Our Family Structure Could Be Deeply Shaken

One of the great dangers that is emerging today, which many people have not yet heard of, is the "childfree" movement.

We see people calling themselves "childfree" when they consider childlessness to be the opposite of childlessness, that is, people who do not have children of their own accord or who are opposed to having children.

These people argue that being childfree is a pragmatist reality. In other words, they believe that it is beneficial for both themselves and the world.

It is a trend that sounds good at first when viewed with a shallow thought, which creates the logic of "we shouldn't cause this world to leave a living being in the middle of so much cruelty".

But when we think deeper, we can certainly see how dangerous and overly materialistic it is. To make it a little clearer, the attempt to impose the childfree idea as something that is more important than the moods and thoughts and logic of all human beings or all living beings will cause this dangerous trend to become a philosophy that is quickly accepted among people.

One of the biggest reasons for the insidious proliferation and acceptance of the Childfree movement was Philip Arthur Larkin, a British writer and poet who was named Britain's most important writer by The Times.

In his poem, This Be The Verse, Larkin set off this dangerous trend. The last two lines of the poem read;

"...Get out as early as you can,

And don't have any kids yourself"

Since This Be The Verse was published in 1971, it seems that the danger of "childfree" was sown in the 1970s. So we can talk about a journey of around 50 years until today.

If the changes are physical, they can happen in a short period of time, but if they are philosophical, they are spread over years, because it is not easy to appeal to ideas. And when ideas change, and especially when those ideas normalize something dangerous and make it accepted, it is already too late. Unfortunately, one day that dangerous trend will be called "freedom" or "human rights"...

To summarize, we as human beings have to protect and preserve our generation. The Childfree movement is not a simple danger, it is a gigantic danger. It is aimed at the generation, generations. It is to destroy generations. To understand this more clearly, to see the extent of the terrible danger, let us imagine for two minutes that the whole world is childfree.

As a matter of fact, the world has never and will never witness any creature other than man adopting such a view, accepting extinction as a good thing. In fact, we see animals in the realm of existence that disregard their own lives for the survival of their progeny...

Finally, it is essential that we realize that while freedoms should be up to the point where someone else's freedom begins, it is a great blunder and disaster to call the views and ways of life that endanger not one person but the whole of humanity freedom.

Nature is a lesson for us. To understand whether something is right or wrong, we need to look at other living beings, even inanimate beings. The universe is in a completely natural flow. Attempting to disrupt the natural flow is nothing but calling for the apocalypse.