More comments — Bitcoin Cash (BCH) November 2020 Upgrade statement We, a…

S@Squeakytadpole 7 August 2020

I am new and still learning but I see the slp tokens and bch everywhere now. I have some tokens from telegram and just found read.cash today. I am ready to learn more and glad to see so much going on!

@Vladilus 7 August 2020

Great things will happen in the future of bch.

C@Commycool 7 August 2020

I think regular upgrade is what the system needs to keep thriving. The Aserti3-2d implementation is commendable

@emergent_reasons 7 August 2020

No worries. What I mean is some connection between your address and your identity. It's basically enough to have it connected to your account here, so no worries. Also, this document served it's purpose very very well. I think the ecosystem did an amazing job of coming together as stakeholders to make clear what is going to happen in November. That message is still very clear even though ABC has gone on another wild tangent.

@The00Dustin 7 August 2020

Theymos did good things before he did bad things. Luke-Jr did good things before he did bad things. Greg did good things before he did bad things. Amaury did good things before he did bad things. None of these people stopped with one bad thing or ever admitted that any of the bad things were bad. Honestly, I switched from the original bitcoin reference client to Bitcoin XT before it was obvious that Blockstream was bad simply because I believe a reference client should be just that, a reference. Then the reference client was rebranded to Core and alternative clients were disingenuously called altcoins. At this point, it was obvious there was evil afoot, but no money trail yet. Separate from that, I then switched from Bitcoin XT to Bitcoin Unlimited when I believed (perhaps mistakenly tricked by Blockstream fud) that Mike Hearn was doing bad things. When Blockstream pulled the Segwit2x crap, I started using the BCH version of Bitcoin Unlimited (now BCH Unlimited). I haven't switched from that in spite of several claims against them that all appear to have been fud, but I also wasn't vocal about my opinion that treating ABC as both a reference and production client simultaneously was begging history to repeat. I stayed quiet again when the previous contentious upgrade was thrown around last year (I've already forgotten the details, but I'm not talking about the obvious "I am Satoshi" sham known as BSV), hopeful that Amaury was misguided and would correct, as he did (without admitting wrongdoing). When the IFP came up, it really started to look like Blockstream/Core all over again and I still stayed quiet, hoping he'd correct again, and he did. When DAA came up, it was blatantly obvious that nothing was going to change, and I was ready to get vocal, but before I could, he showed his true colors and pulled this "you will pay me" stunt. Let's be honest, that money is easy to follow, and if FOSS never needed big money for development (all big money thrown at FOSS came from companies needing the FOSS), then decentralized currency doesn't, either.

@sykoe 4 September 2020

I also support this. I think another split would not look too nice and having everyone pull on the same string / chain ;) would definitely benefit the whole community address: Sykoe#87711; qps9dtlskd8kcc2g9lxmckcyw3mxmu2af5psnxa2lf signature: IBPKzfWJbvwWhVkTF6lsqaNyESTG6LvavdX0nvJlrJxobDYBiTN2OI3vozY0dG62M/y+DpZNuKMRYkSk1nuFfo8=

M@Moses27 3 November 2020

Awesome info, I greatly support this