Good morning good people, let get down to business.
I have thought , wrote about different kind of political ideology and socialization trying to find which one is the best, however I haven't been able to decepier the best among all as all seem to have absolute advantage with what the citizen accept. The common concept of politics now adays are; Democracy , Mornarchy and Oligarchy.
Previous thoughts and my perception even in my own limited and local research has made me had some personal bias, that only a part of political concept is the best. As well as I began to search and broading my research more on the international politics I discover sovereignity from the people gives every kind of governance or system the legitimate to function as a state (country).
Democracy is a system of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. It is a government where by people participate either directly or indirectly. Abraham Lincoln defines democracy simple as ' government of the people ,by the people's and for the people'.
The people is supereme here and every power and rights belongs to them, they are duly represented and main power is vested upon them. Democracy is said to begin in Greece at 5 century BC. The United State of America is a perfect example of Democracy. In my narrowed research I breakdown democracy into Ideal democracy , True democracy and Near democracy. The ideal democracy is the theoretical aspect of how democracy should be and that is not really practical. we could only see the true and near democracy in some part of the world .
Monarchy definition is - undivided rule or absolute sovereignty by a single person.( Merriam- webstar ). Monarchy is a form of government based on a single individual which may be a king, queen, emperor, these positions are for life except for addiction.
Morchay only give room for a single individual to hold power. However they are absolute monarch and constitution monarch. Absolute monarch rule as all head of the executive unlike constituted monarch which shares the executive function with another person who is the head of government while monarch I the head of state. The Queen of England is a good example of a constituted monarch.
Oligarchy is a form of government rule by the few people. Few people of high connection rules the country, due to certain psychological set aside by the people of the country there are more people who believes some democrate state also practice this aspect. A good example is the Russian federation as the rulers are only few elites and are interconnected with themselves. Another example is the Zimbabwe, Where the believe is that only ex colonial independent war fighter can rule by the sacrifice of they contributed to the libration of the country.
However every form of government has been back by the sovereignty and the people has decided to obey the authority of every of the form of government. This has clearly shown how government has to be legitimately backed by the people no matter the form of governance is being used. After all the people are happy with the government in my conclusion I Believe there are no kind of government better than one another , people will only chose how the want to be governed. Therefore be it democracy , Mornarchy or oligarchy or what ever the people chose it all affairs of the state the sovereignty other the state to use a particular for as being backed by the people is so important and legitimately.
What are your thoughts?
Yes, each of these forms of Government are not better than one another. The most despised among them might be the best option that can be promoted by the people at a particular point in time.