Questions that Destroy the Argument for Reparations (In the US)

15 422
Avatar for AntiSJWLeft
3 years ago

The following list of questions targets both the philosophical and practical grounds for reparations for decedents of slaves in the United States. This isn't about reparations in all cases, especially to those who were directly harmed by unjust actions (for example somebody who was shot by the police for no reason). The question of reparations for decedents of slaves has become a debate in the Democratic Party, with some of the Left wing (although not including Bernie Sanders!) voicing support for reparations. Feel free to add to the list in the comments:

Why should white people today, including those living in poverty, pay for what their ancestors did?

If low-income whites will be exempt from the tax, don't you think people will find a way to dodge it? (For example putting their money into crypto or otherwise obscuring the amount of wealth they have?)

What if a white person can not afford to pay for reparations? Will they be fined, or sent to jail for failure to pay taxes?

If a person refuses to pay the tax on ideological grounds, will they be fined or jailed for resisting?

In fact, how much will this all cost overall anyway?

What about the white family that immigrated here in the 1900s? Or even 2000s? Why should they have to pay for what people did before they were even in this country?

Taking the last question to its logical end, if a white person arrives in the US the day before a theoretical reparations tax is due, do they have to pay it? What if they become a citizen the day of the tax?

If a white person is here for an extended time, but is not a citizen, do they have to pay? If only white citizens have to pay, then wouldn't that discourage people from becoming citizens?

Who is to be put in charge of determining who is black?

Do white-passing people who are decedents of slaves count as black?

Who is to be put in charge of determining who is white? Do South Italians count? South Spaniards? Middle Eastern people? Jews? Slavs? All of those groups have been considered white or non-white at points in history.

What about mixed race people? Is somebody who is 3/4 white and 1/4 black free from paying reparations? Do they pay less reparations? What about somebody who is 1/4th native American, 1/4 black, and half white? Or any other mix?

Would a person who is a quarter white and 3/4 black get less in reparations than a somebody who is 100% black?

What about the decedents of abolitionists who did everything they could to end that system?

What about people who have both abolitionists and slave owners in their family tree?

What if someone is a decedent of both a slave and a slave-owner?

How will our nation deal with the intense racial divide and resentment this will cause?

A vast majority of white people in the US are decedents of people who came here after the end of slavery. Doesn't it seem weird to assign blame so...collectively?

How do you think the Democratic Party will survive the severe voting/political realignment this would cause? 85% of white people oppose reparations, and many will vote Republican if this happens. The Dems would get wiped out in most of the US.

Anywhere from a third to half of blacks oppose reparations. Why don't you listen to their opinions?

What about a black family that moved here only in the last decade or so? Are they entitled to reparations for something that happened 140+ years before they even came here?

Who will be in charge of determining if people fit all of the Demographic criteria above? How much would that new bureaucracy cost?

Finally, and I think one of the most important underlying flaws with the slavery reparations idea: Why do you not support reparations for other groups, like the LGBT community, non-religious people, Jews, Muslims, people living in poverty, disabled people, and especially Native Americans, all of whom are either facing discrimination right now, or have in very recent years? Don't they deserve reparations just as much? I mean, many of them were the actual people impacted, not just decedents 150 years later.

Conclusion:

The right-wing wins when people are divided by race. The left-wing wins when people are divided by class. The reparations debate does nothing but sidetrack the Democratic party and alienate voters in a way that would make it almost impossible for Democrats to win in the future.

Feel free to add more questions below, and share this to counter pro-reparations arguments wherever you see them. Thanks for reading, sharing, and tipping!


Sponsors of AntiSJWLeft
empty
empty
empty

For those who want to follow me: You can find me on Publish0x. The site is great, and you can cross post there to make more money than just posting on one site, so why not join? https://www.publish0x.com/@LeftAntiPC?a=pnel78MdKB&tid=rc

If you are reading this but are somehow not already a member of Read.Cash, follow this link to join: https://read.cash/r/AntiSJWLeft

63
$ 5.21
$ 4.43 from @TheRandomRewarder
$ 0.50 from @ErdoganTalk
$ 0.27 from @Telesfor
+ 1
Sponsors of AntiSJWLeft
empty
empty
empty
Avatar for AntiSJWLeft
3 years ago

Comments

Interesting article

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Wow

$ 0.00
3 years ago

If you ask me it's nonsense to let white people who live now pay for SOME black people living now. What happened hundreds of years ago did not happen to those who live today.

It's useless to argue about who is white or black, today many suddenly are called black and I can assure you they are whiter than me. Who will pay me for the way I am treated?

If it comes to slavery: it always existed (read history, the Bible, todays newspaper). How come no one cares about that?

Slavery is from all ages and long after it was forbidden African people kept catching, selling and using their neighbors as a slave! It's interesting not one single black person seems to remember that, recite it and hide that dark part of their past.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

You got to learn a lot more in this wonderful article with absolutely beautiful article write and We also have a lot of knowledge in this

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Yeah, I think you're point is right.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

nice

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Thanks shear this post.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Very good post

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Nice one

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Having native American blood I could ask from both white and black people how they see reparations for the Native people of lands before colonization. What belongs to the past should stay there. if not it will never end... What should be looked at is the future no matter the roots of the people.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

That's not a bad point, especially depending on where you are from. I also feel like, after reparations, things wouldn't be "done" or "fixed", you know? I'm not sure how to better explain it, but I just see people moving on to the next thing and not being any happier.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Exactly! There is so much blame to be given in a way but as much to be forgiven. Should Germany pay for what the world endured in both WW? Should the Australians "pay" the natives? What about the Mayas? Then lets leave it to history and learn from it.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Jews did get some reparations after WW2, but that was going more to the people directly harmed by the government's actions, not people 150+ years later. I think that is a crucial difference too. I do feel the same way about Australia and Latin America. In Latin America it's even more absurd because so many people there are descended from both natives and settlers.

$ 0.00
3 years ago

I'm subscribe you and you subscribe back

$ 0.00
3 years ago