EXECUTIVE HASHPOWER

0 469
Avatar for JavierGonzalez
Written by
  7
2 weeks ago (Last updated: 2 days ago)

Miners are the Executive Power of Bitcoin. And Executive Hashpower is what happens when miners decide to act, no following markets. Temporarily, ignoring short-term profit, because of thinking in a imaginary future profit (monetary or reputational), in a infrequent but decisive act of business creativity.

Of course, users -through markets- have absolute power in long-term. But not in short-term, because markets cannot act. Markets judge time later very well. But markets can not make efficient decisions about complex software engineering. Because innovation is never born in markets, humans must act first. [Devs or Miners? Next article?]

In contradiction with the official narrative about what is and how Bitcoin works, few know the decisive significance of these acts.

Fortunately, when miners act, the truth is written in stone, on-chain, for ever.

Five on-chain evidences:

1) 2010-08-15 — 51 blocks reorg event

A decade ago, in height 74637, an accidental split occurred, caused by a bug in version 0.3.10. Miners accepted the loss of 51 blocks, fixing the problem by reorg with a hotfix, in 6 hours and 51 minutes.

The Bitcoin project was not damaged, it was like if nothing had happened. Except that this is my first evidence of executive hashpower, in action, to save Bitcoin.

2) 2013-03-11 — 24 blocks reorg event

Seven years ago, executive hashpower saved the Bitcoin project again, with a reorg of 24 blocks to executing a downgrade, in height 225430, because a bug in 0.8.0, fixed in 1 hour and 25 minutes. With the first reported double-spend, as collateral damage.

It was coordinated in an off-chain informal chat room: [Better in the BMP?]

When Pieter said "please" to BTC Guild pool operator, it wasn't just a courtesy. It's that only miners can do it, losing their money, in short-term, to save Bitcoin.

3) 2017-08-01 — BTC-BCH split event

1MB block limit dispute resulted in the split in which Bitcoin Cash was born.

Not the moment to evaluate this act. [Next article?] Just to mention that the first BCH block, height 478559, with difficulty algorithm modified, required a mining effort during 4 hours and 56 minutes. Was an act ignoring markets, which open days later.

4) 2018-11-15 — BCH-BSV split event

One year ago, the BCH-BSV split event occurred, in BCH height 556767.
[Hashpower can prevent splits? Enforced is legitimate? Next article?]

It was also the first Bitcoin hashwar. Declared by a belligerent mining force that only two days before split controlled the majority of BCH hashpower.

In this scenario, checkpoints or deep reorg "protection" cannot protect the Bitcoin blockchain. Actually these pieces of code never acted.

The existential threat was constituted. In response, some Bitcoin miners displaced a significant amount of BTC hashpower, during 9 days, to protect BCH from the takeover attempt of what we now know as BSV. This prevented the existence of BAB, which was the target of the adversary force. By executive hashpower act, to protect Bitcoin Cash.

I created this graph with information from the blockchain and the market price history [thanks to Blockchair as data provider]. It is a visual evidence of executive hashpower.

DARI = (COINBASE + FEES) / DIFFICULTY * (BITCOIN / USD)
EXECUTIVE_HASHPOWER = ABS(DARI(BTC) - DARI(BCH))

This allows the creation of a "hashwar detector". And allows to measure and compare the intensity of future hashwar.

The same event, with more resolution and different source (fork.lol)
The same event, with different source (coin.dance)

5) 2019-05-15 — 2 blocks reorg to revert Segwit steal

Seven months ago, something spectacular happened.

The planned upgrade was successful, despite a poisoned TX attack. Then, unknown miner made a second attack, creating a block -first seen and totally valid- stealing the Segwit funds send by mistake to the BCH blockchain.

A new kind of event happened in BCH height 582698.

My notes hours later

BTC.TOP pool -which already had a large amount of hashpower in BCH because of prudence- did this skillfully and audaciously executive action:

  1. Detection of the segwit theft block.

  2. Creation of a block like the block theft, but without the transactions from the segwit theft (more details in Coinbase report).

  3. Make the decision to act. [Manual or automatic? Next article?]

  4. Stop and start mining the repair block.

  5. Reorg of the block segwit theft.

  6. Reorg of the block collaterally lost by ProHashing.

  7. Without any double-spends.

All this, in production, executed by hashpower, in only 11 minutes.

This act was against the short-term incentive.
Which is to follow markets, allow theft and continue mining normally.

In fact, if miners only follow short-term benefit -as many believe- the most beneficial strategy is to steal all segwit funds in the next BCH block...

But this is not happening; every 10 minutes.

Javier González González
2019-01-14

Summary table

* My independent research and development is active and I'm still learning. If you want to report a problem, show me evidences or collaborate please write me at gonzo@virtualpol.com. Thank you!

$ 3.80
$ 2.00 from @btcfork
$ 1.00 from @ErdoganTalk
$ 0.50 from @Bon
+ 2
Avatar for JavierGonzalez
Written by
  7
2 weeks ago (Last updated: 2 days ago)
Enjoyed this article?  Earn Bitcoin Cash by sharing it! Explain
...and you will also help the author collect more tips.

Comments

About us Rules What is Bitcoin Cash? Roadmap Affiliate program Get sponsors Self-host
hello@read.cash (PGP key) Reddit