Are Leaders Ready to Break the Ransomware Cycle

9 36
Avatar for M.Rosenquist
Written by
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

It is good to see US government leaders realize that ransomware is a growing existential threat to our country, at the hands of our adversaries.

A top US national cybersecurity advisor stated in a recent op-ed, “This is a troubling practice that must end.” The government is looking at ways to disrupt ransomware attacks. One tactic is to get cyber insurance companies to stop reimbursements for ransoms.

Undermining ransomware is possible, but the only path is to outlaw digital extortion payments. This targets the root of the problem by undermining the motivation of the attacker.

For decades, cybersecurity and insurance companies have taken advantage of growing attacks and fears to sell their products, which have not provided a meaningful solution to stop the widespread surge of ransomware. It has become a self-serving profit center to motivate customers to purchase more tools and policies for a problem they are not solving.

Security controls are a costly tactic where the attacker maintains a significant overall advantage because they can quickly adapt, thereby requiring more tools to be purchased by the potential victims who are caught in an endless spending cycle. Insurance does nothing to reduce attacks, as it is a mechanism to transfer risk. In fact, paying the attacker simply motivates them more, thereby precipitating even more attacks!

There are feasible and practical plans that would work. However, security and insurance companies are the first to cast doubt on any plans that may disrupt their revenue streams. Their narratives are foreboding, but when closely examined, the fears of outlawing payments are largely unfounded.

As a nation, we are beginning to see how digital extortion is effectively being used by international adversaries and cybercriminals. The trend will continue, rapidly causing more extensive harm. Traditional measures, like continually adding more security tools, continue to fail in fundamental ways, and we must take a different approach.

It is time for the US government to take a serious step forward to undermine ransomware, without creating an unnecessary financial burden on the potential victims, by outlawing digital extortion payments.

0
$ 0.06
$ 0.06 from Anonymous user(s)
A
Sponsors of M.Rosenquist
empty
empty
empty
Avatar for M.Rosenquist
Written by
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

Comments

This will result in far more damage as whole industries will be ruined when their data is locked. It will result in the average person's life being disrupted heavily.

The government cannot help us, as with everything they try to do, the unintended consequences of their solutions turn out worse than the original problem.

The solution is competent, highly trained and paid IT personnel. Not more useless laws.

$ 0.00
3 weeks ago

To properly outlaw they payment of ransoms, it would take a well-planned roll-out. I am not advocating rushing, but rather a methodical process that will still enable companies and critical infrastructures to protect themselves in the process. After instituted, the attacks will significantly drop for everyone. The current security infrastructure is not slowing the rapid rise of ransomware! We must do something different if we want better results. Otherwise, the only winners are the attackers, insurance companies, and security vendors!

$ 0.00
User's avatar M.Rosenquist
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

So insiders would be exempt and normal people's options would be limited on how they can recover from an attack. Government is not the solution.

$ 0.00
3 weeks ago

Nope. Individuals would be held accountable if they participate in financially supporting digital extortion. So, if a CEO or CISO decides to pay, they may go to jail. We have other regulations, such as Sarbanes-Oxley which are similar.

$ 0.00
User's avatar M.Rosenquist
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

So you want to use violence against people who believe paying with their own money to get their data back is in their best interest?

Flawed logic: "We have other laws so we need this one."

$ 0.00
3 weeks ago

Not violence, but legal accountability. That money is going to fund criminals who will attack other innocent victims. Aiding and abetting the enemy. Should your neighbor be allowed to pay a criminal to attack you?

$ 0.00
User's avatar M.Rosenquist
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

My neighbor has the right to pay a ransom to recover their child alive. I have the right to defend myself from any attacker with the best weapons and tactics available.

$ 0.00
3 weeks ago

What are your thoughts in that scenario that if by paying that ransom, you knew that the attacker would then target more children and families in your community. That you would be actively contributing to ever greater harms and put your children in even more danger in the future (ransomware gangs like re-attacking previous victims that have a history of paying). When does it become a society question for the community?

$ 0.00
User's avatar M.Rosenquist
This user is who they claim to be.
We have manually verified this user via some other channel.
Proof
3 weeks ago

You are trying to bait me into appearing like I do not care about others but only myself, when in reality you just want to use violence to force your ideas on others, because you know what is best, or you think some guy in some office somewhere knows what is best for us.

As I said, everyone has the right to defend themselves by whatever means necessary, If there is a heavy threat in the community to children and families being targets the men in that community should arm themselves or hire armed protection services. This will solve the issue without trying to enact violence on innocent and uninvolved parties.

No child rapist will come within 1 mile of that place.

$ 0.00
3 weeks ago