The Unseen Power of Destruction: How Bitcoin Cash Can Rise Again

An operation by BTC and the bankers? Let’s be honest—this article has been read by, what, four people? If this were part of some grand psy-op, it would be one of the most inefficient operations in history. But I appreciate the laugh.

Joking aside, accusing every critical viewpoint of being an 'operation' is just a way to avoid real discussion. If you disagree with what I’m saying, engage with the actual content instead of defaulting to paranoia. We don’t need to fabricate enemies when the real challenge is right in front of us: our own stagnation.

And let’s be clear—creating doubt in newcomers isn’t my aim. If we want BCH to thrive, we need to do better than just dismiss anyone who questions the status quo.

Read.cash is where people interested in BCH would look so you are here trying to sew seeds of doubt and foster discouragement. You have not presented any actual content, it is all full of vague characterizations like "the project has stagnated" and "we can do much better". There is no substance in your article. You have worded it in such a way to shed a negative light on the community and project without actually saying anything specific related to the supposed issues or solutions.

By the way, it’s interesting that you, who accuse me in every comment of orchestrating some grand plan against BCH, just created this account two days ago! specifically to respond to my articles and sow doubt about my legitimate critiques. Quite curious, isn’t it?

Just got back into BCH recently after I noticed the project is back on track to be money for the world, that is why I created the account two days ago.

Saw your article because it was on top of the feed and it was very retarded so I had to respond.

So, you created an account just two days ago and your first instinct was to hurl insults at an article you barely understood? Let’s be honest: your reaction says more about you than it does about my critique. The strength of any project—BCH included—isn't proven by blind loyalty, but by its ability to withstand scrutiny. If BCH can’t handle criticism without defenders resorting to name-calling, that speaks volumes about where the real weakness lies. Insults are the weapon of those who can’t think beyond their own insecurities.

The fact that you feel threatened by a few pointed observations says everything. If BCH is truly back on track, it will thrive on discussion, dissent, and the ability to evolve. But instead of engaging with ideas, you’ve chosen the path of baseless accusations and childish insults. It’s ironic, really: the very behavior you're displaying is the kind that keeps BCH from rising to its full potential.

To everyone else reading, ask yourself—are we really going to grow as a community if this is the level of discourse we tolerate? Is BCH so fragile that a single article can cause this kind of panic? Or is it time to admit that honest conversations about where we stand are the only way forward?

I did a couple months worth of research into BCH before I decided to jump back in. I instantly saw your motivation to sabotage the project. BTC maxi's and bankers are terrified of BCH because they are both running a confidence game. Once a critical mass of people realize they have been swindled it is over for both of these groups.

This is why people like you are all over the place spreading FUD regarding any serious competition to those fraudulent narratives.

As I said you are not providing any constructive criticism, just trying to cast general and unfounded doubt.

If this were a calculated effort to undermine Bitcoin Cash, I’d be wasting my talents on a platform barely clinging to life. Let’s not kid ourselves: Read.cash is no battleground for a grand conspiracy. If I were here to run some kind of psychological operation, I’d have chosen a stage with more than 9 spectators. The fact that you're accusing me of such on a forum this quiet says more about the state of BCH than my article ever could.

Let’s address your complaint: you want 'specifics.' But sometimes the problem isn't just a checklist of issues. It’s the bigger picture, the general attitude and momentum. Stagnation isn’t always about one glaring issue; it's about the creeping mediocrity that sets in when a community starts thinking everything’s fine when it’s not. When did better become an accusation? Why does asking for more from BCH suddenly feel like an attack?

If you’re not seeing the same stagnation, maybe it's because you’ve grown comfortable with the status quo. And if my argument feels vague to you, perhaps that’s because you’re looking for answers in a list of bullet points instead of the challenge I’m presenting: to stop coasting and start demanding more from ourselves and this project.

If you’re looking for specifics, maybe start by asking why we’ve been stuck here, debating on a platform in decay, instead of pushing BCH to its potential.

And if you’re still convinced this is some grand scheme, maybe it’s time to look at the real issue staring you in the face.

Your articles come off as an attempt to sabotage the positive sentiment. You most likely jumped into BCH during a pimp and now you are sour, or you are just paid to drag down any competition to BTC.

Activity on BCH is growing and will continue to do so because the community is dedicated to making BCH the best form of digital money.