Since I don't have anything to post as I'm busy with my naps and modules, let me share this essay type of questions first about Philosophy. Though I didn't clearly understand the lesson, I still managed to answer it? Anyway, you can judge it if you want to. How do you understand the statement of Socrates when he said that “the unexamined life is not worth living.”? Apparently, we already have idea who is Socrates in the Ancient world. Probably, he just want to imply that we must examine or observe ourselves first if we’re already ready to face the real world as it will be our main asset to be confident throughout this judgemental world. Relatively, he just want to enlighten us that we should assess ourselves initially if we were already seeing the development throughout our environment as it will be our companion if we’re worth living or not. Besides, living with precise paths can be our basis if our life is worth it or not. Based on the characteristics of philosophy, would it be possible for any person to engage in philosophical discussion? Why or Why not? Of course, yes. Upon looking at the branch of philosophy that we learned, I might say that we are automatically dealing with philosophical discussion. Even we might say that we’re not that good in terms of this subject, we can casually apply it on our daily lives mainly religion, school, family relations, etc. Therefore, it’s possible for us to engage in philosophical discussion.
Log in to join in Reading is open to everyone. Replying needs an account.
1 comment
Philosophical discussion is always great. I really feel that the main stream is limiting free discussions. How about you, my friend.