A lawyer wore tradition charms to court

10 25
Avatar for Danika
Written by
1 year ago

Hey friends,

How have you all been? A drama was displayed in a court of law in Nigeria when a lawyer wore his traditional charms and attire to the court. For those of us not aware of what's going on in Nigeria, there is a seemingly friction between the two most recognised religion in the country, Christianity and Islam with the Muslims asking for girls to wear hijab and the Christians wanting to be included in government by making sure the vice president to be chosen in a particular party is a Christian also, they are clamouring for the end to the killings of Christians in the country under the disguise of blasphemy. During the court sitting in regards to the petition by the Islamic group, a lawyer as decided to take the whole matter to a whole new level, let's have the gist I'm full;

Image source

An Islamic human rights organization, the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), says Malcolm Omirhobo, the lawyer who dressed as a ‘juju priest’ to the Supreme Court on Thursday displayed a “behaviour contemptuous of the Supreme Court pronouncement”.

Newsbreak reports that MURIC, through a statement by its director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, also said Omirhobo’s behaviour is “provocative, condescending and irreconcilable with the noble profession of law”.

“Going by his personal record, we are not in any way taken aback by what Omirhobo did yesterday. The lawyer has exhibited pathological hatred for Muslims, their religion and the language of their faith in the past.

“Was it not the same Omirhobo who went to court over the existence of Arabic letters on naira notes? He did not stop there. He challenged the use of Arabic on army logo. He also sued the Nigerian Police for approving hijab for police women in Nigeria.

“Omirhobo has behaved to type. If he has his way, he would have every single Muslim Shugabad out of Nigeria. He hates the sight of Muslims, their Qur’an and the language of that Holy Book, Arabic. His hatred reached boiling point when the highest court in the land approved the use of hijab for female students.

“This pushed him to the extreme behaviour which millions of Nigerians saw him manifesting on television yesterday. Instead of licking his wounds privately and gently after the court gave victory to the Muslims, he took his anger and frustration to the Supreme Court.

“Omirhobo’s hocus-pocus is not only contemptuous of the Supreme Court pronouncement but also provocative, condescending and irreconcilable with the noble profession of law. It is bigotry fanned by the embers of hatred. Instead of bowing to the rule of law, this lawyer sought to make a mockery of the judgement of the highest court in the land. He challenged the rule of law. It was reckless, lawless and unethical.

“MURIC calls the attention of respected unions and authorities in the legal profession like the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), the Body of Benchers, etc to the behaviour of Omirhobo. If this goes unnoticed, it should not go unpunished. If this goes unnoticed and unpunished, then there is no hope left for the hoi polloi and law abiding citizens in the Nigerian judiciary.

“Whereas some miscreants hide under the canopy of Islam to kill, maim and destroy properties, young Muslim students in South Western Nigeria have tolerated insults, abuses, intimidation, coercion and even corporal punishment without raising a single finger, not even once.

“All these because they demanded their Allah-given fundamental human right and their civil liberty to wear hijab as enshrined in Section 38(i) & (ii) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. They patiently exhibited forbearance of the humiliation for more than sixty years.

“Instead of holding demonstrations and disturbing the flow of traffic, instead of towing the path of violence, they elected to follow the path of litigation. The journey in the law courts have lasted about nine years but these children waited patiently until the highest court in the land made its supreme pronouncement.

“Alas who did we find mocking the judgement? Who did we find rebelling against the wisdom of the highest court of the land? A learned, a robed lawyer in voodoo garb! If this is not the height of impunity, then we do not know what else to call it. We will be shocked to our marrows if the relevant authorities do nothing about this. It will be an invitation to lawlessness if Omirhobo is allowed to get away with this.

“We have no doubt, however, that this attempt to ridicule the judgement of the Supreme Court on hijab will fail. What happened to all the gymnastic namby-pamby and articulated razzle-dazzle that followed the approval of hijab by an Oshogbo high court years ago?

“The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) instructed Christian students to wear Sango, Obatala, masquerade, church choir garments, etc to school and they actually did. But MURIC told them at that time that it would not last. We said they would soon get tired of it. Well, did it last? Yet hijab is still being worn by female Muslim students in Osun State today without being challenged. So we know where Omirhobo’s acrobatic razzmatazz is coming from. He has failed already. Divine truth will always overwhelm social truth.

“To Chief Malcolm Omirhobo, MURIC has this to say, ‘Your dramatic abracadabra will fail unless there is another court above the Supreme Court. We will defeat you with our decency and discipline. We will defeat you with exchange of love for your hatred.

“‘Chief Omirhobo, we love you. But the issue remains whether or not you love yourself. If indeed you love yourself, accept the Supreme Court judgement on hijab in good faith. Stop desecrating the much reverred law profession. Those of us who are not learned should not be the ones teaching you to respect the rule of law.

“‘If you so wish, continue to wear your Babalawo lawyer dress to court everyday. Wear it everywhere (to the supermarket, hairdresser’s shop, petrol station, etc) the same way Muslim women have been wearing their own hijab’ and see the reaction of your personal friends. A word is enough for the wise.’”

So, there you have it. What do you think about this? For me, although I'm not in support of anybody showing any form of hatred or dislike for any religion, not religion however should be made to rule over another. If a religion can be allowed to wear a certain clothing, shouldn't the others be allowed to wear theirs?

Thank for reading this article. Don't forget to tell me your opinion in the comment section.

5
$ 0.46
$ 0.42 from @TheRandomRewarder
$ 0.02 from @Kushyzee
$ 0.02 from @Aimure
Sponsors of Danika
empty
empty
empty
Avatar for Danika
Written by
1 year ago

Comments

Are you looking for the best Divorce Lawyers near me? If yes, then you are at the right place. Furthermore, finding the right divorce attorney can be challenging, but you can narrow down your options with some research. However, finding the right divorce https://legalfav.com/2023/04/how-to-find-divorce-attorney-near-me/ can make the process easier and less stressful. Also, you need to create the criteria for hiring one of the best divorce lawyers near me

$ 0.00
11 months ago

Guy! 😂this thing is funny. But Nigeria is truly a zoo, we have two laws governing us: civil law and Sharia law. Why will MURIC clamour for hijabs to be worn on official uniforms but draw the line when a traditional worshipper who is a lawyer decides to dress in their traditional regalia? Is that no hypocrisy?

$ 0.00
1 year ago

That's the point. Injustice and plain inequality in our justice system

$ 0.00
1 year ago

It was a nice article, but did you write all this or copy and paste because most of the work seems to be copied from another site and pasted here, if that's how it is, you should be careful for you might get spammed, beside, the person who wrote the explanation is a religion extremist person from what he says I'm sure no church leader would ask their followers to wear things mentioned in the article just because hijab was allowed.

$ 0.01
1 year ago

You are correct, I actually saw the post online and decided to paste it here. I think the lawyer was trying to prove a point. But it is well sha. Thanks for stopping by dear friend 🥰

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Dem go just spam you. This is plagiarism and it's not the first time you're doing this, you will end up in Rusty's black book forever if you continue

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Omo! I'm stopping today. So, does this means I will have to type the whole thing myself or how? Or I can't write anything from another site?

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Ah! It looks like you didn't really know o, plagiarism is a serious offence here, in fact it's a serious offence anywhere in this world. If you must copy something from another site, then you have to completely write it in your own words

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Okay thanks bro

$ 0.00
1 year ago

Hmmm. Be guided

$ 0.00
1 year ago