When you hear someone say "that is normal" or "that is not normal", what do you feel then? Do you get a sense that what is normal is good and what is not normal is bad?
Let us take one example from medicine: It is a common misconception that blood pressure rising slightly by age is acceptable. This is wrong. In fact it is a sign of disease and should be seen as a warning sign. But the medical establishment is not interested in that.
When your physician is checking your blood pressure, maybe he says: "It is normal"; or even worse: "It is normal for your age" - and by that the matter is ignored as unworthy of further attention. But what is he really saying? That your blood pressure is as good as it can possibly be, that it is optimal for human health? No, that is definitely not what he says. He does not even say that it is good.
The word "normal" gives most people a sense of inner comfort, as if being normal would be the ultimate achievement, an optimal state of life, a goal for the whole existence. But beware! Here lies a trap! A confusion of two different concepts: quantity and quality.
In contemporary society, quantity has won precedence and domination over quality to an extent that most people believe that quantity is quality. The consequences of that in politics, science and culture are obvious, but beyond the scope of our discussion this time.
Normalcy is a concept of statistics; nothing more, nothing less. A bit simplified it can be said to mean "what is close to the average". To say that your blood pressure is normal, is a statement of quantity, not one of quality. It only says that your pressure is close to the statistical average (of your age). It says nothing about whether it is in accordance with good health or optimal health. Given that the health of the average individual is far below its optimum, this is not reassuring.
So: beware of being normal, it can be worse than you think!
The words "extreme" and "extremism" are statistical concepts of neutral value - in the same way as "normalcy". Extreme is that which is far from the normal, far from the mainstream. There is nothing inherently good or bad in being extreme. It does say something about quantity, but nothing about quality.
Remember that what is mainstream today often was extreme in the past - and that which is extreme today can be mainstream tomorrow.
Don't confuse expressions of quantity and expressions of quality.
(This article is based on material previously published in TMA/Meriondho Leo and my e-book “Reality & Mind”)
Copyright ©2005, 2018, 2020 Meleonymica/Mictorrani. All Rights Reserved.
(If you liked this, please consider leaving a tip, either here or via CoinTr.ee)
You find all my writings on Read.Cash, sorted by topic, here.
Truly speaking, normalcy is in between normal and abnormal. Hence, normalcy should be taking as the yardstick for more efforts towards the best.