Weird Laws Filipinos Still Have To Live With

1 12
Avatar for Jthan
Written by
3 years ago

Much the same as the remainder of the world, the Philippines additionally has its own special arrangement of laws that are peculiar, obsolete or simply solid through and through wrong to current ears.

While a portion of these laws are pretty plain as day, a decent piece requires something beyond a superficial look for one to get them.

It's considerably all the more amazing to realize that most, if not all, of the laws recorded underneath are still essentially today, so it's presumably a smart thought to become acquainted with additional about them, in case you end up accidentally breaking one.

All things considered, obliviousness of the law pardons nobody.

Republic Act 8353 (The Anti-Rape Law of 1997), which was an enormous jump forward in the nation's drive against attackers, shockingly, had a little mishap, explicitly Article 266 Section C which states:

"The ensuing substantial marriage between the annoyed party will stifle the criminal activity or the punishment forced. In the event that it is the lawful spouse who is the wrongdoer, the ensuing pardoning by the wife as the insulted party will douse the criminal activity or the punishment: Provided, that the wrongdoing will not be quenched or the punishment will not be subsided if the marriage is void stomach muscle initio."

The wrongdoer being liberated from criminal risk in the wake of wedding the casualty is tied near a Spanish-time arrangement in the Revised Penal Code, explicitly Article 344 which states "in instances of enchantment, kidnapping, demonstrations of obscenity and assault, the marriage of the guilty party with the insulted party will quench the criminal activity or dispatch the punishment previously forced upon him."

Concerning the absolution thing, the reasoning behind it is to manage the cost of the culpable spouse an opportunity to begin once again with his significant other.

14. Grown-ups ( 21 – 25-year-olds) actually need counsel from their folks before getting hitched.

Article 15 of the Family Code of the Philippines

For couples of this specific age class, Article 15 of the Family Code expresses that:

"Any contracting party between the age of 21 and 25 will be obliged to approach their folks or watchman for exhortation upon the expected marriage. On the off chance that they don't acquire such counsel, or it be horrible, the marriage permit will not be given until following three months following the consummation of the distribution of the application.

A sworn proclamation by the contracting gatherings such that such guidance has been looked for, along with the composed counsel given, assuming any, will be connected to the application for marriage permit. Should the guardians or gatekeeper won't offer any guidance, this reality will be expressed in the sworn proclamation."

Albeit in fact it doesn't banish the candidates from wedding, the "90-day rule" on the issuance of the marriage permit implies the couple who didn't get positive parental counsel (not horrible) would need to stand by an additional three months before getting the marriage permit, a conventional essential to getting hitched.

The standard is intended to give them an opportunity to adjust the contradicting guardian's perspective just as give them a period to choose if they need to proceed with the marriage or not.

13. A political race tie should be broken by drawing of lots. An political decision tie in the Philippines should be broken by drawing of parcels

During the last 2013 general races, two up-and-comers in a real sense flipped a coin for the mayorship of the town of San Teodoro, Oriental Mindoro after the two men ended up tied in the race.

While the entire strategy may look offbeat, it's really secured by the Omnibus Election Code which expresses that "the leading body of campaigners will continue to the drawing of loads of the competitors who have tied and will announce as chosen the applicants who might be supported by karma… "

It's likewise upheld by Comelec Resolution No. 9648 wherein "the Board quickly advise the said possibility to show up before them for the attracting of parcels to break the tie. The drawing of parcels ought to be directed inside one (1) hour after issuance of notice by the Board to the up-and-comers concerned."

Obviously, drawing of parts isn't remarkable to our constituent framework—a few states in the US utilize the strategy also.

12. You can even now get imprisoned "for culpable strict emotions."

This dark punitive law, which goes back to the strictly intense Spanish time and which was the fundamental charge against Carlos Celdran, states that "the punishment of arresto civic chairman in its most extreme period to prision correccional in its base period will be forced upon any individual who, in a spot dedicated to strict love or during the festival of any strict function, will perform acts famously hostile to the sentiments of the loyal."

It tends to be found in Article 133 of the Revised Penal Code.

11. Widows must watch "301-day rule" before wedding again. Widows must watch "301-day rule" before wedding again in the Philippines

Segment 351 of the Revised Penal Code expresses that "any widow who will wed inside 300 and one day from the date of the demise of her better half, or before having conveyed on the off chance that she will have been pregnant at the hour of his passing, will be rebuffed by arresto city hall leader and a fine not surpassing 500 pesos."

The reasoning behind this was to "forestall disarray regarding the paternity and filiation of the kid," in actuality making this additionally an "upheld grieving period" for ladies as per its faultfinders who state that the approach of current innovation which makes paternity testing promptly accessible has delivered this law out of date.

Representative Nancy Binay as of now has a bill attempting to revoke it.

10. You can't possess a savage "pana.""Anti-Pana Law" in the Philippines

One of the more dark laws made during the 1960s was Republic Act No. 3553, or the "Counter Pana Law".

Under this law, "any individual who has a lethal bolt or 'pana' without a grant from a city, city, or metropolitan area chairman, will be rebuffed by detainment for a time of at the very least thirty days nor over a half year.

The expression 'destructive bolt' or 'pana' as utilized in this Act implies any bolt or dart that when shot from a blow or slingshot can cause injury or passing of an individual."

Notwithstanding, any individual who utilizes the "pana" for his work can even now apply for a license from his/her city hall leader. We're speculating the expanding number of "pana" occurrences prodded the formation of this law.

9. Your relatives and parents in law who perpetrate robbery, cheating, and malignant naughtiness against you are not criminally obligated.

Article 332 of the Revised Penal Code expresses that "No lawbreaker, yet just polite risk will result from the commission of the wrongdoing of robbery, cheating, or vindictive wickedness submitted or caused commonly by the accompanying people:

  1. Mates, ascendants, and relatives, or family members by partiality in a similar line.

  2. The bereft life partner as for the property which had a place with the expired companion before the equivalent will have passed into the ownership of another.

  3. Siblings and sisters and brothers by marriage and sisters-in-law, if living respectively.

Concerning why the annoyed party can't seek after criminal allegations, it is on the ground of safeguarding family amicability and solidarity.

8. Hunching down isn't a wrongdoing.

Republic Act 8368 or the "Counter Squatting Law Repeal Act of 1997" canceled previous President Marcos' Presidential Decree No. 772 which punished hunching down, actually making it a non-wrongdoing starting today on the premise that vagrants are additionally survivors of an inconsistent equity and social framework.

As a little reassurance to the hapless land owners, notwithstanding, the demonstration actually punishes "proficient vagrants and partners" as indicated by the arrangements of another dubious law, Republic Act 7279, which is also called the Lina Law.

7. Metro Manila has a tangled traffic conspire.

First actualized by the MMDA in 1995, the Unified Vehicle Volume Reduction Program's unique object was to diminish gridlock in the city through a number coding plan.

Vehicles with tags finishing in a specific number were not permitted in the city in a specific day. From that point forward, in any case, drivers have regularly whined about the disarray welcomed on by urban communities actualizing their own varieties (shading coding included) of the plan.

6. Our migration laws are incredibly antiquated.

District Act No. 613 or the movement law smells of ancient times, considering it was made and executed in 1940.

Among the numerous obsolete segments incorporate Section 29-A which denies passage to outsiders experiencing madness, accursed or perilous infectious maladies, or epilepsy. It additionally avoids poor people, transients, bums, or people who practice polygamy or who have faith in or advocate the act of polygamy.

A bill right currently is being pushed to refresh this many years old law.

5. Ladies get accused of infidelity, men get accused of concubinage. Article 333 and 334 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines

One gander at Article 333 and 334 of the Revised Penal Code and you can perceive any reason why the law will in general be stacked against ladies.

Charging a spouse for an extra-conjugal undertaking in court is boundlessly harder to demonstrate since the lady needs to demonstrate any or the entirety of the accompanying:

a. He has kept a fancy woman in the intimate dwelling.

b. He will have sex with a lady who isn't his better half under outrageous conditions.

c. He will live together with her in some other spot.

What's more, in any event, when the spouse is indicted, he will all things considered carry out a punishment of just a half year to four years while his special lady would just be hit with destierro or expulsion.
Then again, verification of sex between his better half and another man is all a spouse requires to accuse them both of infidelity which can convey a punishment of two to six years.

Regarding why the punishment for infidelity is heavier, it is contended that an unlawful undertaking between a spouse and her lover could bring about an ill-conceived kid who might turn into the unconscious husband's false beneficiary.

4. Irritating individuals can be charged for being just irritating.

The second passage of Article 287 states that "some other compulsion or shameful vexations will be rebuffed by arresto menor or a fine going from 5 pesos to 200 pesos, or both."

Both lawful specialists and laymen have denounced unreasonable vexation as a questionable catch-all arrangement with no particular importance, just something to accuse irritating individuals of.

3. The State will do its best to get a couple to remain married. Marriage law in the Philippines

Ever can't help thinking about why, Catholic culture in any case, it's so difficult for couples to move away from cold or miserable relationships in the Philippines?

It is on the grounds that the State is commanded to do as such as indicated by Section 2, Article XV of the 1987 Constitution which expresses that "marriage, as a sacred social organization, is the establishment of the family and will be ensured by the State."

A milestone choice by the Supreme Court in 1997 maintained this arrangement when it expressed that "any uncertainty ought to be settled for the presence and continuation of the marriage and against its disintegration and nullity."

In exactly the same case, the high court additionally requested mediocre courts to require the presence of a monetary and a specialist from the Solicitor General's office as a direction to speak to the State during invalidation hearings and compose whether he/she affirms of the dissolution or not.

At the end of the day, the State will consistently be the outsider in any marriage between people.

2. We still give out exorbitant punishments for defamation.

Maybe no other law of late has accumulated as much discussion as Republic Act No. 10175 or the Cybercrime Law, explicitly the part where it rebuffs defamation.

The comparing punishments can be found in Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code. Pundits have considered it a bygone and obsolete arrangement going back to the Spanish time where honor was profoundly valued and duels were regularly normal.

These days it's being manhandled by government authorities as a shield against reactions. Indeed, even the United Nations Human Rights Council proclaimed the punishments as "unnecessary" and keeping in mind that there are moves to decriminalize criticism, we may need to stand by a long time before it turns into a relic of days gone by.

1. You can "lawfully" execute individuals.

Under Article 247 of the Revised Code, anybody "who having shocked his life partner in the demonstration of submitting sex with someone else, will execute any of them or the two of them in the demonstration or promptly from that point, or will incur upon them any genuine physical injury, will endure the punishment of destierro."

In like manner, the article likewise applies to guardians "concerning their little girls under eighteen years old, and their enticer, while the girls are living with their folks."

The normal overpowering shock and the need to vindicate one's honor would shape the reasoning of why executing is permitted under these conditions. Then again, destierro or simple expulsion of the executioner is keep the expired's family from fighting back against him.

$ 0.05
$ 0.05 from @TheRandomRewarder
Sponsors of Jthan
Avatar for Jthan
Written by
3 years ago


I truly love this strong article of yours. It sounds meaningful and with sense. I thinks, you have to be the greatest writter of all time dear. Keep it up

$ 0.00
3 years ago