My NO-Mask Social Experiment Today-Better Results than I Expected
**Obedient or NOT...**
**TL;DR** (Too long, didn't read/summary)
I have been in the state of Oregon, USA recently...
Oregon Gov has “*required everyone*” must wear a mask beginning July 1st (earlier this week)
I value my health, therefore I do NOT wear a mask (DYOR)
This “*requirement*” is NOT lawful (detailed below)
I shopped in multiple stores today WITHOUT any mask with ZERO problems, not even a sneer!
Is tomorrow (July 4th) a celebration of Independence or just mere obedience to *tyrants*?
Oregon Governor Dictates Face Masks Required “Everywhere in the State”?
As many have probably heard, dino-media has been screaming we must (archive backup here) “Gov. Kate Brown is requiring Oregonians to wear face masks everywhere in the state” (starting back on July 1)! https://www.oregonlive.com/coronavirus/2020/06/oregonians-will-be-required-to-wear-masks-statewide-not-just-in-select-counties-starting-wednesday-governor-says.html https://archive.vn/YDUQ9
Is this true?
Has there been a new or updated Executive Order with this requirement?
Where/What are the details?
Is this Lawful?
What happens if one doesn't wear a mask?
Is it true that Gov. Kate Brown Says Wearing Face Masks is Required of “Everyone”?
**Yes!**
This is true as can be seen on this page (archive backup here) from the “*Governors Office*” https://www.oregon.gov/newsroom/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newsid=36869 https://archive.vn/jU1C5
“Portland, OR—Governor Kate Brown announced today that Oregonians statewide will be required to wear face coverings in indoor public spaces, beginning this Wednesday July 1. The guidance applies to businesses and members of the public visiting indoor public spaces.”
Has there been a new or updated Executive Order with this New Face-Mask Order?
**No!**
This page (archive backup here) lists all executive orders (EO) from Gov Kate Brown. The most recent EO dealing with “Covid-19 and dated June 30, 2020 (EO 20-27) has **NO** mention of this statewide mask order nor does any other EO. There is a note in §-21 (*Guidance*) that the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) shall provide “*guidance*” which “*may be amended from time to time”*! https://www.oregon.gov/gov/admin/Pages/executive-orders.aspx https://archive.vn/kks1Y
So, there is an EO that says the OHA can “*modify the requirements from time to time”*! Wow, doesn't that make you feel good? The OHA can now make any requirement for how Oregonians LIVE day-to-day without a new EO! How many of you voted for anyone at the OHA? (As if voting has ever solved our problems, ha!)
Where/What are the Details of this Statewide Mask Order?
The OHA's COVID-19 information page is here. This page (archive backup here) reiterates Gov. Kate Browns requirement (there is nothing about this in an EO) that “Face Coverings Requirement are Extended Statewide”. EO 20-27 says its up to the OHA to determine requirements, yet here OHA says its Kate Brown making the requirement. Seems like a circular argument as to who actually made the requirement. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with deniability or responsibility could it? 🤔😉 https://govstatus.egov.com/OR-OHA-COVID-19 https://www.oregon.gov/newsroom/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newsid=36869 https://archive.vn/jU1C5
From the OHA COVID-19 page there is a pdf document “Statewide Mask Guidance”. This document is titled:
https://govstatus.egov.com/OR-OHA-COVID-19 https://sharedsystems.dhsoha.state.or.us/DHSForms/Served/le2288K.pdf
***Statewide Mask, Face Shield, Face Covering Guidance***
Hmmmm…. “*guidance*” doesn't sound like a word I would use when detailing a REQUIREMENT. Does it to you?
**There is NO mention of ANY fine or any other penalty if “*****guidance*****” is not followed!**
Maybe *they* are smarter than I often give them credit for since they CANNOT lawfully require ANYONE (generally) to wear a mask! More on this in the next section...
Is this Lawful, Constitutional Etc…?
I’ve already touched on the fact (just above) the “Guidance” document makes ZERO mention of any penalties and that there is no EO that specifically calls for mandatory statewide mask wearing. It seems clear to me that *they know* they have NO lawful authority to make wearing masks a requirement for all and that they are just using word salad… word games (with a HUGE boost from the collectivist dino-media) to make it SOUND LIKE its a *Lawful Order.*
**But it is NOT!**
Another significant detail is that Executive Orders ONLY apply to those that work/report to that branch of governments head, in this case Gov. Kate Brown. EO’s do NOT apply to the public generally!
Even the VERY politically correct Wikipedia has a quote (archive backup here): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order#History_and_use https://archive.vn/r2bXR
“Executive orders are simply presidential directives issued to agents of the executive department by its boss.”
There is a reason this stuff is NEVER taught in government schools!
My Experience in Local Businesses Today While NOT Wearing a Mask-NO Problems of ANY Kind!
**Local Bank**
At the drive-up window (attempting to cash a check), the teller said I needed to come inside. I mentioned that I didn't have a mask and without any hesitation the teller said no problem, just come in (they just wanted a thumbprint).
**WalMart**
Without wearing a mask, I entered the local WalMart and right away passed at least three employees of which at least 2 made eye contact with me. While I was in the store only about 10-minutes, I passed at least 20 employees and of course MANY customers. NO one said anything to me or even gave me any dirty looks! I was not the only one without a mask. While recent history (even just 1-week ago), the vast majority of customers were NOT wearing masks, today was probably the opposite. I would guesstimate that about 85% were wearing a mask. But that means about 15% were disobedient! 👍
**Grocery Store**
I was actually in and out of this store a couple times today, never wearing a mask. Again, no one said anything to me or gave me any bad looks! This store also had about 15% disobedience (not wearing a mask) among its customers while I was there!
Of course there is no guarantee that my experience today will be the same in the future. Your experience could easily vary, especially for those in/near larger metro areas.
Independence Day-Is it?
Have Americans Become Merely Just Obedient to their Rulers?
Tomorrow is July 4th. Historically it’s been a time of celebrating our *Independence*. **Is it still?**
The more individuals that are disobedient to tyrants the better in my opinion! And it doesn't take a majority to succeed as proven by the founders of these United States! Join me (if you have not already) in being disobedient!
The very wise George Carlin had it right in his “*Germs*” bit from his "*You Are All Diseased*" (1999)!
https://youtu.be/X29lF43mUlo
Does the income-tax (USA Only) Actually Apply to You? Part-2
**Series** **Summary** https://read.cash/@free-yourself/does-the-income-tax-usa-only-actually-apply-to-you-part-1-16908897#summary
This is a multi-part series detailing some of the evidence (the law itself, court decisions, etc.) of how the *income-tax* does **NOT** apply to most Americans!
Upon completion of this series, you will be able to see how simple the issue really is!
**Brief Review - “*****income-tax*****” can ONLY apply to a privilege**
In Part-1 we learned (based on their own words from US Supreme Court decisions): https://read.cash/@free-yourself/does-the-income-tax-usa-only-actually-apply-to-you-part-1-16908897
The *income-tax* is a tax upon a privilege
Congress cannot name something to be a taxable privilege unless it is first a privilege
Earnings from employment are a right and thus not taxable as a privilege
Now we know that the *income-tax* can only apply to a privilege and earnings are NOT a privilege. This is also buttressed by the Brushaber decision that said the purpose of the 16th Amendment was “*maintaining the limitations of the Constitution and harmonizing their operation”.* The result of the 16th Amendment was NO change in the government's taxing powers! So if there was no constitutional authority to tax “*income*” (a right) before the 16th Amendment, and this wasn't changed after its passage, what then is the “*income*” to which the 16th Amendment refers that is earned as a privilege? https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/240/1
Who has “*income*” that is not earned as a right and thus liable for the “*income-tax”*?
Those that have written the tax code are sneaky bastards! There are many reasons it is so confusing and filled with legalese. In this context, to purposely make it difficult to determine exactly to whom the *income-tax applies!*
U.S. Code Title 26 is titled *Internal Revenue Code.* Chapters 1 & 2 of Subtitle A-Income Taxes are essentially just the rules of computation and only use general and vague terms as to whom the tax may apply to. But Chapter 3 jumps right out! Chapter 3 is titled: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/subtitle-A https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/subtitle-A/chapter-3
**WITHHOLDING OF TAX ON NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS**
This is whose earnings are NOT a right that a U.S. Citizen would have, and thus are exercising a privilege! And thus, THIS is to whom the “*income-tax*” applies!
Now most might say that I have jumped the shark here and I admit that as the tax code is written, it can be VERY difficult to discern that the income-tax **doesn't** apply to the earnings of the average US Citizen merely exercising a right. But as we have already seen by the US Supreme Courts own words that a U.S. Citizen earnings are a right which cannot be the subject of an excise tax (which the *income-tax* has been defined as).
Who does a *Withholding Agent* deal with?
One of the KEY definitions in the tax code is the *Withholding Agent*. And this is just one of the details to show that the *income-tax* DOES apply to non-resident aliens and foreign corporations! https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
A *withholding agent* is the entity that is required to withhold *any tax*. Seems straightforward enough, but we still don't know upon whom “*withholding agents*” deal with. But sections 1441, 1442, 1443 and 1461 make it clear! https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
The title of section 1441 is: **Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens** https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1441
Well I know that's not me since I am **NOT** a *non-resident alien,* are you?
The title of section 1442 is: **Withholding of tax on foreign corporations** https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1442
I am also **NOT** a *foreign corporation*, what about you?
The title of section 1443 is: **Foreign tax-exempt organizations** https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1443
Strike three! I am **NOT** a *foreign tax-exempt organization either,* are you?
And finally, **section 1461** is just where a **withholding agent** is made liable for such tax (to be collected from entities defined in 1441-1443). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1461 https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
So we see that a **withholding agent** is required to *deduct and withhold any tax* from*:* https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
*non-resident aliens*
*foreign corporations*
*foreign tax-exempt organizations*
**Its clear to me that I am NOT any of those things! Are you?**
And these facts align with the multiple US Supreme Court decisions that U.S. Citizens earnings (generally) are a right and thus cannot be subject to the *income-tax*! The *income-tax* IS constitutional (as written) since it doesn't apply to the average Americans earnings that are a right!
**More to come-stay tuned!**
I am not the expert on this subject, but I have learned a lot from the man that IS the expert and literally wrote the book on it! **Dave Champion's book**: https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/
Dave has a short introduction **here** (backup on LBRY **here**) about The Largest Financial Crime In History! **Here** (backup on LBRY **here**), he has mini-course on the 16th Amendment (11-min video). Dave has a much more detailed (his **book** is the definitive guide) video **here** (backup on LBRY **here**). https://youtu.be/z2zstuiUpf4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/EXPOSED_-The-Largest-Financial-Crime-In-History!:f?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://youtu.be/Uhy1xcrDvG4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/You've-been-LIED-to-about-the-16th-Amendment-so-they-can-steal-from-you!:0?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/ https://youtu.be/SD9D9rMaKss https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/3_22_17---Dave-gives-the-evidence-that-the-income-tax-doesn't-apply-to-YOU!-SD9D9rMaKss:2?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom
Dave was also one of many subject matter experts (including Dr. Ron Paul, Edwin Vieira, Joe Banister and many others) in Aaron Russo's documentary: **America: Freedom to Fascism (2006)** https://youtu.be/0mtY0dLfK1Y
**Disclaimer** https://read.cash/@free-yourself/mythbusting-for-us-citizens-every-crypto-transaction-is-a-taxable-event-0ac89842#disclaimer
I am not an attorney, accountant or CPA. I am not giving tax advice. I am just trying to shed some light on information that most may not be aware. What anyone does or does not do with this information is up to them. I encourage all to DYOR to properly follow what the law ACTUALLY says!
I have no affiliation with **Dave Champion** or any other entity discussed herein. https://drreality.news/
Why PERMISSION-LESS Peer-to-Peer Cash IS Crucial For Our Future!
**Permission-less value transfer methods are KEY if one desires the ability to be “free”!**
Many countries are already restricting or limiting cash transactions. I expect more and more to follow. Many countries have announced or are already working on their own electronic “currency”. Since these systems will be centralized (the state is monitoring every transaction), ALL transactions using these systems will be:
**Permission-ed** - censorship of those deemed “bad actors” will be limited or even completely denied https://www.thefreedictionary.com/permissioned
**Tracked/Taxed** – ALL transactions can and will be tracked thus making ALL transactions open to increased theft via “taxes”. Theft (via taxes), being so easy to “collect” will skyrocket!
Outside of local (in-person) trade or barter, the only alternative I see are **PERMISSION-LESS** (decentralized) networks like BitcoinCash (BCH). https://www.bitcoincash.org/
**Introducing New-Comers to P2PCash**
When first educating new-comers to P2PCash, maybe (at first) skip all the technical details and just jump to the idea of a permission-ed vs permission-less future! This is a KEY concept. Then the technical details may become less important. Get them to want to learn, use and become advocates themselves!
Do they want all their transactions tracked & taxed?
Do they want all their transactions to require permission?
If you haven't been a strong advocate for Permission-less P2PCash, why not? If we don't get it done, you can bet the powers that shouldn't be will do it for us!
**It is up to all of us!**
What do you think?
What have you found most successful in promoting adoption of permission-less P2PCash?
Does the income-tax (USA Only) Actually Apply to You? Part-1
Series Summary
This is a multi-part series detailing some of the evidence (the law itself, court decisions, etc.) of how the *income-tax* does **NOT** apply to most Americans!
Upon completion of this series, you will be able to see how simple the issue really is!
The "*income-tax"* has been defined by the US Supreme Court as a tax on a privilege!
It is well established (US Supreme Court et al.) that the *income-tax* is an *indirect-tax* in the form of an ***excise-tax*** . https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/
What is an *excise-tax*? https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/220/107/
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/220/107/
What is a privilege? https://thelawdictionary.org/privilege/
https://thelawdictionary.org/privilege/
Another way to think of what is a *privilege*, is something that you do NOT have a right to do! A privilege in this context is typically something that requires a permit, license or other government sanction such as *incorporation*.
Now we see how the US Supreme Court has defined an "*income-tax*" as a tax upon a privilege. Are the fruits (compensation) of your labor ("*income*") a privilege? Or are they a right?
The US Supreme Court has made it clear that earnings from employment are a **right**! https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/1/
The Tennessee Supreme Court had this to say about income or earnings:
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2435151/jack-cole-company-v-macfarland/
West Law taxation keys reaffirm
Summary of Part-1, Does the income-tax actually apply to you?
The *income-tax* is a tax upon a privilege
Congress cannot name something to be a taxable privilege unless it is first a privilege
Earnings from employment are a right and thus not taxable as a privilege
In part-2 and beyond, we will see how the 16th Amendment actually IS constitutional because its scope is VERY narrow (it did NOT *confer any new power of taxation*). The important question to ask is upon whom does "*the tax*" apply since we now know that *income* or *earnings* are a right and cannot be taxed as a privilege! https://read.cash/@free-yourself/does-the-income-tax-usa-only-actually-apply-to-you-part-2-cca3b45e
Further Education to Set Yourself FREE! https://read.cash/@free-yourself/mythbusting-for-us-citizens-every-crypto-transaction-is-a-taxable-event-0ac89842#further-education-to-set-yourself-free
I am not the expert on this subject, but I have learned a lot from the man that IS the expert and literally wrote the book on it! **Dave Champion's book**: https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/
Dave has a short introduction **here** (backup on LBRY here) about The Largest Financial Crime In History! **Here** (backup on LBRY here), he has mini-course on the 16th Amendment (11-min video). Dave has a much more detailed (his **book** is the definitive guide) video **here** (backup on LBRY here) https://youtu.be/z2zstuiUpf4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/EXPOSED_-The-Largest-Financial-Crime-In-History!:f?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://youtu.be/Uhy1xcrDvG4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/You've-been-LIED-to-about-the-16th-Amendment-so-they-can-steal-from-you!:0?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/ https://youtu.be/SD9D9rMaKss https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/3_22_17---Dave-gives-the-evidence-that-the-income-tax-doesn't-apply-to-YOU!-SD9D9rMaKss:2?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom
Dave was also one of many subject matter experts (including Dr. Ron Paul, Edwin Vieira, Joe Banister and many others) in Aaron Russo's documentary: **America: Freedom to Fascism (2006)** https://youtu.be/0mtY0dLfK1Y
Disclaimer https://read.cash/@free-yourself/mythbusting-for-us-citizens-every-crypto-transaction-is-a-taxable-event-0ac89842#disclaimer
I am not an attorney, accountant or CPA. I am not giving tax advice. I am just trying to shed some light on information that most may not be aware. What anyone does or does not do with this information is up to them. I encourage all to DYOR to properly follow what the law ACTUALLY says!
I have no affiliation with **Dave Champion** or any other entity discussed herein. https://drreality.news/
Mythbusting (Americans only): “Every Crypto Transaction is a taxable Event”
Many of us have heard this phrase or similar! https://cryptocurrencyfacts.com/the-tax-rules-for-crypto-in-the-u-s-simplified/
Is Every Crypto transaction really a taxable event? https://cryptocurrencyfacts.com/the-tax-rules-for-crypto-in-the-u-s-simplified/
If most transactions are taxable, yes this could dampen Peer-to-Peer Cash (P2PCash) adoption. I KNOW this is NOT true for me and the vast majority of transactions by other Americans since I have researched what the law actually says (USA only). But the generations of propaganda from the *authorities* and dino-media have been very successful in getting many to fear the IRS when in fact the "*income-tax*" **does not** even apply to the VAST majority of Americans!
The "*income-tax"* (USA only) ONLY APPLIES to:
Non-resident aliens with U.S. source income
Foreign corporations with U.S. source income
U.S. citizens abroad with foreign earned income
There, I said it! Bold statements of **fact** require **strong evidence** and there is a plethora of evidence! Since I am all about ADOPTION of P2PCash, I want as many to read this as possible. So today I will just present one item of evidence that the "*income-tax"* does NOT apply to the vast majority of Americans!
How Does the Law Define a "*Withholding Agent**"*? https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
Nice and short, but we now have to see whom a withholding agent deals with per sections 1441, 1442, 1443 and 1461. https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
The title of section 1441 is: Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1441
Well I know that's not me since I am **NOT** a *non-resident alien,* are you?
The title of section 1442 is: Withholding of tax on foreign corporations https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1442
I am also **NOT** a *foreign corporation*, what about you?
The title of section 1443 is: Foreign tax-exempt organizations https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1443
Strike three! I am **NOT** a *foreign tax-exempt organization either,* are you?
And finally, section 1461 where a withholding agent is made liable for such tax (to be collected from entities defined in 1441-1443). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1461 https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
So we see that a withholding agent is ONLY required to *deduct and withhold any tax* from*:* https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?height=800&def_id=26-USC-313249694-1199109725&term_occur=1&term_src=title:26:subtitle:F:chapter:79:section:7701
non-resident aliens
foreign corporations
foreign tax-exempt organizations
**Its clear to me that I am NOT any of those things!**
**Are you?**
More information in Does the income-tax (USA Only) Actually Apply to You (Part-1)? https://read.cash/@free-yourself/does-the-income-tax-usa-only-actually-apply-to-you-part-1-16908897
Further Education to Set Yourself FREE!
I am NOT the expert on this subject, but I have learned a lot from the man that IS the expert and literally wrote the book on it! Dave Champion's book:Income Tax: Shattering the Myths by Dave Champion https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/
Dave has a short introduction here (backup on LBRY **here**) about The Largest Financial Crime In History! Here (backup on LBRY **here**), he has mini-course on the 16th Amendment (11-min video). Dave has a much more detailed (his book is the definitive guide) video here (backup on LBRY **here**). https://youtu.be/z2zstuiUpf4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/EXPOSED_-The-Largest-Financial-Crime-In-History!:f?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://youtu.be/Uhy1xcrDvG4 https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/You've-been-LIED-to-about-the-16th-Amendment-so-they-can-steal-from-you!:0?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom https://drreality.news/product/income-tax-shattering-the-myths/?v=7516fd43adaa https://youtu.be/SD9D9rMaKss https://open.lbry.com/@free-yourself:7/3_22_17---Dave-gives-the-evidence-that-the-income-tax-doesn't-apply-to-YOU!-SD9D9rMaKss:2?r=5XZdGoWMfzd3RVBfGSgHBEybLS3s8bom
From the back cover of Dave's book, a few testimonials:
"There are few things in life more complicated than the income tax. Dave Champion has done a master job of connecting the dots so the average American can finally understand the monumental fraud being perpetrated on most of the population since 1913. With information this complete and compelling, Dave is probably correct when he speculates that the government will try to discredit him or "silence him". I recommend you buy this book while it is still legal to do so." *-****Michael Badnarik*** *(2004 candidate for President of the United States, Libertarian Party)*
"Dave approaches the income tax from his unique angle. *Income Tax: Shattering the Myths* leaves you to draw but one conclusion: The income tax does not apply to everyone; it has its constitutional limitations, and as the current system is enforced, the American People are being subjected to a tax system that runs afoul of the Constitution." *-Phil Hart (2004-2012 Idaho State Representative)*
Dave was also one of many subject matter experts (including Dr. Ron Paul, Edwin Vieira, Joe Banister and many others) in Aaron Russo's documentary: America: Freedom to Fascism (2006) https://youtu.be/0mtY0dLfK1Y
Disclaimer
I am not an attorney, accountant or CPA. I am not giving tax advice. I am just trying to shed some light on information that most may not be aware. What anyone does or does not do with this information is up to them. I encourage all to DYOR to properly follow what the law ACTUALLY says!
I have no affiliation with Dave Champion or any other entity discussed herein. https://drreality.news/
[sponsors]
@free-yourself
