Voice of a BCH fan
As a big block enthusiast, I have a good vision for BCH. BCH has a strong brand value. When it comes to payment, we may think of BCH first. I am small, but I am also part of the BCH community, and I hope that both sides of the divide will listen to the voices of our supporters.
What I care about:
1. BCH price rises
As investors, the most concerned is the rate of return on investment. If a currency does not have the value of investment and speculation, then it is unnecessary to hold this currency. Holding a currency is nothing more than to get higher returns, which is what I am most concerned about. As a small iron powder that has been deeply set by BCH for three years, I am full of confidence in BCH, and I firmly believe that holding will have a good performance, but what you have done has made BCH no longer good and hindered the price rise.
2. BCH does not toss and bifurcate
The BCH computing power war in 2018 can be seen clearly. CSW carried out planned separatist activities and successfully split from BCH. In addition to BSV, BCH was also brought into the abyss. BCH and BSV communities turned against each other. From comrades in arms to enemies, BCH's reputation and reputation were greatly reduced, and brand value was greatly damaged. Until now, it has not been fully recovered. Have you forgotten all this? I don't want you to go back and forth. This is not beneficial to BCH and not in line with the interests of the whole BCH ecosystem. I may not be so concerned about bifurcations, but bifurcations may have a long-term negative impact on BCH and weaken the community power of BCH. Therefore, I am against bifurcation.
I don't care
1. Who leads the development of BCH
If it wasn't for the uproar of IFP this time, I would not have known that the chief developer of bitcoin ABC, the core development team of BCH, was amary sechet, and I would not have known bchn, a rising star of BCH node client. As a BCH supporter, I really won't pay attention to these. What's the difference between who leads the development of BCH? I don't care who leads. As long as we can make achievements and make BCH better, we will support it if we can make some hot spots to hype it. It's not right to make such a big public debate. It will only make BCH's reputation worse.
2. Is BCH subject to tax
Whether BCH needs to draw miner's tax to fund BCH development is not decided by our small scattered energy. We do not care about it. We will not participate in it, nor will we take the initiative to donate too much money. There are various ways to raise development funds. If you don't support IFP, you can raise funds through donation. Bchn doesn't think so. If you feel that BCH development needs a stable and sustainable source of funds, then do IFP. Amaury thinks so. IFP does not seem to affect each other. You can work without money, but if someone needs to work with money, do not do to others what they don't want to do to others. Do not you understand this truth? At present, amary has also compromised and tried to create a transparent fund governance model involving large holders of coins and large miners. This is a good start. The pressure of the community on amary has played a certain role. Whether to split, we still need to seriously think about it.
To put it bluntly, what we care about is whether BCH can become better, more stakeholders can benefit from it, and BCH's ecology will grow stronger. I hope that the two sides of the divergence will give up some of their own insistence for BCH, and there is not much time left for BCH. Talent and passion should be used in BCH ecological construction, rather than endless arguments!
