Beware of Being Normal, it can Be Worse than You Think!

2 507
Avatar for Mictorrani
4 years ago

When you hear someone say "that is normal" or "that is not normal", what do you feel then? Do you get a sense that what is normal is good and what is not normal is bad?

Let us take one example from medicine: It is a common misconception that blood pressure rising slightly by age is acceptable. This is wrong. In fact it is a sign of disease and should be seen as a warning sign. But the medical establishment is not interested in that.

When your physician is checking your blood pressure, maybe he says: "It is normal"; or even worse: "It is normal for your age" - and by that the matter is ignored as unworthy of further attention. But what is he really saying? That your blood pressure is as good as it can possibly be, that it is optimal for human health? No, that is definitely not what he says. He does not even say that it is good.

The word "normal" gives most people a sense of inner comfort, as if being normal would be the ultimate achievement, an optimal state of life, a goal for the whole existence. But beware! Here lies a trap! A confusion of two different concepts: quantity and quality.

In contemporary society, quantity has won precedence and domination over quality to an extent that most people believe that quantity is quality. The consequences of that in politics, science and culture are obvious, but beyond the scope of our discussion this time.

Normalcy is a concept of statistics; nothing more, nothing less. A bit simplified it can be said to mean "what is close to the average". To say that your blood pressure is normal, is a statement of quantity, not one of quality. It only says that your pressure is close to the statistical average (of your age). It says nothing about whether it is in accordance with good health or optimal health. Given that the health of the average individual is far below its optimum, this is not reassuring.

So: beware of being normal, it can be worse than you think!

The words "extreme" and "extremism" are statistical concepts of neutral value - in the same way as "normalcy". Extreme is that which is far from the normal, far from the mainstream. There is nothing inherently good or bad in being extreme. It does say something about quantity, but nothing about quality.

Remember that what is mainstream today often was extreme in the past - and that which is extreme today can be mainstream tomorrow.

Don't confuse expressions of quantity and expressions of quality.

(This article is based on material previously published in TMA/Meriondho Leo and my e-book “Reality & Mind”)

Copyright ©2005, 2018, 2020 Meleonymica/Mictorrani. All Rights Reserved.

(If you liked this, please consider leaving a tip, either here or via CoinTr.ee)

You find all my writings on Read.Cash, sorted by topic, here.

3
$ 0.00
Sponsors of Mictorrani
empty
empty
Avatar for Mictorrani
4 years ago

Comments

Truly speaking, normalcy is in between normal and abnormal. Hence, normalcy should be taking as the yardstick for more efforts towards the best.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

"Abnormal"is just another statistical concept. It's the opposite of "normal". I disagree with you, normalcy is not yardstick for the best, it's a yardstick for the average. "The best" however we should define it, is definitely extreme, far from normalcy. And so is the worst, in the other end of the scale.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

But your article is not supported by statistical facts such as normal curve etc in that regard. It treated the word "normal or normalcy" as literary words. Thank you.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

There’s a Gaussian curve right there in the Levey Jennings Chart indicating +-1sd in the lead image 🤣🤦🏻‍♀️

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Normal depends on the society where you live and what people/governments want me to believe but it's not said I agree with it or live by it.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Good. You set your own norms and try to reach the optimal for your life, which is not necessarily the same as the environment wants you to believe.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I wrote something about uniqueness and I think my article compliments yours, haha.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I did take a look at your article. You mean that being unique in your sense is the same as when I talk about not following the mainstream, choosing to be outside of the "normal" in search for the optimal? Yes, indeed, it might be the same thing expressed in other terms.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Bravo!

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Thanks!

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I never knew the word NORMAL go beyond something being good, but now you've build me from quantity to quality.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

That's the misconception I want to challenge.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Truly speaking, normalcy is in between normal and abnormal. Hence, normalcy should be taking as the yardstick for more efforts towards the best.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

its mainstream in our society we can face this type of word of many different situation and this is the real facts of society

$ 0.00
4 years ago

People are social beings. Over thousands of years certain patterns of behaviour have developed in humans. For example, in primeval times, someone who was expelled from the community was condemned to certain death because he or she could not stand up to nature on his or her own. That is why most people, even today, strive to be regarded as "normal" by others. Nevertheless, every human being is different and the more one deviates from the "norm", the more damaging the pressure to adapt.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes, I agree completely, except that thousands of years would rather be tens of thousands. It probably started as a necessity and established itself in human behaviour. Since then every society in human history have punished deviation from what they perceive as the norm. The punishment varies, however, from death penalty to just ridicule and the whole scale in between them, but it is there. Deviating from the norm requires strength.

Thanks for the donation.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

It such a knowlegeble to read this article. It is mainky based in fact and this is what it is hapening currently

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Why do you “label“ something? Because it would be “normal”. It would be accepted by the current “norm“. That would not be “normal” in the past, nor the future. Labels, why bother.. Change is inevitable. Hmmm is that The Gaussian curve. It is within the +-1sd.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

The problem is that people think it is something good, while, for instance in medicine,this is entirely a statistical concept. And, no doubt, if you want optimal health, you should not be pleased with "normal".

Yeah, the curve shows the normal distribution.

When you ask 'Why do you "label" something?' you enter another complicated question which is entirely different. Reality is not classified or labelled, that is something existing only in our minds. Why? Because our minds are limited in ability, we need labels in order to deal with a reality far too complex for us to grasp otherwise.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

That is why I prefer ketogenic food, vegan food also, natural fitness. It might be extreme but it promotes longevity.

Yes it’s true. But reality does not exist in the mind, as what you have said. Mind is limited on its own paradigm. But yeah I know you understood.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I agree. I have a similar approach. I want to find and reach the optimal, I am not interested in the average.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

it is an interesting article . We often glorify any matter by saying that it is normal,it can be happened.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes, and in the same way "extreme" is often perceived as something negative, or used to denote something negative, while it just means far from the average or far from the mainstream.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Very interesting; there is much to ponder in your article.

There is also the possibility that bey being perceived as NORMAL can one to remain invisible within society.

Of course this can also be negative if a person has a psychotic disorder and wants to prey on others but I believe that it is much more commonly exists in the positive. When a person is actually working for the betterment of themselves and other. By being outwardly normal they draw little or no attention to themselves and can continue to contribute positively in a much more quiet and effectively way.

This level of humility maybe rare in a world of celebrity and fame but actually I am sure that invisible acts of kindness and care are being performed all the time by normal people like you and I.

Thank you for sharing your most stimulating article.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

No doubt many acts are invisible to the environment, both of kindness and of evil.

As for not being normal, it can be in any direction. It can be for better or worse. You can always deviate from the average in two directions.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Hmm what is mainstream today has been extreme in the past. That's a fact!

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Yes, and what's extreme today, can be mainstream in the future.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

I read this slowly for my mind to absorb the point of the article. And yes, being normal does not mean something is good or it's okay. In todays society, there is also this negative impact of being called "not normal". As if it is bad and something to be changed. And this mindset is what we really need to change.

$ 0.00
4 years ago

Here you show again why you are such a good reader. If difficult, you read slowly to absorb the text. Most people just rush over a text like this without taking the time to really think about it and understand. And yes, what you write shows that you have understood.

$ 0.00
4 years ago