporters, voters, and the people we represent in your constituency.
Therefore, political parties are very important. In a democratic country the leader of the country is elected through general elections. There the leaders and representatives of the people or senators need support from political parties. No one has yet led the country through political channels through individual candidates.
Money and Political Parties
My friends are all, you know, in the beginning political parties were part of the job. You have to be serious about your job as a politician. You hear a lot of public complaints and influence state leaders to make policies that solve the life problems of citizens. Politicians do not need to find other jobs. So that politicians can focus on political parties.
Every day, politicians hold important meetings. then seek solutions to community problems. In the end, the results of the meeting's decisions were conveyed through representatives of political parties in the legislative building. The aim is to discuss problems and solutions with the government.
Later, cases emerged, there were party members who were new, without any experience in political parties. That person never performs work that is ordered by a decision from a political party. However, with wealth, new members of the party can control political parties. This rich person is able to force the party to issue political policies that benefit that person.
From this problem, the theory of money politics emerged. So, money politics is a political job that pays voters or political parties a sum of money. Therefore, the money gives influence to the owner of the money to get positions in the executive branch or is able to make the rich man occupy positions as assistant to the president.
Before you think about money politics are all activities that use money. I will tell you that money can be used for two things, political costs and money politics. The two are different. Political costs are the costs you spend doing work as a politician.
For example: you have to go to some place. So, you need fees for transportation, accommodation, communication costs and others. That's a reasonable political cost. No problem. However, if you campaign and afterwards give money or promise money to your potential voters, it is called money politics. The difference between the cost of politics and money politics is very thin, you have to look at it with examples and data that you get from the actual events.
Another example, if you register with a political party to become a new member. If there really is a requirement to submit the registration fee. That includes political costs. In addition, if you attend schools, courses, and training from political parties or at other institutions recommended by political parties. It is also an example of a political cost.
It is different from other shirts. If you give money to a political party administrator to get a place as a legislative candidate, give money to get a chance as a candidate for senator, or give money to be supported as a candidate for president and vice president, this is an example of money politics.
The Royal System Eats Political Parties
Do you know that democracy is the opposite of the concept of a kingdom. Thus, the pillars of democracy called political parties may not use the existing system at work. However, today, the royal system has been brought into the homes of political parties.
A person who has been in power in a political party and has the support of capital, money, and economic networks can eat up a political party. Because of that, you can see how a child of a political party leader can become part of the core board in a political party. Or, a president who supports his child to become the next senator, legislative member, or presidential candidate.
Some people must say that being a legislative candidate, senator candidate and presidential candidate are human rights in the field of civil and political rights. True, but it must go through the procedures of political organization. How could the son of a government official get a golden ticket to become a candidate for successor from his father?
Except, the child has attended training in a political party and then does work as a political party administrator. then, the child, the son of the government official, could say that the child deserves the opportunity to become his father's successor in politics. You must be able to distinguish between civil and political rights and dynastic politics. We cannot say that everyone has the right to be elected before we go through the process of learning and serving in the world of politics.
For developing countries, it cannot be said that they are developed or modern countries. The concept of a political dynasty can add to the political image. Because, most cases that occur in small countries are the owner of the money taking over a political party when he is running as a candidate for chairman of a political party.
After he won, the businessman chose his son to take up an important position in a political party. The next case, in the space of a legal democracy, party leaders can determine their families to run as legislative candidates, senators or government officials. It happens. and it is politically wrong.
The Main Reasons Governments Reject Cryptocurrency
At this time, many good people did not have the opportunity to become government officials. The reason is that good politicians do not have funds for political costs (remember: not money politics). Because, so far, politics has been used as a tool to increase money (traditional, paper money or money in the form of coins / metals).
Good politicians also do not have supporters who have the capital to support campaign programs. Thus, everyone becomes pragmatic. This happens a lot in countries where democracy is not strong yet and are still experimenting with the technical model of implementing democracy.
For example in my country, the political costs are very expensive. however, business people can use money for political expenses as well as for money politics.
However, money owners are terrified by the emergence of digital currencies. Cryptocurrency presence is like a very real danger for politicians, government officials, and traditional investors.
The main reason is not that digital currencies cannot be regulated by government policy or political power. Even company owners and business people are unable to justice cryptocurrency. The real problem, they are afraid of crypto asset owners taking over political parties. I'll give you an example that you can quickly understand.
If I am a Bitcoin Cash owner, assume that I have 1,000,000,000,000 BCH worth of assets. Then, I and several critical people with the same number of assets or both have Bitcoin Cash entered the political world. We became members of political parties and graduated to become party cadres. We can use BCH for political expenses such as political education, courses and campaigns.
So, we don't need to borrow money from investors who have been in power in a country. If we win the election, we of course act with strong ideals. We can refuse money from bandits or corruption traps. Why? Because our political costs come from BCH and other types.
An example of this is how the owner of assets from BCH enters politics and cleans the dirty water in the glass by continuously adding clear water to the glass. Until one day, all dirty politics comes out of the glass and people can drink in the clear and healthy water that results from good political struggle.
That is the strongest reason governments and financial officials or economic analysts reject Bitcoin Cash and other types. They are afraid, good people, critical, and have a fighting spirit for the people to expel corrupt practices in political parties that have existed so far.
Waiting for the time
We are waiting for the time, initially many investors will enter the digital money market. That's normal. Because they have the capital and knowledge as well as experience in the world of investing and stocks. However, there are still investors who are building a global community that will safeguard the ideals of good people.
For example, there are writers who always write about good things, including in the world of politics. The writer always gives hope that BCH can support a good political program. On the other hand, activists in all organizations have room to invest in and become supporters of platforms such as read.cash. These activists do not need to wait for financial assistance from donor agencies or anyone else. These activists can speak up and shout to condemn criminals who have been doing damage to the environment, or have committed human rights violations.
If all these good people come together, it's just a matter of time. Countries that have been poor so far, countries that have borrowed from the world, will turn into developed countries that pay off all debts and make the world bank no longer have any income from interest on debt from poor countries.
You can read all about me here
You are so good writer💚