Why to fund an organization led by toxic people and has a secret fund management?

I've spent extended hours in BCH telegram channels and on Reddit. I liked the community and it felt so great till I seen one dev talk very bad about other respected people in the BCH community. The whole thing was concentrated in BCHgang telegram channel where people were having meaningful and very informative discussions till a different trend have rised and we started to see people initiate personal attacks on other BCH community members. Attacks from the lead dev included:

• Attacks on BU team members and want to cancel them even if they apologies

• Attacks on Roger Ver

• Attacks on people offering solution to the 25tx limit (Hermen)

• Making fun of Gabriel Cardona for his move

• Calling people who disagree with him "attention whores"

• There are really a very long list of people who have been attacked by him and short list of people who he endorse inside the BCH community.

If ABC lead dev is going to ask for funding they should be open on why David Allen was the one who is managing the fund and developer meetings despite his history with Gemz coin and Bitcoin foundation fund.

If ABC needs funding to do the work requested why the bitcoincash.org owner (Amaury) refused to accept adding a green BCH media kit even as a link on the website. How we can believe that he aren't just being stubborn. What would hurt to accept the community demand, is they are just doing similar thing with the 25tx limit?

some of the toxic comments just recorded in the last few days:

https://t.me/CryptoToxi

Just a note, they are attacking BU for having a transparent system while no information about how FVNI is managing the fund they got from the community or how does ABC spend the funds it get.