Thursday, August 6th, 2020
The Read.cash community is still shocked by the Meme contest which led to the explosion and departure of the creator of Read.cash.
I won't go back on the fact that led to the actual situation, but I think most of the Read.cash community regret that departure and is still hoping for his come back.
More personally, @Read.Cash have all my support for the free work this only person did, leading to paying thousands of users coming from a lot of country in the world, developing their knowledge and offer them a wonderful tool to use for any activity.
The only limit of Read.cash is the human creativity.
The way this person created this platform with his personal money have to inspire people, particularly these days when Bitcoin Cash community is fighting each other.
My though is that there is a lack of volunteering in the crypto community in general. Most of users are missing the most important point of crypto-currencies and I am quite sad to see how the "Satoshi revolution" is used.
From the user who just see USD eq. to leaderboard of BCH staff who are fighting each other for power, you are all missing that the main point of this technology is decentralization and equality.
This technology give to all people a common financial rule for all user, with no way for States to prohibit a money movement from a state to another.
That's the point. The only point why crypto was created. Using crypto as a support for real money or trying to grab the power is the opposite way of what crypto is about.
With this introduction, you could think "there is no fucking link between the title and what your are writing".
You are right. The point I wanted to show is related to Read.cash. This platform was created by voluntering, to share to the most people this technology. But using it like it is is not fair.
Early BCH adopters tips large amount to other early BCH early adopters, and not to new users while they are to future of BCH.
I won't blame it, most of the content on this platform is low-quality when it is not just plagiarism.
People try to be rewarded but don't understand why and how. You can't see many comment beside "early BCH users" post that doesn't make sense at all. These post are lost between article about flower or kitchen recipe.
To incentive people to write great content, I have a suggestion :
BCH paid by the funds shouldn't be withdrew by users but only tipped to other.
You could think it is unfair for new users, but it will incentive them to tip good content with their BCH coming from the fund, and to write good content to be tipped.
With this feature, news "great-quality" users will be tipped and they will appears as "good authors". Read.cash fund will work like a fund : BCH coming from the fund will be used to tip users, then they will be able to withdraw their tip.
Only BCH tips could be withdrew, not BCH fund coming from the fund. Daily spent will remain to the same amount, but only BCH tip will go outside the platform.
Let me know in comment your though and I hope you enjoyed the reading.