What is Nash Equilibrium from the Movie 'A Beautiful Mind'

7 43
Avatar for sheensheen13
4 years ago
Topics: Education

Watch this video and you will realize something. This is a scene in 'A beautiful Mind' and it is really an impactful scene that I had goosebumps after watching it.

"If we all go for the blonde, we block each other, not a single one of us is gonna get her. So then we go to her friends...."

In the end, they would all benefit and the blonde is the loser. Funny but really, it is gonna stay in your head, believe me.

A conversation between men wanting one specific girl, and a life changing fact that you can gain. Individual ambition serves a common goal.

John Nash got this idea when he and his friends got in a situation where they would approach a blonde girl, however,

it is impossible that all of them will win, so he suggested that no one gets the blonde and they should just approach her friends instead of blocking each other off. In the end, they would all benefit the situation.

From what I learned, Nash Equilibrium is about the outcome that takes place when the players in the society are in their best shoes with their best decisions, taking into account that other players in the society remain with their decision as well. It is about the situation wherein no player will benefit by changing a strategy if each player has already remained with their state.

After the scene in the bar, I realized how vital Nash Equilibrium is in being applied to economics. If all citizens could benefit to the situation where all players in the government and administration could think rational without having to take others down for their own selfish reason, then the state of our country would be better. If the players in the society, including us citizens, would remain sensible with our decision and lifestyle, bearing in mind that the outcome should be about our nation’s improvement and not about self-centered demands, it is possible to have progress sooner.

If Nash Equilibrium takes a deep part of the critical analysis of our state, it would help lessen the impact of political controls that are most often than not just about political desires to dominate and destruct what we entrusted to them. Truth is, progress is not about plans but about execution. However, if it all started wrong in the first place then we can assume that the outcome will not be favorable to many. Rationality doesn’t require monetary return and the decision-makers our country assigned shall not act as if it is hard to develop.

Imagine that we can all have the

power to be compassionate and careful in our judgment

The situation would turn out to be less egotistic and more humanitarian. Just like what Mr. Nash envisioned, we don’t always have to fight to get what we thought is the best; instead, we should be considerate to avoid spoiling the benefit that could be to everyone. Involving ourselves in discussion and arguments must not be always about winning as one, but winning as a whole.

Nash equilibrium may be complicated but applying it to economics would benefit the country as a whole.

We are aware that traditional policies may not be enough right now generate progress, thus, Nash equilibrium may help for what it’s worth. It is what we hope to accomplish, to have a nation with rational citizen and leaders that are not afraid to stand back just to give way to a more profound solution to achieve the optimum level of progress our nation can very well attain.

Sponsors of sheensheen13
empty
empty
empty

3
$ 0.05
$ 0.05 from @TheRandomRewarder
Avatar for sheensheen13
4 years ago
Topics: Education

Comments

I'd actually love to see this applied to the economy but then with the capitalist mentality already so deeply rooted here ;;-;; I'll just wonder what can be done to adapt it. I mean, each sector has a common goal and that should be "to serve the people" but that ain't happening

$ 0.00
3 years ago

True. The leaders who we thought are gonna put the people first don't really exist. Most of them are running for their own selfish motives,, one example is the fact that the government lets mining companies operate even if quarrying kills the environment and we all suffer from it. Hays :((

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Those are mostly illegal activities now. We're past the pnoy administration and gina lopez did make sure to shit most of those down (tho i still hate gina lopez lol) the good mining comp6have a compulsory environment restoration fund to make sure that the land they mined gets cleaned again and will be useable again after a few year of their mi ing activities

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Well those CSR are just a way to make it look like they will pay back the community that they are destroying but sadly like what happened to Montalban, what if its too late for that? Anw, may I know why you hate Ms. Gina? I personally think she alongside Sen. Miriam are the most selfless and compassionate leaders out there (although they are both gone huhu)

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Some really legit companies abide those, specially now that they're trying to reinvestigate the quarries in some areas (or i at least hope they do) plus some legit mining companies really do invest in that environmental fund and even hire people around the community for the cleanup and all.

As for her. She's against mining. I find her a hypocrite. She can say she hates mining when her glasses aren't made from silican and the equipment used for sewing her clothes plus her house and materials were not constructed from metal sources. She can say she hates a certain aspect of mining but it's pure hypocrisy to say she hates mining in general. This is from the view of someone who studied geology. She should declare her hate for mi i g when she doesn't benefit from it

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Okayyyy that's why... True though, I watched an episode of her show and her house is gigantic lels although the food are organic haha thanks for voicing out your thoughts. I just hope mining companies could limit their quota for minerals especially the private ones that don't really give back to the community which I am pretty sure some don't follow regulations and evade taxes like some ungrateful beaches. ;//

$ 0.00
3 years ago

Nahh the private ones are honestly the ones that actually pay up their taxes. The ones that do everything to evade those taxes are the local ones and of course, the illegal ones. Specially the small scale ones because if they don't reach a certain amount of average mined materials per month, they get exempted from the bracket. And those ones are the dangerous kinds that do deep excavation unlike the legal mining firms that go for an open mind kind of thing. It's safer, and it's mostly just soil relocation in the end.

$ 0.00
3 years ago