Join 41,884 users and earn money for participation

IFP: Amaury Sechet At Fault

10 14 exc boost
Avatar for Olad
Written by   91
3 months ago

Regarding BCH IFP and in line with the debate on inclusion of IFP in the Bitcoin ABC's version 0.21.0, and with Amaury Sechet's responses to the fielded questions; can we really say he's at fault for the IFP saga?

Watch the video for some deductions.

4
$ 0.00
Sponsors of Olad
empty
empty
Enjoyed this article?  Earn Bitcoin Cash by sharing it! Explain
...and you will also help the author collect more tips.

Comments

Please subscribe me

$ 0.00
3 months ago

Nice

$ 0.00
3 months ago

OK, I will do that

$ 0.00
3 months ago

It was held up as a demand from miners, which is questionable, and it was presented as a mostly free option, because BTC would pay for it (which is wrong) and that the miners pay for it (which is wrong too), the premise of a fund was not discussed early enough, the money was asked before the job was done, only on amaurys reputation for creating the BCH fork. As it turned out, the exclusion of others and the obvious money grab was really bad. Yes, I think he can be criticised for that. Criticized, not stopped, but the community and the market will now marginalize him. For himself, it was not a good call. He was too shortsighted.

$ 0.00
3 months ago

Thankyou for sharing

$ 0.00
3 months ago

You are highly welcome. Thanks.

$ 0.00
3 months ago

Why didn't you provide the link to the video for easy access

$ 0.00
3 months ago

Thanks. I will do that.

$ 0.00
3 months ago