Join 76,467 users and earn money for participation
read.cash is a platform where you could earn money (total earned by users so far: $ 545,791.18).
You could get tips for writing articles and comments, which are paid in Bitcoin Cash (BCH) cryptocurrency,
which can be spent on the Internet or converted to your local money.
I like the idea of seasteading. The idea that you could solve all political problems by not solving them. Simply up-anchor and move. If the community is split, split the community. There needn’t even be any animosity. The whole thing can be an amicable, even mutually beneficial, arrangement.
You see where I’m going with this?
In all honesty, I don’t want BCH to fork. That would be annoying. I use BCH regularly for online purchases. I love it. Having total control of your own money is not possible outside crypto. Sure, you can hoard objects of value, but spending them is challenging. A fork would make either or both coins less widely accepted and greatly diminish their value. At that point, some of us might be inclined to think that the whole thing is more trouble than it’s worth and just jump ship to another coin.
Fork-talk keeps cropping up (and yes, I realise the irony here). Any disagreement, any misunderstanding, any ambiguous response or even any delay in response. FORK INCOMING! No sooner has one issue been laid to rest than another pops-up. I won’t recap the grievances. You already know them. Besides, it will be something new next month.
All of which leads me to a regrettable conclusion. Vin Armani is right.
[Pause for sad refection]
I don’t know if Vin is a wise sage who understands cosmic cycles or he is just in all the right Telegram groups. Maybe he is the infamous ‘controlled opposition’ or maybe he just understands people as well as code. Doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter whether the entire thing is orchestrated by the enemies or P2P cash or just the result of honest yet fundamental disagreements between well intentioned parties. Sure, drama is part and parcel of decentralisation, but it also deters would-be users, devs and entrepreneurs. Forks solve the problem, but at a cost. Eventually, you fork yourself into oblivion.
The solution… a forklet.
Note: I am using the term forklet instead of fork which implies a new or duplicated money supply, or sidechain which requires interoperability. Interoperability would be great, but likely not easy, so I do not want to commit just to be shot down for technical reasons.
Like two beasties occupying the same rung in an ecosystem, two nearly identical coins might find themselves in competition. Competition is in general a good thing, but when the real competition is fiat, it’s a distraction. A straight fork will benefit no-one but exchanges (and maybe Calvin). So let’s not do that. Instead let’s create something that complements BCH, but also liberates us from the problem of dev capture.
So what should we do?
Fork the code, not the chain. Forks damage a coin by halving the network effect and doubling the money supply. Instead, let’s keep the money supply constant. One way to accomplish this is by burning BCH to create coinbase Edit: new coins on the new chain. Miners of that chain would need to reference the main BCH chain too for this to work. Challenging, but doable.
To give community members more control over the fledgling forklet, it needs a new hashing algorithm. Something GPU friendly (remember, in the absence of block reward, mining would be for fees only).
Capitulate to a quantum of dev capture on BCH. Yup, that’s a tough one to swallow. But no point doing all this then continuing to fork-talk about BCH. We will get our genuinely decentralised forklet. We can still use a stable and widely accepted BCH chain to transact with. Have our cake and eat it.
Imagine that the defining characteristic of the BCH community - incessant drama - could be channelled in such a way as to actually grow the ecosystem, not split it.
Power and profit coalesce. This is as true in cryptocurrencies as it is in politics and society. If you are fighting this trend then you are swimming against the tide. In fact when I finally accepted this was when I got interested in seasteading. Decentralisation requires a continual breaking away. A shedding of the old skin. You have to keep moving forward. Keep evolving.
Just don’t salt the earth behind you.
…hmm. Maybe I am sounding too Vin Armani-ish so perhaps it’s time to stop…