One of the most important questions in the universe is near to the solution

KAMIOKA OBSERVATORY / ICRR / UNI TOKYO

After reviewing the new year's data, scientists have found that neutrinos and anti-neutrinos change their properties in different ways.

Stars, galaxies, planets, everything that exists today is the cause of a unique feature of the universe.

The nature of this feature is still a standard for scientists to date, under which the matter is supported by the 'antimeter'.

Now the results of an experiment in Japan will help to address the issue, which is one of the biggest questions in science.

This feature depends on how the meters and the antimeter particles work differently.

The world we see, or what we know, is all matter, meter. The main particles of the meter are electrons, covarx and neutrinos.

On the other hand, however, there is an antimeter.  Every particle found in matter has a corresponding antimatter particle.

At present, the universe is far higher than the antimeter. But it wasn't always so.

At the time of the 'Big Bang', equal amounts of meters and antimatters would have come into being.

ESA / PLANCK COLLABORATION

Why is there not 50% of the antimeter in the universe? It is an important question of astronomy, where did the antimeter go?

Professor Lee Thompson of the University of Sheffield says: 'When particle physicists (physicists who examine the substances) create new particles in particle ecertors, they always appear in the form of a pair, namely 'partical' and 'anti-partyal'. For each negative-charged electron, a positive charge is a posetron (a source that corresponds to the electron in the antimeter). '

'So why isn't 50% of the antimeter in the universe? This is an important question for experts, where did the antimeter go?

Whenever a particle meets its antimeter, they are destroyed in a flash of energy.

In the early moments of the Big Bang, the universe would have been in the presence of meter and antimeter particles and the destruction. But in the absence of any other force or action, the universe should have only survived the rest of the universe.

Professor Stephen Rambold, of the University of Manchester, says: 'It would have been boring enough and we wouldn't have been here today. '

SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

This difference between meter and antimeter is one of three conditions that Russian scientist Andrei Sakharov declared necessary in 1967 to be built at different rate of meters and antimeters.

So what happened?

This is the latest Experience t2K in Japan. T2K experiment is done in japan's communicano observatory.

The researchers used the particulate data to observe the neutrinos and their anti-neutrons, which were produced at the Proton-Elicalater Complex in Tokai, Japan, 295 km away. T2K means communicators from Tokyo!

Professor Stephane Rambaud says: 'Although THE C-Volation in the Courx particles has been experimentally recognized for a long time, it was not seen in neutrinos before today. '

As they travel through the Earth, the particles and their anti-particles show different and changing properties called flavors.

Scientists believe that understanding the different properties of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos will explain why there is so much more than a meter in the universe. This difference between meter and antimatter is called charge conjugation and parity reversal (CP) violation.

This difference is one of the three conditions that the Russian scientistAndrei Sakharov in 1967 declared to be necessary for the formation of meters and antimeters at different rates.

After reviewing nine years of data, scientists have discovered that neutrinos and antineutrinos change their properties differently because some of the flavors they start with at the beginning of the journey have different flavors at the end. ۔

This difference statistically reaches the level of Three Sigma. In simple terms, this means that there is so much difference between them that we can say that CP is a violation.

"Although CP evolution has long been recognized experimentally in Quarks, it has not been seen in neutrinos before today," says Professor Stephane Rambaud.