I have a theory that Read.Cash still uses a power user and every time that user likes your article, you will gain, instead of points, a tip from random rewarder
Comments
I am also finding some similarity between likes and rewards in some cases, but not always. A bot will work on the rules set by a human as it doesn't have a brain of its own, therefore it is ultimately the human behind the bot, his thinking, which is working. A bot can easily assess the quality of a tangible thing like the hardware of a TV, whether there is any manufacturing defect or not, but assessing the quality of a writing independently is a different game.
Hmm. I do think so, I've seen articles being copied and still gets an upvote from the rewarder. I think it is really random, and it can't checked if an article was plagiarized.
I actually don't think so. I have seen some people not getting enough like and coment still has big tips on that article. So may be the topic and how big it is matters, not the like comment and upvote from any power user
Depend on your article even I don't get more like I can still get a tip