How about reviewing moderators status at read.cash. part 2

Oh thanks, that was an error. Thanks for the correction. I will update it right away.

You can post as many articles you can a day. But it must not be to one community. So you have to join as many Communities as you can to be able to submit a numbers of articles daily

That means we will have to pay in all this communities and let's take a look at something ,there will be a situation where some people wont get upvoted even though they pay are you going to say that is fair?? Do you think they will like to do that?

And also the part of the 50/50 I think that is too much because it will be like the moderator can decide not to post contents but only moderate for payment and also through that a lot of communities will be created by people for the love of the money.

Let wait to see what @read.cash will say about it. Moreover, this is not only to benefit the moderators but also the authors since every community members is to support each other by direct tipping. All of us will be having more money.

Yes certainly

Not at all. You must give them back what they give you. It will just be money going around, which is not benefiting anyone.

You mean when we support each other as said in this article doesn't benefits anyone.

There are two perspectives here: the one of moderators, and the one of authors.

What you say would benefit moderators, but for authors it is meaningless since the same money will just wander around in the community. It is of no use for you to get much tips if you also must give much tips.

Supporting each other in a circle is meaningless. I give you one dollar and you give me one dollar. Then we would both be better off not doing anything, then at least we would not have to pay transaction fee or money to readcash and moderators - costs that actually make us lose money.

I'm a moderator myself, in many communities, I would welcome some compensation for the work involved; but as an author I would not participate in that sort of system.

I think you didn't see it clearly, there's a limit to what an author can give. Every author set his or her limit as you can see on the screenshot. You chose the percentage you are willing to support the community with. And also you chose how much tips you can give to fellow authors.

I understand that, but it doesn't change the principle; what you want to implement is a community tax.

Let me take it this way - I know I am slipping over to my other objection here, but it is really the major one: is the BCH you have in the wallet yours?

If you answer that question with yes, how can you then say that members should be obliged to tip others in the same community? If I cannot do what I want with my money, it is not my money. So why do we have the tip system at all?

And what should I do if I want to tip an article because in my opinion the author is good, but the moderator of his or her community is bad? Knowing that a part of my tips goes to the moderator, I might refrain from tipping the author. (And yes, there are some that bad moderators.)

The tips must belong to the author, to do with whatever he or she wants - no obligation to use it or any part of it in this or that way; and the one giving tips, must know that the tips is going to the author.

Jdine's suggestion is better, because it can benefit moderators without being at the cost of authors.

Exactly amd with this some people's hard earned money will be going to the pockets of moderators (bad ones) . Although the work is tedious as a moderator but what about the author?

Some authors waste a whole lot of time in creating and make a lot of money on their articles in return ,does that mean they should have to share it with the moderator?

And I think also that making tipping compulsory will help moderators not authors because let's say if 20 people tip $1 each to 20 different authors in a day and per his suggestion of 50/50 the moderators are going in for $10 while the author take say $0.5 although they worked hard for their articles..

You did not get it right, the 50/50 is only a suggestion, everyone can set what percentage he can give. The only issue there is not to make it a compulsory to give to moderators. However, the tipping can be left open to anyone who feels like supporting a particular Community of choice.

Looking at the topic of the article itself says a review, that means it's not an end to itself. Everyone has to say what he or she thinks is best solution to the subject. My suggestions are only my thought, you can make your suggestions, hopefully @read.cash look into all suggestions made and pick out anyone that might be a good solution. @Jdine got inspired by this article and came up with a brilliant and smart suggestion that can be quick and easy to implement if considered.

Ultimately, the whole readcash system is impossible if authors remain the only tipping readers. It just cannot work in the long run. Readcash must attract external readers, readers who are not writers, and somehow get them into the tipping system. That in turn, is a formidable problem. Why should they take the trouble to register membership and purchase BCH, just to be able to tip what they read for free anyway? Not realistic.

So what is there to do? The fund and advertising to create a regular stream of income to the fund. I can imagine some legal problems setting that up though. But we won't debate that now.

Let hope it works out.

Well I don't think so, the only issue there is the obligation to members to tip each other. Maybe that part will be like a tax or something like that as mentioned by @mictorrani. I might probably remove that part from the suggestions. Thanks

If you put it in a way that looks like it's a tax, i can get where you're coming from, I'm just considering the new set of events which is the upvote groups

That was only part of the suggestions. From what @Jdine wrote, I got another idea which is to leave the tipping option open to anyone who feels like supporting any community of choice. Like this no one will feel obligated to support a moderator. It will be a free will offering.

That seems like a better option and is as it should be though since an obligation will raise complaints somehow for those who are so focused on earning and not is simply sharing and helping

That's what I was trying to state at on the last paragraph of this article. People are so full of themselves, no one wants to support another. Those who are tipping articles here did not bring the money from here, they made it here and love to spend it here. Most of the top Tippers here don't even have time to write article always. You know what my friend, I joined a platform few days ago, with just my introduction post I got a numbers of encouraging tipping and a series of comments requesting me to join one Community or the other with promise of how they support Community members. In three days I got 47 subscribers.

I was at the point where I was trying to give back by tipping the tips I got back to some people 😂 because it felt amazing to get tipped

Oh? That's a really openly supportive community. What is that? It would be great if this community was at that point too but then maybe it was the only earning nethod on the site?

It was not the only earning method, you earn hive points just like we're earning points for bch here.

that sounds like a really tempting website.. Imind making me an affiliate there? XD

The article leave room for more suggestions, your suggestion here is good and can be a smart one if considered. To say someone tipping you from his or her wallet is abused on the system is not true. As long as it's doesn't affect read.cssh funds I don't think that is an abused. People are giving out sponsorships to as many people as possible here on daily basis, isn't it their money? What would it be if the sponsorship was from read.cash funds, would it not be considered abused of sponsorship right? I think supporting one another with our money isn't related to upvote for upvote because is your money.

but isn't upvoting come from our own funds too? I'm confused now ahhaaha

No, upvote on the thumb comes from read.cash funds. Only tipping comes from your funds though they are both refers as upvote.

oh you mean liking the article... yeah yeah hehehe

That's why read.cash is penalizing people for abusing it for upvote to upvote.

I thought @Read.Cash meant paid upvotes

If it's your money you are spending to upvote someone why will anyone question you. Aren't people giving out sponsorship to as many people they feel like. Is their money, if they chose to waste nobody cares. But when it comes from@read.cash funds it is a cheat on the funds.

I thought because paid upvotes give you points in random rewards aside from the tip you are given that's why it was abused. Sponsorship is different in paid upvotes in many ways. You don't get points that give you more chance in random rewards when you're sponsored. That was what I was thinking. I didn't know Readcash meant liking each others content. I thought they meant the paid upvote.

Each time someone like your content you earn points, that's why you have power users who upvote post randomly to give points to the author.

Exactly... And when someone tip you, isn't that upvote too? I'm confused now ahahhaa

Yeah is upvote, but not from read.cash funds but from the person's wallet

Ahhh I see... So liking is what's not allowed not paid upvoting each other?

Paid upvote is like a gift to someone else. You can gift your money, that's nobody Business, is your morning. But when people say like me I like you, that's what is not allowed.