@heartbeat1515
edited
more from that month
What are good quality content?
To be honest, I am also not sure about this topic. I have been inside the world of blogging and cryptocurrency for more than two years now. To be exact, it all started on December 2017, when a friend introduced me to crypto. Back to our topic of discussion. What is a good quality content? This is my opinion and my own only. I believe there is a lot of answers for this kind of question and it will be different for each person. Your own content. A criteria for a good contents. The contents of our writing suppose to be our own. We write it ourselves from our own thoughts or knowledge or experience without copying other published article and post it as our own. It would not be fair to the original content creator amd I believe it will be called plagiarism. In easier sentences, we became a thief. But, it doesn't mean that we cannot copy other writing. What use it is to write if nobody else read? Right? When we read someone articles and we find it interesting we share it to others. The different between clicking a button to share and copying is, when someone else click on the link that we shared, they can see there real contents creator. If we copy their writing to our blog their writing became like we are the one writing it. The one thing that we can do is to give credit to the owner by mentioning their name in our blog or a citation for the contents that we copy. Did I get this through? My English vocabulary is not very good. That is for now. See you again soon. Do read the comments below too. There are more information given by the other writers too.
5 comments
Te felicito por tu publicación, aportaría esto para que sea de buena calidad, tiene que tener una redacción clara,transparente, se debe hacer el uso correcto del idioma, sintaxis, además de aplicar la síntesis ,brevedad,objetividad, originalidad entre otras cosas,
Thank you for your comment. I have to use google translator to understand it.
I will take into account the friendly language.
If you quote someone, no matter how short it is, you should mark it as a quotation and name the author you quote. However, you may not take long passages from someone else's writing anyway, not if it is not old enough to have expired copyright. If you copy a whole article, even if you mark it as a quotation, it would be a violation of copyright. You must never quote "an essential part" of someone else's work without their permission, not even if you honestly declare it as a quotation. There are some exceptions to this, but in general, that is the principle. If you want to show your audience a whole article (or an essential part of it) by someone else, you can always publish a link to it, so they can read the original author themselves.
Thank you for the addition. I hope the other readers read all the comments below this post too.