Evaluation and benchmarks on the path to content creation.

My writing journey, which started with Read.cash, is moving to different platforms. This move offers the opportunity to spend time with new people and read their articles.

I am experiencing and every experience offers a comparison opportunity in my mind. Each platform has its own pros and cons. The people who use each platform have their own unique characters that they display there. Each character has their own values that they defend.

It's okay to praise something on the "a" platform. When you criticize, you may face accusations of crimes you did not commit under unexpected reactions and counter-arguments. I exclude areas of macro content creation from this idea.

There are 3 platforms I have used and a few that I have observed. What I have observed, that is, I am content with just watching!

In none of my content, I deliberately defended that what I said was the only truth, but I did not compromise the values I defended. I think I have the right to expect as much respect as I do.

If we look and think from anyone's point of view; Why should we have a spiteful attitude in a virtual environment, when we can have a friendly approach!

As the relationships increase and I learn new things, I can scale using my sensitive balance within the knowledge I have accumulated in my mind and turn them into experiences...

...but it should be known that what I'm talking about only binds me. Everyone has their own filtering methods and evaluation reports. In the light of these, he can draw his own conclusions.

Even though I try not to offend anyone as much as possible, I can attract reactions when I do not take a political approach and do not hesitate to express the values (ideas) I defend.

At such times, I see no harm or wrong in criticizing my ideas and the values I create…but…

It can be quite disturbing to be accused, albeit limited, by making guesses about my personality by people I don't know. In an environment where I only share my thoughts, criticism should also be directed towards my thoughts.

I find users on read.cash more amateur when it comes to content creation. This amateurishness I mean includes me. But I find everyone here more friendly and witty.

The progress in the atmosphere of a sincere conversation may be a little slow, but I believe and see that the foundations are solid.

In some cases, moving away from professionalism and acting with a guiding and educator understanding can turn into a lifeline for some of us. A friendly attitude to be displayed in an approach that is far from arrogance will definitely have a positive effect.

Although we do not know how this effect will contribute to which life, we can only guess.

Having and following rules is a requirement for any environment with multiple users. But no matter how professional you are, in a journey that has just begun; It can be considered normal to experience foreignness and difficulties in adapting to the environment.

The fact that the rules can be stretched in the face of difficulties will contribute to the formation of lasting friendships and the emergence of a sustainable content creation.

Without forgetting that what is shared is an idea and that there is a real person behind that idea, if criticism is to be made by displaying an oppositional stance, it should be kept in mind that it should only be for the idea.

It's better than being offensive to activate the ignore option if we're not in the mood to do so.

I keep walking as I need more knowledge and experience. Whether my walking pace is slow or fast will only determine the distance I travel. Not my personality!

Thank you for reading!

This article was created for the read.cash site and published only on the read.cash platform.

All content belongs to me.

image source: https://pixabay.com/es/illustrations/cerebro-pensar-humano-ocurrencia-20424/