The Previous Methods Used To Determine The Age of Fossil are Acceptable?
ARE THE PREVIOUS METHODS USED TO DETERMINE THE AGE OF A FOSSIL SUCH AS THE BONE OF DINOSAURS, SKULLS OF ANCIENT HUMAN BEINGS, TRACE OF SOME EXTINCT ANIMALS AND OTHERS ACCEPTABLE?
There are various old and new methods used to measure the age of a fossil and the most popular of these is the so-called Radiocarbon dating method. They know this by measuring the number of decaying radioactive isotopes in Carbon-14 from their fossils.
The element Carbon is one of the essential elements for every organism.
Carbon-14 is formed in our atmosphere by the sun. All living things on the Earth map, plants, animals, or humans have C-14 in the body. The plant normally receives C-14 in the form of photosynthesis. Plant-eating animals will also have it, and for us to also have C-14 there are only two things that can be done, you eat a plant or you eat a plant-eating animal. In short, we get it because of the Food Chain. And when the animal or plant dies, it stops receiving C-14. They compare the number of C-14 in the body of the animal with the number of C-14 in the atmosphere.
However, this method of comparison is not accurate, the atmosphere indeed continues to gather Carbon-14 from the Sun but it also continues to decrease to decompose every 5,600 years. The organism that dies is just continuous in decay and reduction, it is a process of changing the isotopes into fossils (Carbon, to Radium to Radon to become Lead). Even if they find the entire fossil, the decay of the elements will continue. Scientists know that.
They say that the equilibrium of Carbon-14s in the atmosphere is still 30,000 years old, so that means that the Earth is less than 30,000 years old, which is contrary to what they say is billions of years old, is it? However, this is one of their mistakes.
The radiocarbon dating method has never been based on the age of fossils. It is a pseudoscience (false science) and unscientific method.
In 1975, a baby mammoth was found frozen where they carbon-dated part of it 40,000 years and its skin was carbon-dated 26,000 years, two different years in the same animal. And the wood next to the mammoth is Carbon dated 9-10,000 years old, very wrong. There are many records like this, examples of inaccuracy in carbon.
A shell from a living Snail was Carbon dated which turned out to be 27,000 dead. A living Mollusk shell was also Carbon dated to be 2,300 years old. It was just a dying Seal there is a date where he died 1,300 years ago, and a living Penguin that is said to be 8,000 years old. There are also materials from the layers next to the dinosaur that has been Carbon dated to be 34,000 years old, so does that mean dinosaurs still lived 34,000 years ago. This is contrary to what they say hundreds of millions of years ago they lived and disappeared? So it doesn't make sense, and also impossible.
Scientists sometimes measure the age of a fossil through layers of soil called Geological excavation or they base the age of the rock on the method of potassium-argon dating to determine its age or that of an extinct dinosaur. millions of years ago. Then they compare it with their imaginary geological time or column that they invented where everything is also not accurate.
An example of that is the trilobite fossil that is believed to have lived in the Cambrian period 600 million years ago .. but a paleontologist discovered a fossilized shoe print that rested on a trilobite fossil, it was stained on the ground. Now, how could a person step on a trilobite at a time when only pure water was said to exist?
When in those layers that are hundreds of millions of years old you see a tree standing, do you think logically that that tree was still standing a hundred million years ago? It can't live that long in another time and remain standing still. We are talking about hundreds of millions of years. No dry tree will stand that long or stay until now.
On the other hand, where a long artificial bridge was discovered in India that is man-made thousand of years ago, but in Radiometric dating results it turns out that this bridge is 1.7 million years old, so does it mean that there were intelligent people and a civilization a million years ago? An ordinary shaped wheel was found in the Donetsk mine but the age shows that it is 360-300 million years old, so there is a wheel, was it 300 million years ago? A type of screw was also found embedded in the hard rock which is 300 million years old, there is also an electric connector in the rock, which is 100,000 years old when it exists, and many others. Therefore, the old methods will never be accurate, and there is no basis for it.
Scientists often start with an observation based on a limited period to write their conclusions over the past thousands of years and on time to come, or they base conclusions on a limited space, to conclude. on the infinity of space, man always makes repeated mistakes based on his knowledge. It's just like the people or scientists back then who used the horizon as a basis to say that the Earth is flat.
This is true for old histories, such as the methods based on radioactivity named “Carbon 14”, potassium-argon, uranium-lead thorium, or all other such methods.
In short, the error in these old methods is to start with the principle that the present atomic movement has always been the same, and starting from there, to make calculations based on false information because nothing is invariable in the universe in time or space.
All life on Earth began only a few thousand years ago and not millions of years which is contrary to the explanation of experts. This proves that there are many mistakes in our science regarding our history.
Copyright ©️ 2021 GuyFromNowhere, All Rights Reserve