Humans are short and short-lived. Human skin is thin and easily brushed off. The contents of the human head are shallow and easy to deny. Humans are rational animals. Rational means to unilaterally choose their own standards to worship themselves. Demand the case at the same time judge yourself. On Earth, the only inhabitants are these kinds of creatures. The other creatures are not residents, others are just table ornaments, chairs, or deer heads on the walls of the house.
As proud inhabitants, it is impossible for humans to do justice.
What will you do when someone is different from us? Attack blindly so that the person ends up agreeing with the argument, not taking matters into account, respecting each other's opinions?
I often feel sick with the arguments of the coachman who is aiming for a false victory. What is it for? Then if you win the debate, then is that correct? Isn't that right?
Come on! Every human being has a different head. Each head has a different size. So, we want to force what's on your mind to be on other people's heads?
I hate it when people make negative comments, especially if it is related to the law.
A: Usury is haram.
B: Ah arrogant, very arrogant, using the salt of usury. Then if usury is haram, do you want to accuse people who work at the bank that their work is illegal? Then if usury is haram, why do you still use banks for transactions?
Have you ever seen that kind of debate? So what will you do? Defending person A by issuing arguments or fighting for the vote of B with irresistible arguments? Then, what do you get?
In the past, maybe I would have plunged if I saw such a heated debate. It's a shame to be just a spectator. Then, after going through those years of ignorance and questioning what I got other than heartache, I stopped doing it.
I like the discussion. But I don't like arguments. The first thing I do when I see two people who have opposing mindsets is to look at the point of view they are taking. If so, I will return to the basic law.
About usury, for example. Why is A contra? Why is B a pro? Oh, one uses a pragmatic angle, one uses a religious angle. What is the basic law? Because I am a Muslim, of course, I return to the argument. There are no verses that discuss that matter. Oh, there is! Okay, because I believe in my religion, then I also believe in the laws inherent in my religion.
Then, what if it turns out that I can't get away from all the things that might still be labeled usury? The important thing is I believe in the truth first. Even if I can't get away, it's not the law that's wrong. I haven't been able to carry out the law properly. Not because I was wrong, I blamed the law.
The point is that we try to understand the point of view the other person is using. If they are not the same, there is no need to attack to convince our most correct point of view.
How should we deal with differences? Let it go. After all, a beautiful difference, right? Rainbows will not be beautiful if they only have one color. Parks are also not attractive if they have colorful flowers.
You and I don't have to agree. However, I and you have to shake tightly, there can't be fights! Being different is beautiful.
If you want to have a large rice field, why go home! Print the rice fields on your head! So whenever and wherever you can harvest it yourself with results that match the number of your wishes! The more rice fields in your head, the more results you can get. Sowing high-quality seeds will result in super-quality rice which is of high value.
Let's wander. This is what's in my head. Could not be the same as yours. If you want to travel, please. If not, that's fine.