BCHA: What do you value?

9 466
Avatar for Cain
Written by
3 years ago

Friday, December 4th, 2020

We recently witnessed something that's never happened in the 12 year history of Bitcoin. An entire community forking together at the drop of a hat to get rid of a single bozo.

Some have framed this as a bad thing, but to me it was a demonstration of the BCHA community's values. For example, I didn't see one person who had a problem with what happened, and within a day everything was pretty much back to normal.

Skeptics want to say this isn't Bitcoin, but I believe this is exactly what Bitcoin is about. To me achieving consensus ultimately comes down to the people in a community and what they value. It's not about how much hashing power a chain has, or the total accumulated proof of work. Consensus is reached by those in the ecosystem who make it valuable to begin with.

Some have been saying what about the value of disincentives, as in the value of disincentivizing future forks from happening. But isn't that exactly what Bitcoin is fighting against? To me Bitcoin represents freedom. The freedom to participate in the global economy, the freedom to transact, and the freedom to explore new ideas.

I say what needs to be disincentivized are those who seek to suppress these freedoms, those who wish to prevent healthy competition and the proliferation of new ideas.

We shouldn't be punishing people for wanting to try something new and competing honestly in the marketplace. We should be punishing those who wish to stop them.

I support the BCHA project because I believe it embodies everything I value, such as the freedom to try new things, and the freedom to profit from your work. I also value people with ability and drive, as well as having a way to invest in such people and profiting together.

In many ways, I feel like BCHA has given us a chance to rewind the clock and redo Bitcoin. But this time instead of relying on developers having to work for sponsorships or donations, Bitcoin ABC is finally professionalizing Bitcoin by aligning their incentives with the rest of the ecosystem.

Imagine finally having a network that offers near instant confirmations, that proves resilient against attackers, a network that's fast, and cheap, and can handle as many transactions as we need it to.

But a network like that isn't just going to build itself, and that's why we hired Bitcoin ABC to get it done. At today's prices, I'd say it's a bargain considering we're getting the CTO you can almost never afford.

3
$ 11.08
$ 5.00 from @TobiasRuck
$ 4.62 from @TheRandomRewarder
$ 0.50 from @Big-Bubbler
+ 5
Avatar for Cain
Written by
3 years ago

Comments

I am fine with trying something new. It's what people do and why we have so much luxury in our lives. I cannot say Bitcoin or any altcoin represents freedom since everything is, since November 17, 2020, under control of our National Bank. This means freedom and being anonymous is definitely over.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

What country is this? And that's what Bitcoin is for. As long as you control your private keys, no one can prevent you from transacting with it.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

nice read on events, well the split was on the cards always and will need to work as its the cards we are dealt,

moving forward I decided to sell bchn and turn all to bcha.

Turned to the Bcha chain on fork day after it was confirmed.

never thought the big pools would follow the bchn side came as a shock.

but i believe the hash on bchn is paid for and secured by Ver and co. since the previous fork. meaning they paid for the machines to be run by the pool operators and they continue to pay for electricity.

the attack was done by who knows-friends of ver- but again a shock mid week when chain was rolled back invalid block, nice touch and nice to see it work.

you can only go up from the bottom,

the best thing coinflex could of done, they done.

by starting the future price, and this is good as they could of made both coins same value to make it even choice for investor, but since they made their side win before it even started, makes you think that it was inside arrangement that was not thought 100%.

shows how young an immature crypto is.

bchn is not going to last at this rate, with ltc taken over.

I seen btc at the 30 cent days and never touched it as was too dark web associated at the time and knew new tech would surpass in future,

a guy i knew would spend 100's of btc for 20buks of weed.

if i took any btc from this guy i am sure he would and others would be giving me problems today.

look at the mining hardware used today this is a example as we came from cpu to asic,

they thought btc should never leave cpu/gpu. and any new tech surpasses the old cpu to asic.

goodluck to all projects and hope they can do something meaningful.

please no donations as i am all in on the bcha only side and have no bchn wallet anymore.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Glad to have you on board the BCHA train.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

We recently witnessed something that's never happened in the 12 year history of Bitcoin. An entire community forking together at the drop of a hat to get rid of a single bozo.

Not sure if this was intentional but I honestly thought you were talking about Amaury Séchet here ;-)

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I would have preferred that a hard fork didn’t happen and both sides came to some sort of a consensus instead. It would have been a better outcome for everyone.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

As long as the consensus included a reliable developer-funding strategy I would agree. That was not possible this time. I think anti-BCH forces made sure there was no chance of a win-win result this time.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

You're not seeing the entire picture is why you feel that way.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

no, it wouldn't.

$ 0.00
3 years ago