In line with the socio-cultural and technological developments that have characterized the rapid development of society, quality control procedures for goods and services have evolved continuously. Most businesses must achieve perfection since there is a large competition in the global market. Managing quality is important in the manufacturing process and the satisfaction of customers. If the company shows a breakneck rate on their business, it's all for nothing and will have a negative effect on your market. To achieve better customer satisfaction, a management philosophy like Total Quality Management (TQM) helps in improving the quality of the products and services. As stated by the American Society for Quality (ASQ), "TQM is a management approach to long-term success through customer satisfaction. In a TQM effort, all members of an organization participate in improving processes, products, services, and the culture in which they work." According to Mosadeghrad (2014), one of TQM's goals is to improve the satisfaction of its customers and enhanced the efficiency of the organization through the delivery of high-quality goods and services. This showed an increased spike in popularity for various reasons like world market success, enhanced economic results, better customer support, best-fit solutions for the clients, has its continuous growth, and acts as a viable alternative to other appeals.
In implementing total quality management, organizations must consider how consumers perceive quality in both the products and the services provided. When a business pays more attention to quality in its manufacturing processes, fewer issues can arise. The management should commit to evaluating a product 's output relative to its quality through customer surveys that can help managers recognize design or any other process that has an impact on a product or service 's quality and can provide a potential for continuous improvement. While the implementation of TQM is complicated, extensive, and involves enormous organizational efforts, it involves several difficulties and barriers to improving the performance of the practical application. There is a range of barriers that face the implementation of the TQM process. There are no limits to the barriers to implementing Total Quality Management ( TQM). They can exist in the manufacturing, infrastructure, government, and education sectors. Thus, recognizing and overcoming these obstacles both before and during the introduction of TQM is critical for all organizations. Some of the barriers or obstacles confronting total quality management during implementation are discussed below. These are nine summarized general barriers that are similar to all types of organizations and across all levels of management.
Lack of Management Commitment. For any organizational endeavor to succeed, the management time and organizational resources of the management must be fully committed. The goal must be conveyed explicitly and constantly to all personnel management, and the TQM concept must be consistently applied. Success needs dedication, good planning, and organizational skills. Newell and Dale (1990) found that even small corporate managers were enough to distract focus from the consistent improvement. Schein (1991) further reported that the U.S. Quality Council lacks this management commitment in many businesses. There may be different explanations for the lack of commitment to quality control. Major challenges include the need for short-term gain and a number of executives' limited knowledge and training. For example, Duran observed that many managers have extensive business and finance experience but not in improving quality. Similarly, while the CEO does not have to be a qualified specialist, The systems fail when the CEO does not understand the contribution to productivity and consumer satisfaction that these strategies make toward. Therefore, top management must support quality enhancement programs no matter how far the monetary consequences seem to reach the programs. Competition alone cannot be seen as the sole factor motivating managers to introduce quality initiatives.
Inability to Change Organizational Culture. It is difficult to change the culture of an organization, and it will require as much as five years. Individuals resist change because they become accustomed to a particular process and it becomes the preferred way to do it. Management needs to recognize and leverage the basic principles of transition. They must understand that whenever people want to and fulfill their own needs, they adjust. Another statement is unless there is sufficient justification for doing so, never expect anyone to engage in behavior that serves the organization's values. Lastly, to accept change, people need to move from a state of fear to a state of trust. Changing one's way of doing things is hard for individuals. Thus creating cultural change is even harder for an organization. Those businesses will increase their chance of success when they spend more time on the cultural aspects of implementing the TQM system. One example of this cultural change is Chandigarh, which is the city in India that became the first smoke-free city in the world. It's daunting to sit back on your shoulders and relax. Nevertheless, a lack of continuous process, product, and service improvement will even leave the leader in the dust. Through company possesses its own unique way of doing things, this is described in the organization's culture. The methods, principles, practices, and traditions determine how the staff and management can help accomplish the objectives and achieve organizational goals. Sticking to the corporate culture is also an important part of executing the organization's mission. However, culture needs to be checked and re-adjustments need to be made in accordance with the current cultural, political, social, and technical realities, in order to increase its performance. Despite the sufficient cultural changes, the absolute quality implementation has made it challenging since most of the organizations' top-level management is static despite their ways of doing things.
Poor Planning. Each of the organization's members must be active in the creation of the implementation plan and any modifications that might arise as the plan progresses. The two-way exchange of ideas is important and should be taken up by all workers during the production and execution of the strategy. The target should be customer service, rather than financial or revenue targets. The lack of a sound plan has also served ineffectively to decrease efficiency. Duran (1987) noted that initial planning shortcomings caused a method to operate at a high level of chronic waste. Using the data collected at the recent seminars, Duran (1987) stated that although some managers were not satisfied with their progress on their quality distribution agenda, they gave low priority to quality planning. The pre-planning stage of cultivating the correct mindset and level of understanding is important for the success of a quality management program. In their research, Newel and Dale (1990) found that a significant number of businesses are either unable or unwilling to prepare effectively for improving their output quality. While many conducted pre-implementation in careful and thorough preparation, not one of the companies analyzed or defined the stages their method has to undergo beforehand. The root cause of bad designs and specifications can be that many owners do not realize the effect of the poor drawings have on the design quality, expense, and time of a project. Whatever the cause, poor plans and requirements contribute to a project costing more, taking longer to complete, and causing more dissatisfaction than it should. If management took sufficient time to prepare projects carefully and invest in collaborations to build an efficient project team, several plans could be accomplished in terms of product efficiency such as initiatives in prevention-oriented management that would greatly increase the quality of the products or services a company provides.
Competitive Markets. A competitive market where there are many producers and by increasing or decreasing their production, no single producer will influence the market price, is a driving force behind many other qualitative barriers. It has one effect in reducing quality levels to a minimally acceptable level. This quality barrier is mostly a mental barrier triggered by incomprehension of quality meaning. Sadly, too many businesses are putting a high cost to efficiency. Their interpretation leads to the conclusion that a firm would not be able to afford the quality. This is important to use a wider meaning to look at the consistency of the quality, not just solely in the product but in every function of the firm. All firm functions have a qualitative dimension. When the consistency of quality performed is not good, the business will incur excessive expenses and, in the end, move them on to the client. TQM should operate by encouraging workers at all levels to constantly enhance what they're doing, thus reducing unnecessary costs. Through this, the company that is associated with TQM will significantly reduce the operating costs. The competitive advantage is that resources are focused on reducing costs and enhancing customer service.
Ineffective Measurement Techniques and Inadequate Resources. The organization's main characteristics should be assessed for successful decision-making. To develop a process, one needs to calculate the impact of suggestions for improvement. Data access and fast retrieval are important for effective and successful processes. Finding the root cause, repairing the problem, and removing the root cause, should be done to keep the problem from repeating. Because most organizations do not include quality consistency in their strategic strategy, TQM receives little consideration in terms of both financial and human resources. Most focus is drawn to increasing the organization's profit margins, with little thought as to whether the supply to consumers is of the quality anticipated. There is a paltry budget allocation made to the preparation and growth of workers which is essential for the implementation of comprehensive quality control. Employee training is frequently perceived as needless costs that threaten the profit margins which as a result, TQM has been overlooked because its implementation does not automatically provide short-term benefits to the organization.
Lack of Proper Training and Human Resource Development. Training and education is a process that is underway for everybody in the organization. Needs need to be identified, and a plan must be developed to meet those needs. Training and education are most successful and effective in implementing the training on TQM principles by the senior management. External trainers may be employed on a continuous basis to convey the TQM initiative to all staff. The second most significant challenge was lack of experience in group discussion and communication strategies, problem recognition, quality management skills, and problem-solving process. There is evidence that there is a lack of knowledge and adequate preparation at all levels of every organization, and that it is a significant contributor to the resistance of the workers. For example, Schein (1990) stated that failure to teach appropriate process skills in business schools has led to manager ineffectiveness. Thus, TQM needs a well-trained and educated workforce. Even though businesses invest extensively in the knowledge of quality, statistical process management, and quality circles, the training is still too narrowly oriented. Inadequate education and training pose a significant challenge in the creation and implementation of a quality system. To create a quality product for a client, workers need to know how to perform their jobs. To be effective with TQM, companies have to commit in educating their workers at all levels. TQM should provide comprehensive training like expertise in technical processes, communication skills, management of small teams, problem-solving methods, and customer relations.
Lack of Customer Focus. Organizations need to consider their consumers' changing desires and preferences. With this understanding, it is important to have an effective feedback mechanism that provides data with decision making. Grant direct access to the right people, who are working directly on the product to the clients. The organization cannot be held responsible for producing results when it fails to empower people and teams. Many of the companies' business strategies are not customer-oriented. In a given time frame, they prefer to concentrate more on profit-oriented goals. When a firm leaves business after attempting to introduce a quality management system, it obviously failed to establish a constancy of intent for the quality of goods and services among its employees. The commitment to the new ideology must be genuine, self-evident, and deep since the employees have seen multiple attempted faddish schemes before. There may have to be something drastic to set this plan apart from the others. Employees need something to persuade them that it is new, and long-term as well. Tangible practices such as spending money on training and equipment or closing down operations when something goes wrong will help persuade workers to prove just how serious the management is. Little market analysis is conducted to assess the market success of a product or service in relation to its quality. Most companies find these surveys to be expensive and therefore little consideration is shown for the enhancement of the quality or standard for the customers' satisfaction.
Resistance of the Workforce. Teams need to be prepared properly and at least by a facilitator at the outset. Individuals should be empowered to make decisions that affect their process efficiency or customer satisfaction. For a number of factors, a workforce is frequently hesitant to accept TQM. A lack of long-term objectives and expectations can cause the loss of legitimacy of a quality implementation system. There should not be an adversarial connection between management and non-management. For improvement, a cooperative partnership is needed. When making a TQM project, it must be trusted by the workers and supported the recognition and appreciation of the management objectives. Workers should also be regarded as key participants in the quality assurance in decision-making processes so including them would have a stimulating impact on the implementation of quality initiatives.
Incompatible Organizational Structure and Poor Management Practice. The differences between individuals and departments may create problems relating to implementation. Using multifunctional teams can help break down the barriers that are longstanding. Restructuring could be required to make the company more receptive to client needs. Individuals who don't accept the new ideology can be forced to leave. The poor practices in management, competitive environment and a general lack of higher aspirations led to unproductive and unhealthy mentality. Similar views are also reflected in folk sayings like "It's not my job" so they tend not to take interest in it. These attitudes arise from the common notion that management is always correct and that workers are only expected to enforce management decisions without questioning the higher-ups. Lethargy is further propagated by the inability of management to train workers on TQM fundamentals that can create positive attitudes by involving them in teams that recognize and solve problems. This training will turn workers from part of the issue into part of the solution. It will promote motivation and innovation, and create positive and productive behaviors that concentrate workers on fundamentals, such as keeping consumer needs in mind, continually finding improvements, and taking full responsibility for their work.
Conclusion
For most service industries, Total Quality Management (TQM) has become an integral and essential part of growth and development. TQM's advantages have been extensively debated, however, the implementation challenges received a little focus. For the successful execution of a quality project, a quality philosophy is needed. This approach would promote a shift in a company's lifestyle over the long term. However, due to obstacles and barriers, many of them struggle to get the full benefits from this method. This paper was able to identify the numerous TQM barriers that are responsible for the unsuccessful implementation of a TQM system.
There is a range of barriers that face the implementation of the TQM process and affect its performance. Some of the general barriers that are similar to all types of organizations and across all levels of management are lack of management commitment, inability to change organizational culture, poor planning, competitive markets, ineffective measurement techniques and inadequate resources, lack of proper training and human resource development, lack of customer focus, the resistance of the workforce, and incompatible organizational structure and poor management practice.
Several main success factors are significant resource inflows, sufficient training and education, employee engagement, and successful evaluation techniques. A good TQM system is special, so middle management will be encouraged to concentrate on long-term goals rather than short-term objectives. Teamwork is essential to commitment and participation. It is necessary to have a commitment of the top management. Groups should be empowered to work together and efficiently and should concentrate on improving the service and pleasing of customers.
For successful implementation of TQM, all organizations should concentrate on first, creating a consistent goal for the product and service enhancement in order to become profitable and competitive, remain in business and provide jobs. Second, stop the dependence on mass inspection and stick to statistical evidence on which quality is founded. The third is adopting the new ideology since we are in a fast-changing economic age. We can no longer need to deal with generally accepted rates of delay, mistake, defective content, and poor workmanship. Fourth, the consistency of the products coming in should improve its quality and not on price alone. Lastly, do not fear the problems and face them. Keep improving the production and service system. Productivity should continue to increase, and costs should decrease.
References
[1] 9 obstacles in implementation of TQM. (2015). Retrieved from: http://blog.shakehandwithlife.in/2015/02/9-obstacles-in-implementation-of-tqm.html
[2] An Introduction To Total Quality Management. (2017). Retrieved from: https://businessanalystlearnings.com/ba-techniques/2017/2/11/an-introduction-to-total- quality-management
[3] Cătălin, S.H. (n.d.). The Existing Barriers in Implementing Total Quality Management. Department of Management, FSEGA, UBB, Cluj-Napoca, România
[4] Duran W.E. (1987) "Quality productivity and competitive position. Massachusetts Institute of Technology", Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA, vol. 2139, pp. 373.
[5] K.R Fernando, et al. Six Sigma Concept and Obstacles to implementing TQM. Course:- EMG 372-2 Operations Management Lecturer. Entrepreneurship and Management Degree Programme. Uva Wellassa University.
[6] Mahr M.Haseeb Sultan. (2015). Barriers to total quality management implementation.
[7] Mosadeghrad, A., (2014) Why TQM programmes fail? A pathology approach, The TQM Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 160-187
[8] Newall, E., & Dale, B. (1990). The introduction and development of a quality improvement process: A study. International Journal of Production Research, 29(9), 351- 359.
[9] Schein, E. (2005) Organisational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass. Publishers, San Francisco, CA
[10] Suleman, Q. (2015). Challenges to Successful Total Quality Management Implementation in Public Secondary Schools: A Case Study of Kohat District, Pakistan. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
[11] W. Edwards Deming, Out of the Crisis (Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 153.
[12] What is Total Quality Management (TQM)? (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://asq.org/quality-resources/total-quality- management#:~:text=A%20core%20definition%20of%20total,culture%20in%20which% 20they%20work.
