History is not only confined to the past highlighted gestures. In the history we should have the knowledge about the writer's biasing and its view because several religious controversial things will make us groggy about history. We read the leaders, the commanders, the celebrities and so on. But why we had no knowledge of a soldier who was more enthusiastic and chivalrous than his commander??
I'm twenty years old and very curious about the different zones of history. As for as I know my elder brother asked me to read the historical novels and the non syllabus books so that I could get extra knowledge from my fellows. The first book I read was the "zalmat". Everyone here will have the idea of reading the first book in his life but I can remember that feeling.
As the time passed by I read about Hitler, Mesoleeni,Alexander, napoleon, Hazrat khalid bin waleed RA, Salah Odin ayoubi and many more great commanders. Than I read about the leaders like Lincoln, lannan, Arafat, Bhutto, Gandhi, Ali jinnah and many more.
I read about politics and its history but why the quest of reading more is still alive ??