Why do Conspiracy Theorists Ignore Real Conspiracies?

If we exam the rich in this world we will discover not paying taxes is common and not only if it comes to kings, queens, presidents but many multinationals as well (besides of their debts).

As long as the attention of the dumb nations can be focussed on something else (covid19 for example) no one cares about the rest of the dirty tricks that are going on. Rapes, changing the law, killing the elderly, letting more abusive emigrants in, higher costs for health insurance, etc. It's how it works and if you ask me it works like that in the USA since the first emigrants set foot on the shore.

Let me preface this comment by saying that I consider myself centrist and perhaps individualist, and don't believe that I consistently lean much toward the traditional US "left" or "right". Further, I like reading your articles and consider you to be educated and free-thinking. Given this, I'm a bit surprised by your comments on Trump taxes. I think taxes are a thing that most US citizens simply don't understand, and I think politicians take extreme advantage of this in their politicking. In spite of what politicians would have you believe, there is no legal "cheating" of the tax system. When you lose money, it counts against the money you earn. While individual losses don't count against individual income (presumably because the average person can't do the accounting necessary to prove these losses and the temptation to cheat a bit with no audit-able records would be too much), individual investment gains and losses are treated in a very similar manner (the only difference being that the amount of investment losses that can be counted toward regular income is limited further than the actual amount of income, but even then, the losses beyond the limit offset future years vs being discarded). Further, any individual can start a business. If you spent $50,000 on whatever you need to start a business, but didn't take any income until the next calendar year, wouldn't you still want to deduct that $50,000 the next calendar year assuming you made over $50,000? If you only made $25,000, then wouldn't you want to deduct the remaining $25,000 the year after that? Same concept, larger scale. On the other side of the same coin, even though individuals can't deduct losses from their income, they don't have to take income when they sell something for less than they bought it for. IMO, suggesting Trump should have paid taxes even though he had prior losses would be no different than suggesting that everyone should pay income tax on things like vehicle trade-in. Do you think someone who buys a car for $30,000 and then trades it in for $15,000 a year or two later should be paying income tax on that $15,000? These are just simple examples, there are also plenty of other ways that our tax system actually provides an "unfair" advantage to lower-to-middle class individuals. Then there's the suggestion that income tax was avoided by paying consultant fees to his daughter. In such a scenario, even though Trump wouldn't have to pay taxes on those consultant fees, his daughter still would, so the tax burden would be transferred, not avoided. Considering all of that, IF the "leaked" tax return information is even legitimate, it only implies that Trump has had massive losses in the past that are still countering his current gains.

All of that having been said, take a look at Trump's historic reactions to each and every leak of each and every kind. Doesn't it seem odd that he's not throwing a bridezilla level fit about his tax records being leaked? I believe he has claimed they aren't real, which could be a true explanation, but if they are real, that missing behavior seems like an odd thing to overlook in an article about ignoring real conspiracies.

Good content plz subscribe me

excellent,,, article bro...